Minister Masket wrote:Woodruff wrote:Only one missile? Omaha, Nebraska...take out as much of the US's missile capability as possible (with only one missile).
Do they include nukes?
Because multiple nukes exploding
in the same place would surely make blockbuster viewing.
Those bombers weren't carrying flares, that's for sure.
dogstar4god wrote:Also, why Fort Knox? That's one of the least strategic places to bomb
ok, where would be a strategic place to bomb?
I already told you...Omaha, Nebraska. Take out a third of our nuclear triad.
PLAYER57832 wrote:One note -- our military was less vunerable in many ways in 1961 than now. Now everything is tied in over the internet and regular phone lines.
The military IS more vulnerable now, that is very true. However, everything is NOT tied in over the internet and regular phone lines. Not even close, for the highly sensitive stuff. The military is more vulnerable now because everything is tied to COMPUTERS (which really are easy to knock out).
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.