Hitler didn't start WWII (spilt thread)

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
jsholty4690
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 3:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Peoria, IL

Hitler didn't start WWII (spilt thread)

Post by jsholty4690 »

Techincally, the Japanese started it in 1933 with the invasion of Manchuria, but that's probably what your not going at.

Let me guess, your saying if the British and French hadn't of declared war on Germany after it invaded Poland in September 1939 WWII never would have happened? Your using the logic that says, why did they declare war on Germany to aid Polan, but failed to aid the Polish in the defense of their homeland. So because they didn't aid Poland it is their fault that nearly 60 million people died over the next six years?

If that is what your going at, your mind is warped. But do I have a question for you, do you think Germany would have stopped expanding after they got Danzig?
Image
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12727
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by muy_thaiguy »

_Anton_ wrote:
jsholty4690 wrote:Techincally, the Japanese started it in 1933 with the invasion of Manchuria, but that's probably what your not going at.

Let me guess, your saying if the British and French hadn't of declared war on Germany after it invaded Poland in September 1939 WWII never would have happened? Your using the logic that says, why did they declare war on Germany to aid Polan, but failed to aid the Polish in the defense of their homeland. So because they didn't aid Poland it is their fault that nearly 60 million people died over the next six years?

If that is what your going at, your mind is warped. But do I have a question for you, do you think Germany would have stopped expanding after they got Danzig?

Hitler wanted to take a chunk of Russia, thinking he could use the land better than the Russians were. The Germans wanted to march through, not into Poland.

So, the alliance (short as it was) between them to divide Poland up never happened?
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Hologram
Posts: 345
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:49 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Armpit of America

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by Hologram »

muy_thaiguy wrote:
_Anton_ wrote:
jsholty4690 wrote:Techincally, the Japanese started it in 1933 with the invasion of Manchuria, but that's probably what your not going at.

Let me guess, your saying if the British and French hadn't of declared war on Germany after it invaded Poland in September 1939 WWII never would have happened? Your using the logic that says, why did they declare war on Germany to aid Polan, but failed to aid the Polish in the defense of their homeland. So because they didn't aid Poland it is their fault that nearly 60 million people died over the next six years?

If that is what your going at, your mind is warped. But do I have a question for you, do you think Germany would have stopped expanding after they got Danzig?

Hitler wanted to take a chunk of Russia, thinking he could use the land better than the Russians were. The Germans wanted to march through, not into Poland.

So, the alliance (short as it was) between them to divide Poland up never happened?

It's called being diplomatic to work toward your own ends.

Hitler knew that neither France, England, nor Russia would stand for his invasion of Poland, so he worked out a compromise with Russia to reduce one front, intending to come back later for the entirety of Poland and the rest of Eastern Europe after dealing with France and England.

Unfortunately, the English got lucky a few times too many, so Hitler, presumably in one of his manic states, decided, with France gone and a decent defense on the Atlantic, that the Western Front was gone and that he could go up against Russia, so he did, but only after Mussolini dragged him into Africa, forcing him to wait until the winter to invade Russia, which, like Napoleon, proved to be his downfall.


In any case, he should've gone for the oil fields of the Middle East before entering Russia. They would've been easier to take and would've provided him with more than enough oil to further his war machine.

But what's done is done.
The inflation rate in Zimbabwe just hit 4 million percent. Some people say it is only 165,000, but they are just being stupid. -Scott Adams, artist and writer of Dilbert
User avatar
Frigidus
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 2:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by Frigidus »

I'm confused, how is it Hitler didn't start WWII? Do you mean that he didn't declare war on the major allied powers? Sure, but he certainly was the one that provoked the war, and he knew that his actions would result in war.
User avatar
RedBaron0
Posts: 2657
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 1:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by RedBaron0 »

Hitler was a megalomaniac with psychopathic and schizophrenic tenancies who gained power during a period of unprecedented economic depression over a country with fantastic industrial, economic and military capability. He is the cause of the deadliest military conflict of the modern era. I don't give a shit who started the war.
ImageImage
KuppenTruppen
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:52 pm

