Symmetry wrote:Portraying the US as being under attack from Muslim invasion, communist Democrats, and immigrants from Cuba and Mexico following an economic collapse- yeah, those are all visions of the apocalypse at the forefront of a certain political agenda at the moment.
right, but more than just being the result of a specific political outlook, this map is also offensive. It is offensive to anyone who is Muslim to suggest that the US is under attack from Muslims. And why are the Dems "Socialists" yet the Republicans are simply called "Republicans?"
A map should either offend nobody, or go balls out and do its best to offend absolutely everybody to avoid any stink of bias. Change Republicans to "Ku Klux RepubliKans." Change Bible Belt to "Trailer Trash Jesus Freaks." Change Mormons to "Quasi-Christian Polygamists." Change Republic of Texas to "Fascist Militias."
Of course, I know that the vast majority of Republicans have nothing to do with the Klan, or that most Mormons aren't polygamists, but 99.999% of the world's 1.5 billion Muslims aren't crazed fundamentalists bent on binging down America either. If the makers of this map are willing to insult the world's second largest faith, they should be willing to insult everybody else.
It could be argued that the Global Warming map pushes a view of the future that is based on science, not politics, but I don't intend to post here again so I will not try to make that argument. What's more important is that the Global Warming map does not
explicitly name and offend any one group of people. This map does, and as a result it was right for the plug to be pulled.