Not taxing the rich

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
jonka
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:51 pm

Not taxing the rich

Post by jonka »

In AP Euro history, we are learning about the thirty years war, and on a side note, we were talking about how the French debt in 1648. Their solution was the sale of Church offices to the highest bidder (those who held church offices were tax exempt). And after the Bourgeoisie and the nobility bought these, there is no more wealth coming from these families (these offices passed from father to son), and classes. So in the long run, it was terrible(for France). It caused the French Revolution (through debt), and created all sorts of problems that most of you are probably familiar with.

I drew a connection to the modern day from this.
angola
Posts: 2076
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 1:56 pm
Location: Washington state

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by angola »

What was the connection that you drew?
User avatar
Apayah
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:46 am
Gender: Male

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by Apayah »

angola wrote:What was the connection that you drew?


^this
User avatar
Japs
Posts: 95
Joined: Mon May 07, 2007 4:00 pm
Location: Waterford, MI

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by Japs »

Well right now we do tax the rich, but I saw what you were thinking... I think :?
Image
User avatar
got tonkaed
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by got tonkaed »

its not that complicated folks.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by PLAYER57832 »

jonka wrote:In AP Euro history, we are learning about the thirty years war, and on a side note, we were talking about how the French debt in 1648. Their solution was the sale of Church offices to the highest bidder (those who held church offices were tax exempt). And after the Bourgeoisie and the nobility bought these, there is no more wealth coming from these families (these offices passed from father to son), and classes. So in the long run, it was terrible(for France). It caused the French Revolution (through debt), and created all sorts of problems that most of you are probably familiar with.

I drew a connection to the modern day from this.


There were some very major differences between then and now.
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by thegreekdog »

Interesting comparison. History tends to repeat itself.
Image
User avatar
pimpdave
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
Contact:

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by pimpdave »

Yeah, for real. Good food for thought post. When you see examples of the modern day mimicking what you've described, be sure to bump this thread.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
User avatar
Neoteny
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 11:24 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by Neoteny »

We could probably just keep this on page 1.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
xelabale
Posts: 452
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 9:12 am

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by xelabale »

Get gabonx and phatscotty in here, that should do it.
User avatar
pimpdave
Posts: 1083
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 10:15 am
Gender: Male
Location: Anti Tea Party Death Squad Task Force Headquarters
Contact:

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by pimpdave »

A bit tangential, but here's someone else predicting the future:

Yale professor predicts Iraq war outcome
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
HardAttack
Posts: 1935
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 1:15 pm

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by HardAttack »

thegreekdog wrote:Interesting comparison. History tends to repeat itself.


Fucking true.... This is something i more than strongly believe.... How did you come up to this point ?
Well done =D> =D> Seriously... % 95 of ppl has no idea of this.
LEGENDS of WAR
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 7:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by thegreekdog »

HardAttack wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Interesting comparison. History tends to repeat itself.


Fucking true.... This is something i more than strongly believe.... How did you come up to this point ?
Well done =D> =D> Seriously... % 95 of ppl has no idea of this.


:lol:

Your cookie is in the mail, you clever, clever fellow.
Image
User avatar
jonka
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:51 pm

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by jonka »

Japs wrote:Well right now we do tax the rich, but I saw what you were thinking... I think :?

Its good that we do, I'm trying to say that in France, you didn't see the trickle down of wealth, virtually at all. The Nobility just gained wealth and hoarded it, not having to pay taxes. You see, when you have massive amounts of land, and peasants are virtually stuck working for you because they don't have the means to start a successful enterprise, there is a trickle up. Usually this wealth was taxed, and the remainder used to raise armies, buy art, estates, etc. But now they have all this extra coming in, and they don't know what to do with it (they already have all they need, why try to amass more by investing). The Government isn't making money off of any of this, and it is hurting the economy (less demand for goods by the lower classes because they don't have the money to pay for it), further worsening the gov'ts problem. Luckily we have the power to change this taxation, but unluckily we don't have the benefit of the very rich, highly taxed bourgeoisie.
AlgyTaylor
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by AlgyTaylor »

jonka wrote:In AP Euro history, we are learning about the thirty years war, and on a side note, we were talking about how the French debt in 1648. Their solution was the sale of Church offices to the highest bidder (those who held church offices were tax exempt). And after the Bourgeoisie and the nobility bought these, there is no more wealth coming from these families (these offices passed from father to son), and classes. So in the long run, it was terrible(for France). It caused the French Revolution (through debt), and created all sorts of problems that most of you are probably familiar with.

I drew a connection to the modern day from this.

To be honest, I think the main thing you can draw from it is that, back in the middle ages, people were really naive. I mean, surely the name 'Thirty Years War' would've given them an idea of how long it'd last, it was obviously going to be a bloody expensive thing to keep up and, in the end, cause problems.

French people, eh? Always been pretty hopeless at the whole 'war' thing, bless 'em ... :mrgreen:

The Battle of Fishguard was a military invasion of Great Britain by Revolutionary France during the War of the First Coalition. The brief campaign, which took place between 22 February and 24 February 1797, was the most recent effort by a foreign force that was able to land on Britain, and thus is often referred to as the last invasion of Britain.

...

