Timminz wrote:As per all threads about foe lists, I have just foe'd everyone who has posted in this thread.
cool i was foed by tim
Moderator: Community Team
Timminz wrote:As per all threads about foe lists, I have just foe'd everyone who has posted in this thread.
Timminz wrote:As per all threads about foe lists, I have just foe'd everyone who has posted in this thread.
you have me foed, and we haven't even played a game together..obliterationXobliterationX wrote:It's much better to play team games against said players than to constantly play high-ranked players (of whom I already have the unique defeats), to get medals.prismsaber wrote:It's better to get beat down by better players and at least learn from them then put them on your foe list you pansy. Playing cooks in team games is also an inefficient and limited way of gaining points. Freestyle is better for that.obliterationX wrote:I fully agree.Timminz wrote:It's not the size of your foe list that matters. It's how you use it.
What better way to utilize a perfectly legal site feature than to use it to help you rank up!?
Don't assume I'm trying to avoid them because of fear - it's just wasted time to play the same high-rankers more than once!
Same here Tisha, so it doesn't have anything to do with rank...Tisha wrote:you have me foed, and we haven't even played a game together..obliterationXobliterationX wrote:It's much better to play team games against said players than to constantly play high-ranked players (of whom I already have the unique defeats), to get medals.prismsaber wrote:It's better to get beat down by better players and at least learn from them then put them on your foe list you pansy. Playing cooks in team games is also an inefficient and limited way of gaining points. Freestyle is better for that.obliterationX wrote:I fully agree.Timminz wrote:It's not the size of your foe list that matters. It's how you use it.
What better way to utilize a perfectly legal site feature than to use it to help you rank up!?
Don't assume I'm trying to avoid them because of fear - it's just wasted time to play the same high-rankers more than once!
Tisha wrote:you have me foed, and we haven't even played a game together..obliterationXobliterationX wrote:It's much better to play team games against said players than to constantly play high-ranked players (of whom I already have the unique defeats), to get medals.prismsaber wrote:It's better to get beat down by better players and at least learn from them then put them on your foe list you pansy. Playing cooks in team games is also an inefficient and limited way of gaining points. Freestyle is better for that.obliterationX wrote:I fully agree.Timminz wrote:It's not the size of your foe list that matters. It's how you use it.
What better way to utilize a perfectly legal site feature than to use it to help you rank up!?
Don't assume I'm trying to avoid them because of fear - it's just wasted time to play the same high-rankers more than once!

We've already covered that in this thread.jakewilliams wrote:Same here Tisha, so it doesn't have anything to do with rank...Tisha wrote:you have me foed, and we haven't even played a game together..obliterationX
Timminz wrote:Exactly! If you just foe everyone better than you, you'll never lose!obliterationX wrote:What better way to utilize a perfectly legal site feature than to use it to help you rank up!?
Timminz wrote:We've already covered that in this thread.jakewilliams wrote:Same here Tisha, so it doesn't have anything to do with rank...Tisha wrote:you have me foed, and we haven't even played a game together..obliterationX
Timminz wrote:Exactly! If you just foe everyone better than you, you'll never lose!obliterationX wrote:What better way to utilize a perfectly legal site feature than to use it to help you rank up!?

0 nowlord voldemort wrote:i know of 7 people....All but one of these is because of me beating them.