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by KuppenTruppen »

Hitler did not cause World War Two!
Gaze upon the Face of Evil!
Image
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''GAVRILO PRINCIP''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
User avatar
Gypsys Kiss
Posts: 1038
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:23 pm
Gender: Male
Location: In a darkened room, beyond the reach of Gods faith

Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by Gypsys Kiss »

KuppenTruppen wrote:Hitler did not cause World War Two!
Gaze upon the Face of Evil!
Image
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''GAVRILO PRINCIP''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''


I think you'll find thats World War One...........and no he didnt really.........

There was always going to be a war between Austro-Hungary and Serbia. Franz Ferdinands assasination just made it happen quicker. If Russia hadnt of stood behind Serbia it would have stayed a 'localised' war.
Last edited by Gypsys Kiss on Sun Aug 23, 2009 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Carebian Knight
Posts: 284
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Central Missouri

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by Carebian Knight »

Gypsys Kiss wrote:
KuppenTruppen wrote:Hitler did not cause World War Two!
Gaze upon the Face of Evil!
Image
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''GAVRILO PRINCIP''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''


I think you'll find thats World War One...........and no he didnt really.........


I think he's going for Gavrilo's actions led to WWI and WWI pretty much set the stage for WWII.
User avatar
Serbia
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Detroit

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by Serbia »

Carebian Knight wrote:I think he's going for Gavrilo's actions led to WWI and WWI pretty much set the stage for WWII.


In that case, I blame Charlemange.

Image
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Gypsys Kiss
Posts: 1038
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:23 pm
Gender: Male
Location: In a darkened room, beyond the reach of Gods faith

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by Gypsys Kiss »

Serbia wrote:
Carebian Knight wrote:I think he's going for Gavrilo's actions led to WWI and WWI pretty much set the stage for WWII.


In that case, I blame Charlemange.

Image


Nah......most certainly Serbias fault
Image
User avatar
jsholty4690
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 3:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Peoria, IL

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by jsholty4690 »

If we're blaming people, I blame Otto von Bismarck.
Image
Image
User avatar
jsholty4690
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 3:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Peoria, IL

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by jsholty4690 »

Gypsys Kiss wrote:
Serbia wrote:
Carebian Knight wrote:I think he's going for Gavrilo's actions led to WWI and WWI pretty much set the stage for WWII.


In that case, I blame Charlemange.

Image


Nah......most certainly Serbias fault


I blame Austria's demands on Serbia
Image
User avatar
Serbia
Posts: 12267
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Detroit

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by Serbia »

Serbia can actually be blamed for a lot of things.
Both the country, and myself. But we're ok with that.
CONFUSED? YOU'LL KNOW WHEN YOU'RE RIPE
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
User avatar
Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Contact:

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by Qwert »

Austria want war-so they create ultimatum what no one sovereing country can not accept.

Back on WWII-England sign with Poland Alliance,before Germany attack, but they dont have power to react against Germany,who like everybody know prepare last 5 or 6 years for war,and create many new and sopfisticated weapons, much better and stronger then France and England.
Who know what will hepend if germany not attack Soviet Union.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
Gypsys Kiss
Posts: 1038
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 3:23 pm
Gender: Male
Location: In a darkened room, beyond the reach of Gods faith

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by Gypsys Kiss »

jsholty4690 wrote:
I blame Austria's demands on Serbia


The demands were made after the assasination. Now, if Serbia wanted to avoid war, they shot the one man who could possibly have stopped it. Franz Ferdinand probably couldn't have stopped a localised war, but without him there was no chance.......ergo Serbias fault.
Image
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 3:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by MeDeFe »

qwert wrote:Austria want war-so they create ultimatum what no one sovereing country can not accept.

Back on WWII-England sign with Poland Alliance,before Germany attack, but they dont have power to react against Germany,who like everybody know prepare last 5 or 6 years for war,and create many new and sopfisticated weapons, much better and stronger then France and England.
Who know what will hepend if germany not attack Soviet Union.