The heroine of the hour was Jemima Nicholas, who with her pitchfork, went out single-handedly into the fields around Fishguard and rounded up 12 French soldiers and 'persuaded' them to return with her to town where she locked them inside St Mary's Church.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 3:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by MeDeFe »

I don't think it was called the "Thirty Years' War" until afterwards.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
jonka
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:51 pm

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by jonka »

AlgyTaylor wrote:To be honest, I think the main thing you can draw from it is that, back in the middle ages, people were really naive. I mean, surely the name 'Thirty Years War' would've given them an idea of how long it'd last, it was obviously going to be a bloody expensive thing to keep up and, in the end, cause problems.

What the heck, I'll come out and ask it. Are you mentally retarded? Seriously, no joke.
AlgyTaylor
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by AlgyTaylor »

Yeah mate, totally
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by Woodruff »

AlgyTaylor wrote:To be honest, I think the main thing you can draw from it is that, back in the middle ages, people were really naive. I mean, surely the name 'Thirty Years War' would've given them an idea of how long it'd last, it was obviously going to be a bloody expensive thing to keep up and, in the end, cause problems.


I'm going to go ahead and believe that this is simply an attempt at humor and laugh (a little bit). I'm afraid to consider the alternative.

AlgyTaylor wrote:French people, eh? Always been pretty hopeless at the whole 'war' thing, bless 'em...


Yeah, that Napolean dude was clueless on the battlefield. Joan of Arc too.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
jonka
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:51 pm

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by jonka »

Woodruff wrote:
AlgyTaylor wrote:To be honest, I think the main thing you can draw from it is that, back in the middle ages, people were really naive. I mean, surely the name 'Thirty Years War' would've given them an idea of how long it'd last, it was obviously going to be a bloody expensive thing to keep up and, in the end, cause problems.


I'm going to go ahead and believe that this is simply an attempt at humor and laugh (a little bit). I'm afraid to consider the alternative.

AlgyTaylor wrote:French people, eh? Always been pretty hopeless at the whole 'war' thing, bless 'em...


Yeah, that Napolean dude was clueless on the battlefield. Joan of Arc too.

Side note: France has been beating up on Germany forever, Germany has only beaten up on them 3 times. We should really make fun of the Germans for being terrible at war.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by PLAYER57832 »

jonka wrote:
Japs wrote:Well right now we do tax the rich, but I saw what you were thinking... I think :?

Its good that we do, I'm trying to say that in France, you didn't see the trickle down of wealth, virtually at all. The Nobility just gained wealth and hoarded it, not having to pay taxes. You see, when you have massive amounts of land, and peasants are virtually stuck working for you because they don't have the means to start a successful enterprise, there is a trickle up. Usually this wealth was taxed, and the remainder used to raise armies, buy art, estates, etc. But now they have all this extra coming in, and they don't know what to do with it (they already have all they need, why try to amass more by investing). The Government isn't making money off of any of this, and it is hurting the economy (less demand for goods by the lower classes because they don't have the money to pay for it), further worsening the gov'ts problem. Luckily we have the power to change this taxation, but unluckily we don't have the benefit of the very rich, highly taxed bourgeoisie.

Actually this is the pattern not just in France. It was the pattern in India, Russia, China, ancient Greece and Rome, many ancient African nations, etc... etc.
AlgyTaylor
Posts: 433
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by AlgyTaylor »

Woodruff wrote:Yeah, that Napolean dude was clueless on the battlefield. Joan of Arc too.

How many times have the French conquered England in the last 900 years, eh? Never. And how many times has England/Britain conquered France? Twice in the last 90-odd years.

Point proven. The French are rubbish cheese-eating surrender monkeys and they know it.


(Pour le membres Francais - je plaisanterie, vouz pouvez insulte mon accent terrible et nourriture c'est encore plus mauvais :mrgreen: )
User avatar
Titanic
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Northampton, UK

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by Titanic »

AlgyTaylor wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Yeah, that Napolean dude was clueless on the battlefield. Joan of Arc too.

How many times have the French conquered England in the last 900 years, eh? Never. And how many times has England/Britain conquered France? Twice in the last 90-odd years.

Point proven. The French are rubbish cheese-eating surrender monkeys and they know it.


(Pour le membres Francais - je plaisanterie, vouz pouvez insulte mon accent terrible et nourriture c'est encore plus mauvais :mrgreen: )


We've conquered France twice in the past 90 years? Thats news to me....
User avatar
Army of GOD
Posts: 7190
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Not taxing the rich

Post by Army of GOD »

Titanic wrote:
AlgyTaylor wrote:
Woodruff wrote:Yeah, that Napolean dude was clueless on the battlefield. Joan of Arc too.

How many times have the French conquered England in the last 900 years, eh? Never. And how many times has England/Britain conquered France? Twice in the last 90-odd years.

Point proven. The French are rubbish cheese-eating surrender monkeys and they know it.


(Pour le membres Francais - je plaisanterie, vouz pouvez insulte mon accent terrible et nourriture c'est encore plus mauvais :mrgreen: )


We've conquered France twice in the past 90 years? Thats news to me....


I conquered France once.

But only because I held SA for a turn right before it.
mrswdk is a ho
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”