PETA Killed 95 Percent of Adoptable Pets in its Care

[Georgerx7di]

I hate pet lovers.

What about chicken lovers? 'Cause, I mean, nothing's better than chopping a chickens head off and then fucking the body and it writhes about, let me tell you! You just can cut that chicken's head off, stick your dick in the ass of that chicken, and that damn chicken'll go crazy on your ass and go "Caaaaah".

omg, that's horrible. I lmfao, that shit is hillarious. Terrible, but funny as shit.

[muy_thaiguy]

I hate pet lovers.

What about chicken lovers? 'Cause, I mean, nothing's better than chopping a chickens head off and then fucking the body and it writhes about, let me tell you! You just can cut that chicken's head off, stick your dick in the ass of that chicken, and that damn chicken'll go crazy on your ass and go "Caaaaah".

hectah has risen againah!

[HungrySomali]

I hate pet lovers.

What about chicken lovers? 'Cause, I mean, nothing's better than chopping a chickens head off and then fucking the body and it writhes about, let me tell you! You just can cut that chicken's head off, stick your dick in the ass of that chicken, and that damn chicken'll go crazy on your ass and go "Caaaaah".

omg, that's horrible. I lmfao, that shit is hillarious. Terrible, but funny as shit.

Not really...

[gdeangel]

Just to jump in late, the original story is seems not too far fetched.... I have reached the conclusion a while ago that many of those setting the agenda for the animal rights movement don't care so much about animals as they are about denigrating the relative rights of people - one of the principal such rights (just behind the agriculture agenda) being the right to keep a pet in conformity with what were once general social norms and customs (e.g., yes, some pets were "outside dogs" kept in pens, but wasn't that better than putting them in a kill shelter??)

[Falkomagno]

I hate pet lovers.

I love pet haters

[mpjh]

Juan, you should be ashamed.

Recently, some groups have made misleading claims about PETA’s euthanasia rate compared to the rates of various animal shelters. One such group is the deceitfully named Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF)—a front group for Philip Morris, Outback Steakhouse, KFC, cattle ranchers, and other animal exploiters that kill millions of animals every year—which is acting not out of compassion but out of greed. These companies are worried about the strides that PETA is making that are changing their industries and compelling them to take animal welfare concerns seriously; they hope to scare people away from supporting PETA by misrepresenting the vital work that we do for animals. To learn more about CCF—which USA Today recently opined should rename its Web site FatforProfit.com—please see the following Web sites:

•http://www.ConsumerDeception.com
•http://www.CitizensForEthics.org/node/19131
•http://www.Prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=8984

Although PETA does not run an adoption facility (we refer most adoptable animals to well-known shelters with a high rate of public traffic), we have managed to place hundreds of animals in excellent lifelong homes. For many of the animals we do accept—such as those who are severely injured, aggressive, or otherwise unadoptable—we are often a “shelter of last resort,” offering a humane death to animals who would otherwise suffer a slow and painful end.

While some of the animals we take in are lost companion animals or adoptable strays, many of the animals we receive are broken beings for whom euthanasia is, without a doubt, the most humane option. To cite a local instance, our caseworkers were able to gain custody of a dog who was tied to a 15-pound chain and who was starved until she was severely emaciated. We had to carry her into the emergency clinic because she could barely walk. A vet recommended that the most humane option for her was a peaceful and dignified release from her suffering. We pursued criminal charges against those responsible for her condition, leading to their convictions for cruelty to animals. To learn more, please see http://www.HelpingAnimals.com/f-asiasstory.asp. On another occasion, when a power-line transformer explosion burned a flock of starlings, PETA was the only agency to come to the birds’ aid, offering the animals a painless escape from their suffering.

PETA receives calls every week from people who do not have the inclination or money to provide veterinary care. Many of these people request that we euthanize their animals because they cannot afford to have them euthanized by a vet or because the animals would suffer excessive stress and pain if they were transported. PETA will not turn its back on these animals simply because they might make our “numbers” look bad.

Unlike “no-kill” shelters, PETA does not refuse animals simply because euthanasia is the only humane option for them. Many of the animals we take in are given to us because they have been rejected by other facilities.

Thank you for your sincere questions and concerns.



"Take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.�
- Elie Wiesel

[bedub1]

that would be classified as "Propaganda"

[mpjh]

The truth is always defamed as propaganda by those who cannot tolerate its bright light.