Moderator: Community Team
What does a voteless townie have to do with lynching or no lyching? I don't see why we should have to find a voteless townie, unless of course the vampires want to know who they shouldn't be bothered killing during night phase.Well, if we find the voteless townie that's one person we can be fairly certain we shouldn't lynch.
well PMC should have kept the list updatedCrazyirishman wrote:I replaced masterchief a while back.cena-rules wrote:problem there is not everyone is active, but its worth a shotMeDeFe wrote:Then let's use my method, everyone votes for the person below them on the list on page 1 (if pmc has updated it, that is), if one person has 0 votes against them we'll know who is voteless. (i.e. the person above the person with 0 votes against)cena-rules wrote:it is a simple matter of clearing up whether he was telling the truth or note_i_pi wrote:I'm not voting for Falko. I didn't vote for him the first time because it would push him into lynch, and I'm not voting this time. I won't say that Falko is 100% guaranteed townie, but if you can't find other people that are more suspicious cena, and you think revisiting an attempted lynch on someone who claims to be a vig, then I'm afraid I'll have to:
FoS cena-rules
If the voteless person voted for Falko "yesterday" we can repeat the experiment of giving him 8 votes and seeing if he lives, otherwise we can let it be. Since we don't know how pmc calculates votes against Falko (if Falko is telling the truth) it could be that Falko would be lynched if people keep adding votes until pmc counts 8 against him.
unvote vote masterchief
If it's a voteless townie, as the more experienced players say is usually the case, we shouldn't lynch him. For every person who's most probably or even verifiably a townie, the list of people who are possibly scum gets shorter.e_i_pi wrote:Aside from drawing attention away from CW suddenly getting votes, can anyone please explain why we are doing this? I don't see a point to it at all. Also, I find MeDeFe's quote very suspicious:
What does a voteless townie have to do with lynching or no lyching? I don't see why we should have to find a voteless townie, unless of course the vampires want to know who they shouldn't be bothered killing during night phase.Well, if we find the voteless townie that's one person we can be fairly certain we shouldn't lynch.
I'm retaining my vote for CW. I believe he is scum, I'm not getting suckered into this paper-thin ploy by cena and MeDeFe to draw attention away from CW. If anyone wants to know my voting, they can go back through the thread to find out.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
The mafia could do that anyway, couldn't they? And if we (as is probable) have a protecting role or two chances are they wouldn't manage to kill them if they did. Now... who claimed bulletproof bodyguard again?captainwalrus wrote:Why would there be a voteless townie? It seems as if there were a voteless townie it would be really pointless. UNLESS it went along with a night role like investigation, or bulletproof or something. I will unvote since I think it would be better if no one figured out who the voteless townie was, since the mafia could just target them.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
the problem is, a voteless townie doesnt add to the town so there would be no point the mafia targeting himMeDeFe wrote:The mafia could do that anyway, couldn't they? And if we (as is probable) have a protecting role or two chances are they wouldn't manage to kill them if they did. Now... who claimed bulletproof bodyguard again?captainwalrus wrote:Why would there be a voteless townie? It seems as if there were a voteless townie it would be really pointless. UNLESS it went along with a night role like investigation, or bulletproof or something. I will unvote since I think it would be better if no one figured out who the voteless townie was, since the mafia could just target them.
Cena's right. Although the voteless townie would also have a power role of some sort, the mafia would keep him alive only because it would be a waste of a NK to kill him. He can't vote against them.cena-rules wrote:the problem is, a voteless townie doesnt add to the town so there would be no point the mafia targeting himMeDeFe wrote:The mafia could do that anyway, couldn't they? And if we (as is probable) have a protecting role or two chances are they wouldn't manage to kill them if they did. Now... who claimed bulletproof bodyguard again?captainwalrus wrote:Why would there be a voteless townie? It seems as if there were a voteless townie it would be really pointless. UNLESS it went along with a night role like investigation, or bulletproof or something. I will unvote since I think it would be better if no one figured out who the voteless townie was, since the mafia could just target them.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
captainwalrus wrote:Why would there be a voteless townie? It seems as if there were a voteless townie it would be really pointless. UNLESS it went along with a night role like investigation, or bulletproof or something. I will unvote since I think it would be better if no one figured out who the voteless townie was, since the mafia could just target them.

Vote CWcaptainwalrus wrote:unVote
Vote the fuzzy pengui
to test who is voteless.
What is the point of a voteless townie anyways?
Gilligan wrote:I'M SO GOOD AT THIS GAME
My stepmom locked the bathroom door
So I opened the lock with my shoelace
I see someone hasn't been paying attention to the whole thread. someone suggested we all vote for the person directly below us to test for the voteless townie... and I am pretty sure that is just what CW was doing.The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:Vote CWcaptainwalrus wrote:unVote
Vote the fuzzy pengui
to test who is voteless.
What is the point of a voteless townie anyways?
Your reasoning is pretty odd...what are you going to do, go around 1 by 1 trying to see if people will vote back for you? Seems like a pretty big waste of time to me...
