Moderator: Community Team
everything is great but this bit here... i believe you said there are 12 or fewer members with perma-bans from the forums... i don't see why it isn't possible to re-examine these cases and give some of them lighter sentences... t-om comes to mind as well as DM and a few others... great move by team CC for the most part. but a very poor decision to not re-examine some of these perma-bans...-0AndyDufresne wrote:However, we will not be commuting any vacations.

agreedowenshooter wrote:everything is great but this bit here... i believe you said there are 12 or fewer members with perma-bans from the forums... i don't see why it isn't possible to re-examine these cases and give some of them lighter sentences... t-om comes to mind as well as DM and a few others... great move by team CC for the most part. but a very poor decision to not re-examine some of these perma-bans...-0AndyDufresne wrote:However, we will not be commuting any vacations.
notyou2 wrote:agreedowenshooter wrote:everything is great but this bit here... i believe you said there are 12 or fewer members with perma-bans from the forums... i don't see why it isn't possible to re-examine these cases and give some of them lighter sentences... t-om comes to mind as well as DM and a few others... great move by team CC for the most part. but a very poor decision to not re-examine some of these perma-bans...-0AndyDufresne wrote:However, we will not be commuting any vacations.
I criticized it soundly when that decision was made, so I'll just agree again.GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:agreednotyou2 wrote:agreedowenshooter wrote:everything is great but this bit here... i believe you said there are 12 or fewer members with perma-bans from the forums... i don't see why it isn't possible to re-examine these cases and give some of them lighter sentences... t-om comes to mind as well as DM and a few others... great move by team CC for the most part. but a very poor decision to not re-examine some of these perma-bans...-0AndyDufresne wrote:However, we will not be commuting any vacations.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.

t-o-m was also mentioned... if his maps are good enough to have on the site, i don't understand why he can't have his perma-ban re-evaluated...-0AndyDufresne wrote:For the most part, many of you are referring to Dancing Mustard. It's a moot point anyways---he was busted for Multiple accounts (Dancing Mustard, mrwainthrope) weeks ago and both accounts are inactive.
--Andy

Actually we're referring to all cases of people permabanned from the fora.AndyDufresne wrote:For the most part, many of you are referring to Dancing Mustard. It's a moot point anyways---he was busted for Multiple accounts (Dancing Mustard, mrwainthrope) weeks ago and both accounts are inactive.
--Andy
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.