12 Hour Advantage (Not 12 hour turns)

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply
notkin
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:43 pm

12 Hour Advantage (Not 12 hour turns)

Post by notkin »

When a person plays a team game the team that ended the last round has to wait for the other team to go. Because of this, if they coordinate it right, they could not go until there is only a few minutes left until the round is up, forcing the other team to miss their turn.

I know this is a strategy for some, but I think it is rather unfair. I propose that the team that ended the last round can not go until the other team goes or until the round has gone on for 12 hours, which ever comes first.
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 11:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Post by wcaclimbing »

no
Image
User avatar
wcaclimbing
Posts: 5598
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 11:09 pm
Location: In your quantum box....Maybe.
Contact:

Post by wcaclimbing »

no
Image
Marxwell
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:15 pm

Post by Marxwell »

I had proposed a different solution to the same problem:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12047

both solutions seem good to me, at least better than the way it currently is...
hawkeye
Posts: 2663
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:19 am
Location: RAGGLE FRAGGLE!!!

Re: 12 Hour Advantage (Not 12 hour turns)

Post by hawkeye »

notkin wrote:When a person plays a team game the team that ended the last round has to wait for the other team to go. Because of this, if they coordinate it right, they could not go until there is only a few minutes left until the round is up, forcing the other team to miss their turn.

I know this is a strategy for some, but I think it is rather unfair. I propose that the team that ended the last round can not go until the other team goes or until the round has gone on for 12 hours, which ever comes first.


Jump off a cliff, mountain, or tall building whichever is most convenient. Do this as quickly as you can.
Marxwell
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:15 pm

Post by Marxwell »

I don't see where the problem with his suggestion is... if nobody likes his solution, what do you guys think of mine?
notkin
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:43 pm

Post by notkin »

im cool with u guys not liking it but say why
hawkeye
Posts: 2663
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 12:19 am
Location: RAGGLE FRAGGLE!!!

Post by hawkeye »

It may look cheesy, but it's actually a real strategy. If it isn't a secret alliance or multi account it's legal.
User avatar
shaddowfire
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 9:07 am

Post by shaddowfire »

It may be legeal, but it's exploiting a weakness in the coding. It's not really withine the game of risk. The real problem is when the one team plays, then they end their turn they get to go 1st in the next round, essentialy doubling up on their turns. It's a cheap way to force the opposing team to lose a turn and possibly their armies. (Yes they get them doubled, but maybe I held Europe, but then the other team, doubles their turn, they get into my well defended position, and then I lose 4 armies).

I really like this idea. Risk isn't about being an ass to players, or exploiting dumn shit. I think we should fix it so people can't take advantages of flaws in the coding. To put this in perspective, I would equate this flaw to someone finding a way to hack lacks server and forcing his account to always roll 6's. That also is exploiting the game, just at a more direct way.
Blades will bleed. Shields will shatter. But as the light fades, will the hero rise again or will darkness reign?

~Twilight Princess
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Post by yeti_c »

hawkeye wrote:It may look cheesy, but it's actually a real strategy. If it isn't a secret alliance or multi account it's legal.


It may be a real strategy but it's lame - be a man and accept that this should be coded out of freestyle.

C.
User avatar
gavin_sidhu
Posts: 1428
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 7:16 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Post by gavin_sidhu »

hawkeye wrote:It may look cheesy, but it's actually a real strategy. If it isn't a secret alliance or multi account it's legal.
Thats stupid, i totally support notkins suggestion
User avatar
ericisshort
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:02 pm
Location: oklahoma

Post by ericisshort »

I agree that it is a really cheap move and it really shouldnt be allowed.

It is definitely a REAL strategy for some which means its a REAL problem for all the rest. Its happened to me and I've done it to someone by accident because me and my team couldnt coordinate our turn till near the 24 hour mark.

There should be an if statement somewhere in the code that if the time remaining < [fair amount] that the time remaining is reset to [fair amount] once team A starts their turn.[/code]
User avatar
Forza AZ
Posts: 4546
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:27 am
Gender: Male
Location: Alkmaar, Netherlands

Post by Forza AZ »

Marxwell wrote:I had proposed a different solution to the same problem:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12047

both solutions seem good to me, at least better than the way it currently is...

I have a slightly different suggestion for this (at least I think it is slightly different, you could mean the same?). I think the 24 hours should start at the moment you can take your turn. So for the player/team that ended a turn, the 24 hours should start at the moment another player/team starts his/their turn in the next rouns, while for the other players/teams it should stay like it is now.
User avatar
RobinJ
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:56 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Post by RobinJ »

Notkin - your idea is stupid - forget it - why would we want to make our games last longer than they already do? I agree that something needs to be done about this but what you have suggested is not the way to go about it.
notkin
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:43 pm

Post by notkin »

The games wouldnt last any longer than they do now, not with my suggestion. My suggestion means the round ends in 24 hours still, it just means anyone can play after 12.

In Forza AZ (not saying anything against your idea, just clearing up whose idea is whose) I believe the games could last 48 hours but in mine they would still last 24 hous at most.
Marxwell
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:15 pm

Post by Marxwell »

Yeah, Forza's idea and mine allows the turn to last up to 48h, that's true. For me that's not at all a problem, but if for some reason you people find this to be a real problem then there's definately notkin's solution which works and doesn't make turns last longer....

Like someone before said, I've already accidentally used this too, because I couldn't coordinate with my partner fast, and really, I felt really bad for that game... it seemed like I was exploiting a bug, really shouldn't be allowed (I also didn't know it could be done, I discovered it that way).

It was right after that that I decided to create my topic in this forum :)
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”