Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changedMr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
fixed game tagnabucodonosor wrote:Accused:
fapostolo
The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Severe PM Abuse
Other: Breaking truce
Game number(s):
Game 5452610
Comments: Fapostolo is not trustworthy and resorts to secret diplomacy.
1) In game # 5452610 he broke a truce agreement (round 10) in which he promised not to attack me before giving a one turn notice (please refer to game chat line "2009-09-01 08:36:30"). He did attack though in round 18 violating the truce without the one turn warning and therefore obtained an unfair advantage in the game, which wouldn't have been possible without cheating.
2) Further than that, he contacted me by private message to propose a secret act of diplomacy, with which I did not agree, by not responding to it, for knowing that it would be against the game rules. The message was posted Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:34 pm and reads as follows: "pink is getting to strong on 5452610 i can make a peace deal with u".
3) fapostolo's backstabbing behavior is condemnable not only for his lack of fair play but also for his total disrespect for other bona fide players, as he, by the way, openly admits in the game chat ("2009-09-10 21:05:35 - fapostolo: well unfortunatly if i didnt back stab u , u would win. so go ahead and complain."). I believe this last post speaks for itself.
4) I would be very grateful if the Moderators and Hunters could do something about this guy. I think he deserves being punished for his bad manners and prevented from gaining points in the game in question.
Thank you for your consideration,
nabucodonosor
Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changedMr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
2009-09-10 18:48:38 - cachejob received 3 troops for holding ?
2009-09-10 18:48:38 - cachejob received 5 troops for 17 regions
2009-09-10 18:48:51 - cachejob deployed 2 troops on ?
2009-09-10 18:48:57 - cachejob deployed 6 troops on ?
2009-09-10 18:48:58 - cachejob assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 18:49:11 - cachejob assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 18:49:21 - cachejob reinforced ? with 1 troops from ?
2009-09-10 18:49:25 - cachejob ended the turn
2009-09-10 21:04:34 - fapostolo received 2 troops for holding ?
2009-09-10 21:04:34 - fapostolo received 3 troops for holding ?
2009-09-10 21:04:34 - fapostolo received 4 troops for holding ?
2009-09-10 21:04:34 - fapostolo received 7 troops for 22 regions
2009-09-10 21:04:50 - fapostolo deployed 16 troops on ?
2009-09-10 21:05:53 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:05:59 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:06:04 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:06:15 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:06:26 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:06:30 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:06:36 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:06:43 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:06:54 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:07:49 - fapostolo reinforced ? with 2 troops from ?
2009-09-10 21:08:15 - fapostolo reinforced ? with 2 troops from ?
2009-09-10 21:08:58 - fapostolo reinforced ? with 1 troops from ?
2009-09-10 21:09:06 - fapostolo ended the turn
Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changedMr. Squirrel wrote:One fool reporting for duty!pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
I will when the game is finished, but this isn't enough punishment for an attempt to do secret diplomacy.colton24 wrote:He can break a truce. Just tag him as backstabber.
That's the point.safariguy5 wrote:True, but secret diplomacy is against the rules.
I'm sorry but I'm not quite sure I understood your comment. Are you trying to say the game in question was fixed?colton24 wrote:fixed game tagnabucodonosor wrote:Accused:
fapostolo
The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Severe PM Abuse
Other: Breaking truce
Game number(s):
Game 5452610
Comments: Fapostolo is not trustworthy and resorts to secret diplomacy.
1) In game # 5452610 he broke a truce agreement (round 10) in which he promised not to attack me before giving a one turn notice (please refer to game chat line "2009-09-01 08:36:30"). He did attack though in round 18 violating the truce without the one turn warning and therefore obtained an unfair advantage in the game, which wouldn't have been possible without cheating.
2) Further than that, he contacted me by private message to propose a secret act of diplomacy, with which I did not agree, by not responding to it, for knowing that it would be against the game rules. The message was posted Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:34 pm and reads as follows: "pink is getting to strong on 5452610 i can make a peace deal with u".
3) fapostolo's backstabbing behavior is condemnable not only for his lack of fair play but also for his total disrespect for other bona fide players, as he, by the way, openly admits in the game chat ("2009-09-10 21:05:35 - fapostolo: well unfortunatly if i didnt back stab u , u would win. so go ahead and complain."). I believe this last post speaks for itself.
4) I would be very grateful if the Moderators and Hunters could do something about this guy. I think he deserves being punished for his bad manners and prevented from gaining points in the game in question.
Thank you for your consideration,
nabucodonosor
Well, I forwarded the PM message to the Moderator and Admins as a proof of secret diplomacy.colton24 wrote:Secret Diplomacy is a go. Last two rounds only hitting you
2009-09-10 18:48:38 - cachejob received 3 troops for holding ?
2009-09-10 18:48:38 - cachejob received 5 troops for 17 regions
2009-09-10 18:48:51 - cachejob deployed 2 troops on ?
2009-09-10 18:48:57 - cachejob deployed 6 troops on ?
2009-09-10 18:48:58 - cachejob assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 18:49:11 - cachejob assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 18:49:21 - cachejob reinforced ? with 1 troops from ?
2009-09-10 18:49:25 - cachejob ended the turn
2009-09-10 21:04:34 - fapostolo received 2 troops for holding ?
2009-09-10 21:04:34 - fapostolo received 3 troops for holding ?
2009-09-10 21:04:34 - fapostolo received 4 troops for holding ?
2009-09-10 21:04:34 - fapostolo received 7 troops for 22 regions
2009-09-10 21:04:50 - fapostolo deployed 16 troops on ?
2009-09-10 21:05:53 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:05:59 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:06:04 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:06:15 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:06:26 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:06:30 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:06:36 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:06:43 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:06:54 - fapostolo assaulted ? from ? and conquered it from nabucodonosor
2009-09-10 21:07:49 - fapostolo reinforced ? with 2 troops from ?
2009-09-10 21:08:15 - fapostolo reinforced ? with 2 troops from ?
2009-09-10 21:08:58 - fapostolo reinforced ? with 1 troops from ?
2009-09-10 21:09:06 - fapostolo ended the turn
Thanks for the suggestion. I just did that.Kotaro wrote:Forward the PM to King Achilles or AndyDufresne showing the secret diplomacy, or this will go to waste.
