Moderator: Community Team
There was but they iced that remember?azezzo wrote:Perhaps there should be a section of c.c. for people who arent easily offended.
tell me about it. i was just called "jackass", "poopface" and "doo doo brown" by mibi within a thread and nothing was done about it. openly flaming and baiting a member within the GD and when i brought it to an admins attention i was told they were not flames. i was told everything i felt was an offense is not an offense. surely if i baited and flamed a member by calling them "jackass", "poopface" and "doo doo brown", i would receive a ban without any question. however, since mibi is a former member of the extended CC family, nothing happened to him. sure, they'll tell you that you don't know what happens and who gets warnings. but this was over the course of a few days within the same thread and was easily worth a 24 hour ban for flaming and baiting within the forums. double standards and a lack of consistency, that is what i have come to expect from the forums as of late...-0azezzo wrote:The current problem with the more conservative approach that has been taken is that there seems to be a lack of consistency with the enforcement of the rules, it seems that certain people can push the envelope time and time again and the mods will look the other way, as well as some current and past mods seem to get more lee way.

why would you blame the people in flame wars? it was contained to flame wars and rarely spilled over. flame wars was removed for whatever reason, and it is unfair to blame the people that frequented that forum. toss in the juvenile prank used to remove their forum without warning and i absolutely have no idea how you can blame anyone that was involved in flame wars. did i like flame wars? no. did i frequent flame wars? only on occasion to revisit some of the epic and hilarious threads that existed within the forum. do i miss flame wars? yes.PLAYER57832 wrote: They tried Flame Wars for a while, but it did not work. Apparently, the people posting there just caused too many problems. So, if you want to blame someone, blame them