Why?cowboyz wrote:captainwalrus wrote:Why would there be a voteless townie? It seems as if there were a voteless townie it would be really pointless. UNLESS it went along with a night role like investigation, or bulletproof or something. I will unvote since I think it would be better if no one figured out who the voteless townie was, since the mafia could just target them.
My FOS keeps getting stronger and stronger for CW
uh PMC... this is what I had for a VCpmchugh wrote:Vote Count!
Stroop (1) - naxus
CW (5) - Falko, stroke, e_i_pi, Fuzzy
naxus (1) - cowboyz
e_i_pi (1) - MeDeFe
cowboyz (1) - squirrel
fuzzy (1) - CW
MeDeFe (1) - GEQ
Don't blame me if its wrong, but credit me if it's right!
but there is still the fact that there is 5 votes on CW with only 4 voters... who wants to confess to being a double voter if PMC's VC is correct...pmchugh wrote:The vote count is correct, to my knowledge. I removed cena's vote cause masterchief is no longer playing.
Pretty obvious that one of them is a double voter, no need to out themstrokem1257 wrote:but there is still the fact that there is 5 votes on CW with only 4 voters... who wants to confess to being a double voter if PMC's VC is correct...pmchugh wrote:The vote count is correct, to my knowledge. I removed cena's vote cause masterchief is no longer playing.

pmchugh wrote:Vote Count!
Stroop (1) - naxus
CW (5) - Falko, stroke, e_i_pi, Fuzzy
naxus (1) - cowboyz
e_i_pi (1) - MeDeFe
cowboyz (1) - squirrel
fuzzy (1) - CW
MeDeFe (1) - GEQ
Don't blame me if its wrong, but credit me if it's right!
Heres a vote count from page 1 and it proves its not stroke.PMChugh wrote:Vote count!
skittles 1- (stroke)
stroop 1- (mr. squirrel)
cowboyz 1- (naxus)
With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.
Heres one from page 4 that shows that its not falko.PMChugh wrote:Hopefully Correct Vote count!
suspect- 2 (stroop, captain walrus)
cena 1- (falko)
e_i_pi 1- (cena)
strokem 3- (mr squirrel, fuzzy, SEA)
SEA 1- (cowboyz)
With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.
heres one that from page 9 that proves it's not fuzzypmchugh wrote:Deadline 7 days from this post!
Not enough vote gives a no lynch. Prods coming to inactives soon.
Vote Count!
strokem 1- (fuzzy)
walrus 2- (falko, mr squirrel)
falko 1- (suspect)
With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.
and heres the one from the bottom of page 12 which shows that e_i_pi is our double voterpmchugh wrote:Deadline may be extened for replacements.
Vote Count!
strokem 1- (cena)
walrus 1- (falko)
falko 1- (suspect)
masterchief 1- (naxus)
mr squirrel 1- (skittles)
no lynch 2- (e_i_pi)
With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.
SEAsportsfan and masterchief are being replaced
Fixed.
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that
Alright, I'll try to use naxus's technique to deduce the no-voter.Stroop wrote:A double voter almost guarantees that someone else has no vote at all, so Falko is officially not cleared, IMO.
I want to vote either CW or Falko, but I'm not sure which I think is scummier
This vote count clears me, medefe, cowboyz, and suspect (since GEQ replaced him).pmchugh wrote:ACTUALLY THE OFFICIAL AND PROPER Vote Count!
falko 7 - (suspect, skittles, fircoal, stroop, cowboyz, medefe. squirrel, cena)
With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.
The above is correct to the best of my knowledge.
This one clears ficoal:pmchugh wrote:Vote Count!
Stroop (1) - naxus
CW (5) - Falko, stroke, e_i_pi, Fuzzy
naxus (1) - cowboyz
e_i_pi (1) - MeDeFe
cowboyz (1) - squirrel
fuzzy (1) - CW
MeDeFe (1) - GEQ
Don't blame me if its wrong, but credit me if it's right!
This one clears skittles:pmchugh wrote:Vote Count!
walrus 1- (falko)
falko 3- (suspect, fircoal, cowboyz)
With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.
Deadline is soon so hurry up peeps.
This one clears cena:pmchugh wrote:Vote Count!
walrus 1- (falko)
falko 1- (suspect)
masterchief 1- (naxus)
mr squirrel 1- (skittles)
With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.
DEADLINE 48 HOURS!!!!!!
And this one clears stroop:pmchugh wrote:Deadline may be extened for replacements.
Vote Count!
strokem 1- (cena)
walrus 1- (falko)
falko 1- (suspect)
masterchief 1- (naxus)
mr squirrel 1- (skittles)
no lynch 2- (e_i_pi)
With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.
SEAsportsfan and masterchief are being replaced
Fixed.
Well, thats all 8 players on the bandwagon. So unless Pmc got one of those votes wrong, we can assume that Falko was telling the truth. If there is a voteless townie, he would have to be someone else who didn't jump on the bandwagon.pmchugh wrote:Vote count!
skittles 2- (stroke, SEA)
stroop 1- (mr. squirrel)
cowboyz 1- (naxus)
suspect- 1 (stroop)
cena 1- (fuzzy)
With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.
pmchugh wrote: If I wasn't lazy, I would sig that