Moderator: Community Team
1) I meant that I was wanting who LSU targeted to get a lead and it being me as ironic, not the pick itself. The contradiction being that I wanted to get a lead but obviously I wouldn't like a lead against me and in mah own mind I was bringing it on.Nzen wrote:Irony does not mean inconvenient or surprising event. Irony denotes the presence of a contradictory use or attribute of an event or concept: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/ironyFircoal wrote:How was it not ironic. I was waiting to see who LSU had targeted to get a lead only for it to be me. Isn't that irony? And if not then what's your skew idea of irony?
My previous post employs an ironic tone. Despite the sacchrine promises of agreement and understanding, the whole ought indicate that I voted for you based on your unwillingness to defend yourself. Consider the following:
Literally, it suggests that we mistakenly killed pmchugh, as well as rationalizing your mysteriousness. However, we know that town lynched him because he was proven scum with the same method used today. That clearly belies my avowal that we don't hold you responsible.We know it isn't your fault, but pmchugh tried the same sort of laid-back approach and we just plum jumped the gun on him.
To paraphrase the popular song, rain on your wedding day is not ironic. It is inconvenient, but fails to contradict the possibility or symbolism of the primarily indoor ceremony. Unless you asked LSU to not target you or perhaps you saw him targeting someone else last night, his choice falls well short of ironic.
I will admit one sincerity in my previous post. If you do happen to describe four night actions that others - or I - confirm, I will certainly unvote and defend you. However, as you ignored the opportunity again, I will revote to emphasize that I fail to share your patience: I vote Fircoal, in case / doesn't accept the other one
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Fircoal is telling the truth. I can't imagine he could guess this or would resist a hindsight action if he were inventing night results. It would be nice, sam levi, if you confirm or deny whether you also visited LSU. A watcher (stake-out?) sounds like it could be that 'superagent' type of role that LSU wouldn't change.Fircoal wrote:Night 1 - Pmchugh visited by Nzen
Night 2 - LSU visited by Nzen
Night 3 - LSU visited by sam_levi_11 and Nzen
Night 4 - Tal visited by no one
Fircoal is telling the truth. I can't imagine he could guess this or would resist a hindsight action if he were inventing night results. It would be nice, sam levi, if you confirm or deny whether you also visited LSU. A watcher (stake-out?) sounds like it could be that 'superagent' type of role that LSU wouldn't change.Fircoal wrote:Night 1 - Pmchugh visited by Nzen
Night 2 - LSU visited by Nzen
Night 3 - LSU visited by sam_levi_11 and Nzen
Night 4 - Tal visited by no one
Is chu supposed to represent Fircoal or somebody? LSU's vote suggests it does but when you vote via nickname, I can't tell.strokem1257 wrote:well to break that tie, vote Chu putting him at L-5
sorry, bad skimming. I haven't been paying attention to my mafia games as much as I should lately. too much going on in RL and such. but now that I reread the last few pages I see how fircoal appears to be innocent. I will remove my vote. I didn't have anything to base my vote on so I voted for the one person I kinda know left in the game. sorry for the misunderstanding.LSU Tiger Josh wrote:unvote vote strokem
obviously fircoal told the truth seeing how others confirmed it.
I am at L-6 so its probably not a good idea for me to claim this early. but if people are realyl feeling threatened by my bad skimming skills and such go ahead and vote me. but if I do get close to lynch I will claim.Thezzaruz wrote:I have no problems with a strokem lynch tbh but I have a hard time to throw my vote as I have no real evidence/suspicions against him either.
A claim perhaps?
You are also less than 40 hours away from being deadline lynched...strokem1257 wrote:I am at L-6 so its probably not a good idea for me to claim this early.
quite true and thats only because my accuser has left the building it seems. I could very well just random vote someone and then cause a tie. but that may accidentally bring down another townie with me. I will wait til less than 24 hours before I claim. (if it is still necessary)Thezzaruz wrote:You are also less than 40 hours away from being deadline lynched...strokem1257 wrote:I am at L-6 so its probably not a good idea for me to claim this early.
samecaptainwalrus wrote:I don't think I posted at all that day, I have been busy, and uninterested in this game.

what does a sudden death round consist of? No need to replace, ill get more active again/ wrote:So, what are asking for, replacement? Possibly a Sudden Death Round?
