Well, thats all 8 players on the bandwagon. So unless Pmc got one of those votes wrong, we can assume that Falko was telling the truth. If there is a voteless townie, he would have to be someone else who didn't jump on the bandwagon.
captainwalrus wrote:Didn't e_i_pi already claim to be double voting?
Whatever.
What makes people think that I am mafia?
I made a case against you, it was a few posts before your scum buddies MeDeFe and cena started gasbagging about finding a voteless townie to draw attention away from your scumminess
captainwalrus wrote:Didn't e_i_pi already claim to be double voting?
Whatever.
What makes people think that I am mafia?
I made a case against you, it was a few posts before your scum buddies MeDeFe and cena started gasbagging about finding a voteless townie to draw attention away from your scumminess
e_i_pi, you're giving me a headache with your accusations, and not because they're factual (because they aren't) but because there's no good reason for them. I said to find the voteless townie so we could confirm whether Falko's claim was correct or not as well as reduce the list of suspects by one. If you feel that detracts from your campaign (no matter how strong a case you may or may not have) against CW, well, I'm soo sorry for you. I'm not going to go along with everyone else's lines of reasoning if I see a possibility to get the town closer to winning, but instead put my ideas and methods up for debate.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Cowboyz only real argument was that I was too lucky in picking naxus. Other than that he just said that we should lynch me since we have a lynch to waste and it would conferm or deny other stories. That is a terrible reason to lynch a bulletproof bodygaurd.
e_i_pi I already responded to.
The only real argument is that I seem too lucky in picking naxus.
Cowboyz only real argument was that I was too lucky in picking naxus. Other than that he just said that we should lynch me since we have a lynch to waste and it would conferm or deny other stories. That is a terrible reason to lynch a bulletproof bodygaurd.
e_i_pi I already responded to.
The only real argument is that I seem too lucky in picking naxus.
I think I already said my thoughts on those accusations earlier. I have to say, I'm not convinced. I have to admit that he is a little scummy but your case seems too weak for my liking. He claims to be a bulletproof bodyguard. To lose him would be a major loss for the town. I would like to see more evidence against CW before anyone else places a vote against him. Anyone who votes at this point is just bandwagoning for the sake of it.
And cowboy's idea that we have a mislynch to use is retarded. Just because we didn't lose anyone day 1 doesn't mean we should be careless day two, or any day for that matter.
And also unvote since we are no longer doing the vote experiment.
uh... has anyone else noticed that we have a few lurkers... I say we lynch one of them.
one of which is skittles who hasn't posted since like the beginning of day one... He seems to be active in several other forums/threads though.
another is the noob naxus who said he doesn't have much to input a while back. all he seems to contribute is long lists of quoted posts to organize things like who claimed what in each order or to prove/disprove that there is a voteless townie. fircoal is also a big lurker. he hasn't posted since night 1 and that was on the subject of if suspect was premium when he was banned or not...
so we have a list of three lurkers... anyone care to form an argument against one or all of them? I may try later, but this is just my thoughts on lurkers.
Cowboyz only real argument was that I was too lucky in picking naxus. Other than that he just said that we should lynch me since we have a lynch to waste and it would conferm or deny other stories. That is a terrible reason to lynch a bulletproof bodygaurd.
e_i_pi I already responded to.
The only real argument is that I seem too lucky in picking naxus.
But it's not only to be lucky. It's the fact that, been extremely lucky, your tale can be perfectly a lie, and the eipi claim cover the naxus survival. So, we can dispense your story without any problem. Your story can be taken as a blatant lie, and still the facts don't show us the opposite
strokem1257 wrote:uh... has anyone else noticed that we have a few lurkers... I say we lynch one of them.
one of which is skittles who hasn't posted since like the beginning of day one... He seems to be active in several other forums/threads though.
another is the noob naxus who said he doesn't have much to input a while back. all he seems to contribute is long lists of quoted posts to organize things like who claimed what in each order or to prove/disprove that there is a voteless townie. fircoal is also a big lurker. he hasn't posted since night 1 and that was on the subject of if suspect was premium when he was banned or not...
