Moderator: Community Team

Actually in Britain it seems most people want the death penalty, it was only done away with on the understanding that formerly 'capital' offenses would result in permanent incarceration... which is NOT the case.jbrettlip wrote:You americans always want to kill, kill, kill. Why can't you be more like us enlightened Europeans who have abolished the death penalty? We are so much smarter than you.
That is such a load of shit. 100% made-up and untrue.Rustovitch wrote:Actually in Britain it seems most people want the death penalty,
If memory serves me well, that is what happened to Jeffery Domer. He was put into gen. pop and ended up getting shanked.clapper011 wrote:hopefully this happens (gen.pop)and the same or worse fate is bestowed to them what they did to that innocent little baby girl!
jeffrey dahmer if i remember was put in gen pop, and shortly thereafter, like a day or so was not exactly shanked but rather was brutally raped with a mop handle, i also believe a guard lost his job over this for being somehow involvedjsholty4690 wrote:If memory serves me well, that is what happened to Jeffery Domer. He was put into gen. pop and ended up getting shanked.clapper011 wrote:hopefully this happens (gen.pop)and the same or worse fate is bestowed to them what they did to that innocent little baby girl!
It's a shame what our justice system has become. If I remember correctly a rapist got off in Vermont a couple years ago with 1 year in prison and that was before it was appealed.
Welcome to the Middle-Ages, Population: Rustovitch.Rustovitch wrote:When someone has been caught bang to rights having murdered an innocent then I just see them as nothing more than a source of organs or a test subject for a new drug, or surgical technique.
Thank you for your reasoned and rational counter-argument. I am so glad that you did not dismiss me with an ad hominen attack!MrWainthrope wrote:Welcome to the Middle-Ages, Population: Rustovitch.Rustovitch wrote:When someone has been caught bang to rights having murdered an innocent then I just see them as nothing more than a source of organs or a test subject for a new drug, or surgical technique.
Oh dear me. It appears that I must have missed all of the rational original-arguments that you had anticipated would be met with rational counter-arguments.Rustovitch wrote:Thank you for your reasoned and rational counter-argument. I am so glad that you did not dismiss me with an ad hominen attack!MrWainthrope wrote:Welcome to the Middle-Ages, Population: Rustovitch.Rustovitch wrote:When someone has been caught bang to rights having murdered an innocent then I just see them as nothing more than a source of organs or a test subject for a new drug, or surgical technique.
I am sorry, but I can't always help myself!Johnny Rockets wrote:Best not feed the Troll , Rustovitch.
As tempting as it is, it just spawns more or of the multi bastards. Antagonistic little shits, arn't they?
Johnny Rockets
I am very much impressed by the adult way in which you deal with people who have the temerity to hold different opinions to you. A lesser man would have got on his high horse, puffed out his manly chest and would have ranted with aristocratic disdain and a peppering of personal insults. I think you are wonderful.MrWainthrope wrote:Oh dear me. It appears that I must have missed all of the rational original-arguments that you had anticipated would be met with rational counter-arguments.Rustovitch wrote:Thank you for your reasoned and rational counter-argument. I am so glad that you did not dismiss me with an ad hominen attack!MrWainthrope wrote:Welcome to the Middle-Ages, Population: Rustovitch.Rustovitch wrote:When someone has been caught bang to rights having murdered an innocent then I just see them as nothing more than a source of organs or a test subject for a new drug, or surgical technique.
It appears that I must have mistaken them for mere bald-assertions of inane and anachronistic personal opinions, then summarily dismissed them with precisely the level of scorn that such ridiculous notions warrant.
Tell you what, why don't you just go copy and paste all of those well thought out, rational, original-arguments that you think that you made and that I missed the first time round, then I'll respond to them civilly and with all of the academic respect that they surely deserve. That shouldn't be too hard for you to do now, should it?
I mean, you're not the kind of guy who just spews out retarded and unsupported opinions then cries when more intelligent posters dismiss them as spurious and infantile, are you?
So I notice that you didn't quote all of those original-arguments that you were crying I didn't respond to? Dare we conclude that they were never made and that you are in fact crying unjustifibly?Rustovitch wrote:I am very much impressed by the adult way in which you deal with people who have the temerity to hold different opinions to you. A lesser man would have got on his high horse, puffed out his manly chest and would have ranted with aristocratic disdain and a peppering of personal insults. I think you are wonderful.
I think it is so clever how you have responded so aggressively to something I never actually said. I think it's a wonderful tactic and I wouldn't be suprised if the entire forum does not suddenly declare you to be the King of the internet.MrWainthrope wrote: So I notice that you didn't quote all of those original-arguments that you were crying I didn't respond to? Dare we conclude that they were never made and that you are in fact crying unjustifibly?
Yes indeed that is exactly what happened.Indeed, all you appear to have done in your reply is relapsed into a sobbing fit and started throwing around precisely the kind of ridiculous personal insults that you were claiming to be so injured by.