Then the USSR would probably have attacked Germany a little later.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
jsholty4690
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 3:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Peoria, IL

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by jsholty4690 »

Gypsys Kiss wrote:
jsholty4690 wrote:
I blame Austria's demands on Serbia


The demands were made after the assasination. Now, if Serbia wanted to avoid war, they shot the one man who could possibly have stopped it. Franz Ferdinand probably couldn't have stopped a localised war, but without him there was no chance.......ergo Serbias fault.


"If I hadn't done it the Germans would have found another excuse."
Princips' last words. Which if you think about it is absolutely true.
Image
AAFitz
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by AAFitz »

Hitler is dead.

He embarrassed himself, his nation, his family, and the human race. It is shameful that it took so long, and so many lives for him to be dead, but as sinful as it is, its nice to know that such an evil man was brought to justice, and is the target of possibly more hatred than any other man that has ever walked the face of the earth.

Saddam is dead too. =D>
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
User avatar
gannable
Posts: 946
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 11:31 pm
Location: basement

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by gannable »

he's right,
the jesuit order orchestrated it all
User avatar
Qwert
SoC Training Adviser
Posts: 9262
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 5:07 pm
Location: VOJVODINA
Contact:

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by Qwert »

Then the USSR would probably have attacked Germany a little later.

probably,but then casualty will be even more huge, because German will exterminate more people.
Image
NEW REVOLUTION-NEW RANKS PRESS THESE LINK viewtopic.php?f=471&t=47578&start=0
User avatar
jsholty4690
Posts: 145
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 3:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Peoria, IL

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by jsholty4690 »

AAFitz wrote:Hitler is dead.

He embarrassed himself, his nation, his family, and the human race. It is shameful that it took so long, and so many lives for him to be dead, but as sinful as it is, its nice to know that such an evil man was brought to justice, and is the target of possibly more hatred than any other man that has ever walked the face of the earth.

Saddam is dead too. =D>


Too bad the Inglorius Basterds weren't real. That would have been a cool way to have had Hitler killed and it would have saved a lot of lives in the consentration camps and on the front. But, one can always dream.
Image
User avatar
RedBaron0
Posts: 2657
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 1:59 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by RedBaron0 »

If we're going that route... going back and back blaming previous wars as partial causes for the following ones.

Then I blame Eve. :P ;)
ImageImage
Rustovitch
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 6:07 pm

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by Rustovitch »

KuppenTruppen wrote:Hitler did not cause World War Two!
Gaze upon the Face of Evil!
Image
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''GAVRILO PRINCIP''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''


Idiot.
BoganGod
Posts: 5873
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:08 am
Gender: Male
Location: Heaven's Gate Retirement Home

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by BoganGod »

The argument could be made the the treaty of Versailles after the 1st world war, forced germany into a position where they had to fight or be a 3rd rate nation. The punitive actions of the allies contributed to the german peoples willingness to go to war.
Image
KuppenTruppen
Posts: 0
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 1:52 pm

Re: Hitler didn't start WWII

Post by KuppenTruppen »

Rustovitch wrote:
KuppenTruppen wrote:Hitler did not cause World War Two!
Gaze upon the Face of Evil!
Image
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''GAVRILO PRINCIP''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''


Idiot.

Troll.

Anyways, I would like to argue that Hitler did in fact start WWII. The British and French had already stated their commitment to Polish Independence, yet Hitler still went ahead with Fall Weiss. Later on, Hitler decided Operation Barbarossa was a good idea and attacked the Soviets. I fail to see how WWII was not Hitler's fault. It is not as if the Germans had a dire need for Lebensraum, and they had already revitalized the economy and abandoned the Treaty of Versailles, without any international consequence. I don't really see WWII happening without Hitler's aggressive foreign policy.

Edit: Gavrilo Princip being responsible for WWII was only a joke, although one could claim he was by saying that he caused WWI --> Versailles --> Impoverished Germany --> Radical Ideology --> National Socialists in Reichstag --> WWII.)
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”