Moderator: Community Team
Could you also make that clear to the Americans who are confusing Rugby with football. I mean, fairs fair.muy_thaiguy wrote:Still, though, they are quite different and should not be blurred together nonchalantly.Frigidus wrote:I think he's blurring the distinction between the two in veiled disdain.muy_thaiguy wrote:Barry Bonds is in Baseball. Same with Dan Marion.
Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_F ... ted_States

I'm surprised theres even a topic with that in it....tbh though, its hardly an impressive list, about 10 countries have 15 teams each. Curling has a bigger worldwide appeal then that.muy_thaiguy wrote: Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_F ... ted_States
muy_thaiguy wrote:Barry Bonds is in Baseball. Same with Dan Marion.
Also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_F ... ted_States

whoosh. This was a joke. I used the little eye-rolling smiley... Obviously we do not fight dogs on the sidelines of games.Titanic wrote:...and yet loads of Americans bitch about the hooligans in football.That's too bad. We Americans do it on the sidelines during the football games. It's awesome.
whoosh whoosh. Since you don't know who Vick is, you are eligible for a pass on the previous remark. The claim that 'Rugby has a long history of not fighting dogs to the death' was obviously a jab at Michael Vick, who is the only American Football player known for such an act. And I used the eye-roll again, because Beckham is a dooshbag. I don't know any rugby players, or I'd have used one as an example.Titanic wrote:No idea who Vick is, but there are much better people then Beckham out there, he was just the best at merchandising himself.At least you guys produced David Beckham, he's so much less of a dooshbag than Michael Vick.
I thought we were talking about Rugby.Titanic wrote:Football is the most popular game in the world, the world cup final is watched by over 2bn people, yet it hasn't sold itself out to corporatism.That's because enough people care about football to put it on TV. Rugby players and team owners don't have to worry about those pesky fans, or endorsements, or advertising.
Who watches the rugby world cup? Edit: I found a link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7055234.stm 15.8 million people. That's about one-sixth of the number of viewers of the Super Bowl. http://blogs.tampabay.com/media/2009/02 ... -view.htmlTitanic wrote:The rugby world cup possibly....? I have no idea who won the super bowl (even though I watched it), but Arizona Cardinal lost right? Btw, what state in the USA has a larger population then the UK?The world stage? Where is that exactly? How come no one in America knows the name of the reigning Rugby world champions? I bet even you know who won the Super Bowl this year.
And pretty much every state has a team, or two, or dozens, depending on whether you're talking college or NFL. Also, keep in mind, we have individual states that dwarf your little nation in area and population.

This list is WIN. Good ones Symmetry.Symmetry wrote:Is it time for another top ten? I think it might well be:
10) Rugby players don't need the lines numbered to tell them where they are.
9) Rugby games don't stop when someone gets pushed over. On the contrary- that's when the big guys pile in.
8 ) If betting on dog fighting so rare in American football, how come stadiums advertise that they have the hot dogs?
7) Do the New York Jets even play in New York?
6) Oliver Stone will never make a movie about rugby.
5) One sport has the Oakland Raiders. The other does not.
4) Rugby referees generally avoid all forms of mime and interpretive dance while explaining penalty decisions. Flag on the play! It's a man in a box? He's climbing a ladder? 5 yard penalty!
3) Rugby teams buy players. American football teams that do badly get to draft the best new players from college. That, my friends, is communism.
2) Rugby teams almost always have a couple of hookers on the field. If that's not a perk, I don't know what is.
1) When a rugby team scores, it's not considered a good idea to replace all the players.

Awesome- I was getting a bit worried that I might have pissed you off- not my intention at all- I love the NFL.72o wrote:This list is WIN. Good ones Symmetry.Symmetry wrote:Is it time for another top ten? I think it might well be:
10) Rugby players don't need the lines numbered to tell them where they are.
9) Rugby games don't stop when someone gets pushed over. On the contrary- that's when the big guys pile in.
8 ) If betting on dog fighting so rare in American football, how come stadiums advertise that they have the hot dogs?
7) Do the New York Jets even play in New York?
6) Oliver Stone will never make a movie about rugby.
5) One sport has the Oakland Raiders. The other does not.
4) Rugby referees generally avoid all forms of mime and interpretive dance while explaining penalty decisions. Flag on the play! It's a man in a box? He's climbing a ladder? 5 yard penalty!
3) Rugby teams buy players. American football teams that do badly get to draft the best new players from college. That, my friends, is communism.
2) Rugby teams almost always have a couple of hookers on the field. If that's not a perk, I don't know what is.
1) When a rugby team scores, it's not considered a good idea to replace all the players.

Yer I read that somewhere else. How many games a season does each team play? Is it like 3 a week or something?72o wrote:No, I don't typically get pissed off on the interwebz, if I don't like it I just don't read it. The first list was disparaging to America's real favorite pastime (does anyone even follow baseball anymore? the season is like 2000 games long!) without being funny. The second was funny, without leaving me any good comebacks.
Not all teams do. Many teams (for example the Florida Marlins) sell barely 10,000 tickets.Titanic wrote:Thats insane...how do they manage to get large attendances for so many games?
Here goes nothing?Symmetry wrote:Still kind of hoping for a top ten on why AF is awesome though.
72o wrote:
Who watches the rugby world cup? Edit: I found a link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7055234.stm 15.8 million people. That's about one-sixth of the number of viewers of the Super Bowl. http://blogs.tampabay.com/media/2009/02 ... -view.html

Thats about 1,000 right?DAZMCFC wrote:72o wrote:
Who watches the rugby world cup? Edit: I found a link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/7055234.stm 15.8 million people. That's about one-sixth of the number of viewers of the Super Bowl. http://blogs.tampabay.com/media/2009/02 ... -view.html
actually that is just the British audience. then add the South African(who won it), French, Italian, Australian, New Zealand, Japanese, Argentinain, Canadian, Tongan, Western Samaon, Irish and even some Americans and many other Pacific islands and it might be a lot closer to the Super bowl figure.
Army of GOD wrote:Here goes nothing?Symmetry wrote:Still kind of hoping for a top ten on why AF is awesome though.
10. How many nipples do people fol. lowing rugby get to see during the championship?
Ahhh...if only you had used the word 'tits' instesd of nipples
9. Football players try to avoid sacks and get sacks. They promote, and discourage homosexuality simultaneously.
You've obviously never seen a scrum
8. Football's Wikipedia page is longer.
It's not the size, but what you do with it
7. I know nothing about rugby.
You dont know what you're missing
6. I signed up for Intramural Football and Club Rugby, but I didn't show up to any of the rugby practices because I didn't feel like going.
5. I'm bad at making lists.
Ditto
4. The Broncos are awesome and play FOOTBALL and not RUGBY.
3. 'Cuz we're in AMURIKA and RUGBY is for TEA-DRINKING, "PITCH"-SAYING, SHAKESPEARE-READING BRITS!!!!!!!!! (and others).
Now if you had said beer drinking, you might have been on to something
2. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fZCCAqoSwY
They were very nearly playing rugby
*drumroll*
And the number one reason why rugby...erm...FOOTBALL! is better than RUGBY:
1. So we can all laugh at how much the Detroit Lions suck!
ummm.....yep...you got me on that one

whooooopsArmy of GOD wrote:Ok...so ONE semi-popular women's sport...
Nothing more embarrassing than my younger internet personaLootifer wrote:lol at younger AoG