Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
When/if you foed him, it hides his game chat.PatriceB wrote:Saxitoxin declared straight-out that he would suicide into whoever attacked him, but somehow that was deleted from the chat and I can no longer access it. In the chat, all of his discussion was removed, which is evident from what is left by other players.
Patrice...did you happen to foe Saxitoxin? You see, when you foe someone, their game-chat is cleared out of your view. It's still THERE...but you can't see it. So if you unfoe him, you'll see it again, I suspect.PatriceB wrote:Saxitoxin declared straight-out that he would suicide into whoever attacked him, but somehow that was deleted from the chat and I can no longer access it. In the chat, all of his discussion was removed, which is evident from what is left by other players.
Can't speak for PKeough but I can speak for myself:PatriceB wrote:Accused:
PKeough
Saxitoxin
The accused are suspected of:
Other: In a game I played, both threatened to suicide into whoever attacked them. When I protested at that reasoning, both took action in support of their threats despite my having not attacked.
Game number(s):
Game 5241422
:From the Chat:
2009-07-11 21:18:55 - PKeough: first to try and take me out recieves the remainder of all my forces
2009-07-11 21:19:56 - PatriceB: would that be as an ally? or an enemy?
2009-07-11 21:21:33 - PKeough: first to try and destroy me receives the brunt of the rest of my forces
2009-07-11 21:29:41 - PKeough: i am redirecting all my remaining forces upon the agressor
Saxitoxin declared straight-out that he would suicide into whoever attacked him, but somehow that was deleted from the chat and I can no longer access it. In the chat, all of his discussion was removed, which is evident from what is left by other players.
BTW - I friended Patrice because I think a foe is a friend you just don't know well enough.PatriceB wrote:Yes, I did foe him. Thank you both very much.
That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
It would seem you don't like it from the other side.saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.
I don't have a problem with it. I am only, as always, concerned about facilitating a proactive and cooperative atmosphere for the mods. Having a bunch of lookey-loos jump in doesn't help jurisprudence.Strife wrote:It would seem you don't like it from the other side.saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.
I'm not uninvited...in fact, YOU invited me when you posted it in this public forum. And thank you for inviting me!saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.
It would appear that you don't understand the various place-settings enough to comment accurately on it.saxitoxin wrote:No problem with it at all. Just don't like it from the other side if it's coming from a mere school marm, uppity as she may be. She needs to learn her place.
Interesting how you've changed your quote once I quoted it showing you just how bad it looked. Your dishonesty and lying knows no bounds!saxitoxin wrote:I don't have a problem with it. I am only, as always, concerned about facilitating a proactive and cooperative atmosphere for the mods. Having a bunch of lookey-loos jump in doesn't help jurisprudence.Strife wrote:It would seem you don't like it from the other side.saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.
You'll find out about jurisprudence soon.
Woodruff, you silly old school marm - Patrice posted it! Woodruff, you tickle my feathers endlessly! Never stop being you! Love ya' Woodsie!Woodruff wrote:I'm not uninvited...in fact, YOU invited me when you posted it in this public forum. And thank you for inviting me!saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.

Edit: quoted so they can't edit the flame out again.saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm - Patrice posted it! Woodruff, you tickle my feathers endlessly! Never stop being you! Love ya' Woodsie!Woodruff wrote:Flaming is not permitted in these forums hypocrite.saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.
I'm not uninvited...in fact, YOU invited me when you posted it in this public forum. And thank you for inviting me!
Woodruff At Work
You're right...she did. It shouldn't have been hard for me to tell, I guess...given that you've started so many ridiculous threads in this forum that I should have realized this non-ridiculous one couldn't possibly have been started by you.saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm - Patrice posted it!Woodruff wrote:I'm not uninvited...in fact, YOU invited me when you posted it in this public forum. And thank you for inviting me!saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.Woodruff wrote:That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.
Of course the only reason you've said this is because it was quoted before you could get rid of it...saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
No.saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.
reported for trollingWoodruff wrote:No.saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.
How very ironic.saxitoxin wrote:reported for trollingWoodruff wrote:No.saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.
reported for flamingWoodruff wrote:How very ironic.saxitoxin wrote:reported for trollingWoodruff wrote:No.saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.
How very laughable.saxitoxin wrote:reported for flamingWoodruff wrote:How very ironic.saxitoxin wrote:reported for trollingWoodruff wrote:No.saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.
I have no need for two of them, but thanks for the suggestion.PKeough wrote:Get a life Woodruff