so we have a list of three lurkers... anyone care to form an argument against one or all of them? I may try later, but this is just my thoughts on lurkers.
at least i have posted somewhat normally and havnt been like the other two and not posted in like 6-7 pages
unvote
Haggis_McMutton wrote:2. Anyone else find it kind of funny that naxus is NK'd right after insisting that we're all paranoid?
strokem1257 wrote:uh... has anyone else noticed that we have a few lurkers... I say we lynch one of them.
one of which is skittles who hasn't posted since like the beginning of day one... He seems to be active in several other forums/threads though.
another is the noob naxus who said he doesn't have much to input a while back. all he seems to contribute is long lists of quoted posts to organize things like who claimed what in each order or to prove/disprove that there is a voteless townie. fircoal is also a big lurker. he hasn't posted since night 1 and that was on the subject of if suspect was premium when he was banned or not...
so we have a list of three lurkers... anyone care to form an argument against one or all of them? I may try later, but this is just my thoughts on lurkers.
Well, he found out the eipi is a double voter, I'd say that's quite productive.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Cowboyz only real argument was that I was too lucky in picking naxus. Other than that he just said that we should lynch me since we have a lynch to waste and it would conferm or deny other stories. That is a terrible reason to lynch a bulletproof bodygaurd.
e_i_pi I already responded to.
The only real argument is that I seem too lucky in picking naxus.
But it's not only to be lucky. It's the fact that, been extremely lucky, your tale can be perfectly a lie, and the eipi claim cover the naxus survival. So, we can dispense your story without any problem. Your story can be taken as a blatant lie, and still the facts don't show us the opposite
I claimed before e_i_pi did, just pointing that out.
And you all mean to tell me that no doctor has ever protected the right person on night one? It was a good guess, I don't see what is scummy about that.
Crazyirishman wrote:Maybe we should move to the night phase.
I disagree. I want a little more time to sort everything out and get everyone's opinion since we have some lurkers who have not said who they think is scummy.
strokem1257 wrote:uh... has anyone else noticed that we have a few lurkers... I say we lynch one of them.
one of which is skittles who hasn't posted since like the beginning of day one... He seems to be active in several other forums/threads though.
another is the noob naxus who said he doesn't have much to input a while back. all he seems to contribute is long lists of quoted posts to organize things like who claimed what in each order or to prove/disprove that there is a voteless townie. fircoal is also a big lurker. he hasn't posted since night 1 and that was on the subject of if suspect was premium when he was banned or not...
so we have a list of three lurkers... anyone care to form an argument against one or all of them? I may try later, but this is just my thoughts on lurkers.
Good point about fircoal, where is he hiding at. He practically lives in the mafia forums.
Bump.
This is going too slow. Skittles seems to be absent in every mafia game. Fircoal just seems to be lurking so I'll vote fircoal. I don't think naxus was really lurking all that much.
We need to keep this game moving. Day 1 was a bore and we had nothing good to show of night 1. Now its slowing down again for day 2. I personally don't see a strong enough case against CW but if it will finally get this game going on a decent pace, go ahead and lynch him. Otherwise, I say we just target a lurker and see if he is willing to come out of hiding long enough to save his sorry ass.
Mr. Squirrel wrote:Bump.
This is going too slow. Skittles seems to be absent in every mafia game. Fircoal just seems to be lurking so I'll vote fircoal. I don't think naxus was really lurking all that much.
We need to keep this game moving. Day 1 was a bore and we had nothing good to show of night 1. Now its slowing down again for day 2. I personally don't see a strong enough case against CW but if it will finally get this game going on a decent pace, go ahead and lynch him. Otherwise, I say we just target a lurker and see if he is willing to come out of hiding long enough to save his sorry ass.
I am tending to agree with you there squirrel. I know fircoal is still active on the site since I talk to him occasionally on msn and such. he just doesn't seem to be posting. . . cant remember if I am voting somewhere so Unvote Vote fircoal for being a scummy looking lurker.