lord voldemort wrote:0 nowlord voldemort wrote:i know of 7 people....All but one of these is because of me beating them.
I believe that since I am on your listobliterationX wrote:Five? Ten? Twenty, or possibly even more?! Perhaps you don't feel the need to use the foe list and you would prefer to leave it clean. However many foes you have, please share it here for everyone's enjoyment!
Currently, I have 1,652 foes.
Thanks, and
That is why you are CC's finest.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I believe that since I am on your listobliterationX wrote:Five? Ten? Twenty, or possibly even more?! Perhaps you don't feel the need to use the foe list and you would prefer to leave it clean. However many foes you have, please share it here for everyone's enjoyment!
Currently, I have 1,652 foes.
Thanks, andI personally have 0 players. I dont really care who I play of who joins my games.
ronc8649 wrote:herndawg wrote:Zero
but I am getting on quite a few after trying out single player games. It seems it is fairly standard to foe people that beat you or join your two player games more than once.
I don't think I have gotten foed after loosing to someone though, which happens a lot
DONT JOIN 4 GAMES OF SOMEONES. only join one.
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I believe that since I am on your listobliterationX wrote:Five? Ten? Twenty, or possibly even more?! Perhaps you don't feel the need to use the foe list and you would prefer to leave it clean. However many foes you have, please share it here for everyone's enjoyment!
Currently, I have 1,652 foes.
Thanks, andI personally have 0 players. I dont really care who I play of who joins my games.
you left me 3 negative BS feedbacks on the old feedback system that had to be removed. Thats why you were on ignore and you knew that. The link is still there with your BS responses. As I said, nobody is currently on my list.ronc8649 wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I believe that since I am on your listobliterationX wrote:Five? Ten? Twenty, or possibly even more?! Perhaps you don't feel the need to use the foe list and you would prefer to leave it clean. However many foes you have, please share it here for everyone's enjoyment!
Currently, I have 1,652 foes.
Thanks, andI personally have 0 players. I dont really care who I play of who joins my games.
this is a fucking lie. when i first came onto cc, jr would quit all games that anyone other than established players would join.
nice try though jr. and yes, i will never play another game with this &%$#$bag.
jr. those were the reasons for the ratings. you and dupa both did it. you wouldnt play with anyone you didnt know. it is ok. just dont lie.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:you left me 3 negative BS feedbacks on the old feedback system that had to be removed. Thats why you were on ignore and you knew that. The link is still there with your BS responses. As I said, nobody is currently on my list.ronc8649 wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I believe that since I am on your listobliterationX wrote:Five? Ten? Twenty, or possibly even more?! Perhaps you don't feel the need to use the foe list and you would prefer to leave it clean. However many foes you have, please share it here for everyone's enjoyment!
Currently, I have 1,652 foes.
Thanks, andI personally have 0 players. I dont really care who I play of who joins my games.
this is a fucking lie. when i first came onto cc, jr would quit all games that anyone other than established players would join.
nice try though jr. and yes, i will never play another game with this &%$#$bag.
Yeah, but I don't play that many and every public team game I start has a JR24 in it. Nothing personally against your play, but I do like some variety in my opponents.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I believe that since I am on your listobliterationX wrote:Five? Ten? Twenty, or possibly even more?! Perhaps you don't feel the need to use the foe list and you would prefer to leave it clean. However many foes you have, please share it here for everyone's enjoyment!
Currently, I have 1,652 foes.
Thanks, andI personally have 0 players. I dont really care who I play of who joins my games.

Mr Changsha wrote:Yeah, but I don't play that many and every public team game I start has a JR24 in it. Nothing personally against your play, but I do like some variety in my opponents.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I believe that since I am on your listobliterationX wrote:Five? Ten? Twenty, or possibly even more?! Perhaps you don't feel the need to use the foe list and you would prefer to leave it clean. However many foes you have, please share it here for everyone's enjoyment!
Currently, I have 1,652 foes.
Thanks, andI personally have 0 players. I dont really care who I play of who joins my games.
I've got a feeling this is why you keep getting foed.
However, I certainly don't want to foe you. How about you just skip the odd game I post up, huh?
Cue "Yah, your too scared to take me on..blah blah blah."
But in fact, It is simply that I don't like the fact that every time I post a public game I get Jr24 and another...and I KNOW I'll get JR24 and another as I post it. If I WANTED to play you I'd invite you.
*note to self: create new account and name it GamingInModeration. The sheer sight of that name will have JR24 recoiling in abject terror...JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Mr Changsha wrote:Yeah, but I don't play that many and every public team game I start has a JR24 in it. Nothing personally against your play, but I do like some variety in my opponents.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I believe that since I am on your listobliterationX wrote:Five? Ten? Twenty, or possibly even more?! Perhaps you don't feel the need to use the foe list and you would prefer to leave it clean. However many foes you have, please share it here for everyone's enjoyment!
Currently, I have 1,652 foes.
Thanks, andI personally have 0 players. I dont really care who I play of who joins my games.
I've got a feeling this is why you keep getting foed.
However, I certainly don't want to foe you. How about you just skip the odd game I post up, huh?
Cue "Yah, your too scared to take me on..blah blah blah."
But in fact, It is simply that I don't like the fact that every time I post a public game I get Jr24 and another...and I KNOW I'll get JR24 and another as I post it. If I WANTED to play you I'd invite you.
* note to self- auto join every game Mr Changsha creates
