A group of well-known CC forum regulars and distinguished fuckheads are looking to recruit one additional fuckhead to their ranks in order to allow them to play one of their traditional "Fuckhead Battle Royale" grudge-matches. The candidate will be required to play a single eight-player game on the World 2.1 map and to make constant and lively contributions to the game-chat (which is likely to be vulgar and offensive). The ideal candidate will be a highly visible member of the forum-community and will have a strong track-record of talking shite. Being notorious in some way, having a talent for flaming (or generally being rude to) other users, and having earned one or more forum-ban, would be a strong advantage. However, all applicants will be considered so long as they are able to demonstrate that they fit the essential criteria of enjoying playing risk, enjoying abusing the pointless ratings system, and preferring to use the game-chat for talking copious amounts of smack and/or bollocks as opposed to tediously ruminating over strategy. In addition to this, the candidate must be vaguely witty and have the ability to read and write basic English.
This advertisement will close as soon as a suitable candidate is found. Please apply below.
No agencies please.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Per our recent discussion via pm, I would like to volunteer for the job of Fuckhead. I believe I am over qualified, as I have more than a passing understanding of English, but would be willing to take a pay cut for this position.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... =8&t=90574
What the hell is this? You not only lock the topic unnecessarily, but you don't have the decency to make the post yourself, or give us a reason as to why the topic was locked?
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
AAFitz wrote:im gonna guess it had something to do with the title
I see nothing wrong the the title. That also doesn't address the other two issues.
yes it does by defacto logic... the title is obviously the reason, and was obviously going to be locked, ie no need to make a post, because ...well...only a ****head would need one to understand this.
much as even one would know that this will be locked too. As spam, wrong forum, and just being ridiculous....which is a new rule
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk Too much. I know.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Behold, two lists of similarly titled threads (titles including 'fucking' and 'f*ck' respectively)... note that only two of them are locked (both for reasons other than their titles).
Now, remind me again when it was that threads with expletives in their titles became taboo around here? Then explain to me why my thread in particular got locked (apparently) on account of its title? Or is this just another "We're all fucking terrified of DM" moment from our valiant moderating team?
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Dancing Mustard wrote:Hang on... since when were expletives against the rules here?
Sure, no flaming and all that, but simply saying 'f*ck' has never been grounds for a lock or edit before now. Why the sudden change?
I'm one of the biggest anti-flaming folks around here (I think), and I also think the use of expletives is ridiculous. However, DM is right...it's never even been remotely against the rules (nor have I gotten the impression at all that the site wants it that way).
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
There's three spots open... I'll send some PMs (avec passwords + game numbers) around tomorrow evening (after my fellow fuckehads have had a chance to PM me with any objections to those who've put their names forward so far).
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Dancing Mustard wrote:There's three spots open... I'll send some PMs (avec passwords + game numbers) around tomorrow evening (after my fellow fuckehads have had a chance to PM me with any objections to those who've put their names forward so far).
What fuckhead's have put their name in the fuckhead hat to be pulled out by you, my fellow fuckhead?
Dancing Mustard wrote:There's three spots open... I'll send some PMs (avec passwords + game numbers) around tomorrow evening (after my fellow fuckehads have had a chance to PM me with any objections to those who've put their names forward so far).
What fuckhead's have put their name in the fuckhead hat to be pulled out by you, my fellow fuckhead?
Ya, there's only two spots open...
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.
I was wondering where it had gone to, fuck this shit sucks.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
The candidate will be required to to make constant and lively contributions to the game-chat (which is likely to be vulgar and offensive). Promoting offensive comments
Being notorious in some way, having a talent for flaming (or generally being rude to) other users, and having earned one or more forum-ban, would be a strong advantage. Promoting bad behavior
Enjoying abusing the pointless ratings system Ratings abuse is a punishable CC offense.