PLAYER57832 wrote:I am of mixed feelings here. The real truth is that the standards for what is and is not offensive keep changing everywhere.
In our parent's and grandparent's day, folks living in a community pretty well knew what was and was not acceptable. Now, the rules have just changed and it is sometimes hard for anyone to know what they really are.
That said, this site is an internet site, open to all. They tried Flame Wars for a while, but it did not work. Apparently, the people posting there just caused too many problems. So, if you want to blame someone, blame them
As for uniformity... I think true uniformity is hard when the group (including mods) is so diverse. Maybe the idea of one mod being able to issue any penalties (instead of just the "heavier" stuff) needs to be reviewed a bit, but that would be hard to implement and I have the feeling it won't happen for that reason.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
targetman377 wrote:As from what i see. i see a couple things out of the mods and the cc'ers there seems to be 4 typs of posters here on this site group one 1 mods (they run the place and try to maintain the rules as of lack policy's) group 2. cc who just try to get by and move on and are not upset over flame wars and the banning of a few well liked trolls. group 3 the ones who are upset about the removal of flame wars, the banning of a few well liked trolls. (this group always yells at group 2 and says they flame and the group 1 dose not do anything about it cause they are just sucking up to the mods. these people love to get others banned cause they feel like since they were banned once and given punishment we all should feel it too. and group 4 the people who are new and do not know the old ways.
targetman377 wrote:As from what i see. i see a couple things out of the mods and the cc'ers there seems to be 4 typs of posters here on this site group one 1 mods (they run the place and try to maintain the rules as of lack policy's) group 2. cc who just try to get by and move on and are not upset over flame wars and the banning of a few well liked trolls. group 3 the ones who are upset about the removal of flame wars, the banning of a few well liked trolls. (this group always yells at group 2 and says they flame and the group 1 dose not do anything about it cause they are just sucking up to the mods. these people love to get others banned cause they feel like since they were banned once and given punishment we all should feel it too. and group 4 the people who are new and do not know the old ways.
Haha im sorry that just made me laugh.owenshooter wrote: tell me about it. i was just called "jackass", "poopface" and "doo doo brown" by mibi within a thread and nothing was done about it. openly flaming and baiting a member within the GD and when i brought it to an admins attention i was told they were not flames. i was told everything i felt was an offense is not an offense. surely if i baited and flamed a member by calling them "jackass", "poopface" and "doo doo brown",
ronc8649 wrote:targetman377 wrote:As from what i see. i see a couple things out of the mods and the cc'ers there seems to be 4 typs of posters here on this site group one 1 mods (they run the place and try to maintain the rules as of lack policy's) group 2. cc who just try to get by and move on and are not upset over flame wars and the banning of a few well liked trolls. group 3 the ones who are upset about the removal of flame wars, the banning of a few well liked trolls. (this group always yells at group 2 and says they flame and the group 1 dose not do anything about it cause they are just sucking up to the mods. these people love to get others banned cause they feel like since they were banned once and given punishment we all should feel it too. and group 4 the people who are new and do not know the old ways.
your posts are redundant, and not well thought out.
No flame wars was ok... didnt really work though. There was definitely some stuff that spilled over into other forums and plus there were continuous problems with some of the users there (anyone remember xHxIxTxLxExRx or whatever. That guys was an annoying thorn in the side of cc). If you ask me, getting rid of flame wars was a good thing for cc b/c it deterred some of the more hazardous and frankly unwanted cc'ers. Flame Wars was just a collection of the most obnoxious cc users with nothing better to do but insult each other in severely immature ways...some of them barely even played cc...and that is exactly the kind of crowd you dont want to attract as a website...especially if you're trying to keep things family friendly.ronc8649 wrote:and flame wars worked!!!!!!!!!!! nobody had a problem with it. they brought in some guy named hyasri to take the fall and tear it down with something called cutesy club.PLAYER57832 wrote:
That said, this site is an internet site, open to all. They tried Flame Wars for a while, but it did not work. Apparently, the people posting there just caused too many problems. So, if you want to blame someone, blame them
As for uniformity... I think true uniformity is hard when the group (including mods) is so diverse. Maybe the idea of one mod being able to issue any penalties (instead of just the "heavier" stuff) needs to be reviewed a bit, but that would be hard to implement and I have the feeling it won't happen for that reason.
Poop faceritz627 wrote:No flame wars was ok... didnt really work though. There was definitely some stuff that spilled over into other forums and plus there were continuous problems with some of the users there (anyone remember xHxIxTxLxExRx or whatever. That guys was an annoying thorn in the side of cc). If you ask me, getting rid of flame wars was a good thing for cc b/c it deterred some of the more hazardous and frankly unwanted cc'ers. Flame Wars was just a collection of the most obnoxious cc users with nothing better to do but insult each other in severely immature ways...some of them barely even played cc...and that is exactly the kind of crowd you dont want to attract as a website...especially if you're trying to keep things family friendly.ronc8649 wrote:and flame wars worked!!!!!!!!!!! nobody had a problem with it. they brought in some guy named hyasri to take the fall and tear it down with something called cutesy club.PLAYER57832 wrote:
That said, this site is an internet site, open to all. They tried Flame Wars for a while, but it did not work. Apparently, the people posting there just caused too many problems. So, if you want to blame someone, blame them
As for uniformity... I think true uniformity is hard when the group (including mods) is so diverse. Maybe the idea of one mod being able to issue any penalties (instead of just the "heavier" stuff) needs to be reviewed a bit, but that would be hard to implement and I have the feeling it won't happen for that reason.
He said it first. And he took my lunch money.ritz627 wrote:WHAT! YOU CALLED ME THAT?????!!!!!! HOW DARE YOUR!!!!! ANDY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
owenshooter wrote:tell me about it. i was just called "jackass", "poopface" and "doo doo brown" by mibi within a thread and nothing was done about it. openly flaming and baiting a member within the GD and when i brought it to an admins attention i was told they were not flames. i was told everything i felt was an offense is not an offense. surely if i baited and flamed a member by calling them "jackass", "poopface" and "doo doo brown", i would receive a ban without any question. however, since mibi is a former member of the extended CC family, nothing happened to him. sure, they'll tell you that you don't know what happens and who gets warnings. but this was over the course of a few days within the same thread and was easily worth a 24 hour ban for flaming and baiting within the forums. double standards and a lack of consistency, that is what i have come to expect from the forums as of late...-0azezzo wrote:The current problem with the more conservative approach that has been taken is that there seems to be a lack of consistency with the enforcement of the rules, it seems that certain people can push the envelope time and time again and the mods will look the other way, as well as some current and past mods seem to get more lee way.
p.s.-oh, and nice temporary lock on the thread where prime insulted members and never came back to explain his statement... i assume this is like the "temporary lock" on the tournament newsletter that contained the horribly bigoted interview with a 12 year kid that nobody bothered to edit other than another kid under the age of 15...
srry andy but i dont see how this is trolling,AndyDufresne wrote:Owen, lets keep your topic trolling out of other topics.
--Andy
Targetman, I will offer you a full English tutoring lesson for an easy payment of: $0.00!targetman377 wrote:![]()
![]()
you guys make me laugh. sorry again about my grammar i am really bad at English. it is my first language however i have never been a good writer all my life
my post is on topic and relevant... embarassing for CC? sure. another example of the double standard? without a doubt. just because you don't like what someone has posted, it is not trolling...-0AndyDufresne wrote:Owen, lets keep your topic trolling out of other topics.
--Andy

Yeah that isn't allowed actually.jefjef wrote:SIMPLE ANSWER FOR THOSE WHO MISS FLAME WARS.
Start a social group...........
ronc.............