MAFIA- ATHF THE SOLE MAFIA (HOUSSAM) WINS THE GAME!!!

cmckinney · Post by **cmckinney** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:28 pm

we still have basically nothing to go on.

any reason puff is getting hammered here? has he done anything suspiciuous? either way, chessplaya, u have been acting way to defensive in all of these mafia games. FOR GOD SAKE! U FOS'D ME FOR USING THE WORD BASEBALL BAT!!!!!! still, we have basicallly nothing

rudders · Post by **rudders** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:44 pm

Thanks cowboy! :lol:

geegel · Post by **geegel** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:48 pm

unvote cmckinney

Thanks for showing up again

geegel · Post by **geegel** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:50 pm

vote pyro55

Another absent player

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:41 pm

Vote Count

[6] puff -- (Mach, CBlake, Houssam, Pancakemix, dcowboy, Roger Dodger)
[1] everywhere116 -- (Fircoal)
[1] Slim_Jesta -- (hitman079)
[1] Machiavelli -- (*Slim_Jesta)
[1] pyro55 -- (geegel)
[1] fircoal -- (chessplaya)
[5] Not Voted -- (Everyone else)

9 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

Slim_Jesta wrote:Unvote: hitman079 Vote: Puff

*Slim, your last vote was for Machiavelli not hitman, so your vote for Mach still stands.

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:06 pm

dcowboys055 wrote:i think im going to unvote puff and vote chessplaya, what a retard. you certainly are on the defensive arent you?

We are voting puff because she seemed easier to get a majority - but honestly she didn't really do mch. Chessplaya on the other hand has been acting quite erratic. If you guys want to change and vote him, I can be talked into that for sure.

one more thing.. why is there an asterisk behind slimjesta in the vote count? Have I missed something??

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:07 pm

never mind about the asterisk - I had not scrolled down enough.

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:11 pm

On second thought... there is a slight remote infinitissimally small that chessplaya is not an idiot.. but rather an incredibly intelligent player! Maybe we should wait on him until we have more.. I don't want to say what I think I may have seen - because it may include revealing something, and frankly it's way too early to reveal anything at this stage.

pyro55 · Post by **pyro55** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:12 pm

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:13 pm

pyro55 wrote:puff

what about him?

pyro55 · Post by **pyro55** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:14 pm

vote puff

hows that

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:16 pm

pyro55 wrote:vote puff

hows that

clearly more definitive!! :roll:

dcowboys055 · Post by **dcowboys055** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:23 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote:
dcowboys055 wrote:i think im going to unvote puff and vote chessplaya, what a retard. you certainly are on the defensive arent you?

We are voting puff because she seemed easier to get a majority - but honestly she didn't really do mch. Chessplaya on the other hand has been acting quite erratic. If you guys want to change and vote him, I can be talked into that for sure.

one more thing.. why is there an asterisk behind slimjesta in the vote count? Have I missed something??

i was thinking along those lines as well. what do other people think?

puff hasnt jumped on the defensive which leads me to think he/she doesnt care if they are killed (not as much as if he/she was a mafia anyways).

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:25 pm

dcowboys055 wrote:
HoussamTheGreat wrote:
dcowboys055 wrote:i think im going to unvote puff and vote chessplaya, what a retard. you certainly are on the defensive arent you?

We are voting puff because she seemed easier to get a majority - but honestly she didn't really do mch. Chessplaya on the other hand has been acting quite erratic. If you guys want to change and vote him, I can be talked into that for sure.

one more thing.. why is there an asterisk behind slimjesta in the vote count? Have I missed something??

i was thinking along those lines as well. what do other people think?

puff hasnt jumped on the defensive which leads me to think he/she doesnt care if they are killed (not as much as if he/she was a mafia anyways).

hold it one more turn cowboy... I may have spotted something.. but I am reluctant to say what for now - because it potentially could expose 3 townies.. you with me here??

Slim_Jesta · Post by **Slim_Jesta** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 10:59 pm

Unvote: Machiavelli & Vote: puff

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:43 pm

Vote Count

[8] puff -- (Mach, CBlake, Houssam, Pancakemix, dcowboy, Roger Dodger, Slim_Jesta, Pyro55)
[1] everywhere116 -- (Fircoal)
[1] Slim_Jesta -- (hitman079)
[1] pyro55 -- (geegel)
[1] fircoal -- (chessplaya)
[4] Not Voted -- (Everyone else)

9 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:36 am

everywhere116 wrote:
Fircoal wrote:
everywhere116 wrote:
everyone in the thread wrote: random votes, random unvotes, repetative typos, threats of modkills....

This is hilariouus so far.

MOdkill: Everywhere116 in my game.

Unvote
Vote: Everywhere116

BEcause you posted.

What is your basis for your vote against me? Anything other than I made a funny comment about the thread? If you meant it as a joke, repeal it now. If you meant it, FOS Fircoal. If you repeal the vote I will gladly repeal the FOS.

Unvote: Everywhere116 Yes it was meant as a joke, there was no proof on you at the time.

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:39 am

Vote Count

[8] puff -- (Mach, CBlake, Houssam, Pancakemix, dcowboy, Roger Dodger, Slim_Jesta, Pyro55)
[1] Slim_Jesta -- (hitman079)
[1] pyro55 -- (geegel)
[1] fircoal -- (chessplaya)
[5] Not Voted -- (Everyone else)

9 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

geegel · Post by **geegel** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:32 am

At least puff was active, if pyro55 lives on we'll have no way of deciding if he's scum or not. I urge everybody to change their vote

pancakemix · Post by **pancakemix** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:40 am

Look, first off, pyro posted his vote on the last page. It has taken us two days to get eight votes for puff. He's one vote away from getting lynched. You want to try and convince us that we should change our minds even though some of us (like yours truly) will not change their vote and we'll end up with no lynch. That would not be good.

geegel · Post by **geegel** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:55 am

pancakemix wrote:Look, first off, pyro posted his vote on the last page. It has taken us two days to get eight votes for puff. He's one vote away from getting lynched. You want to try and convince us that we should change our minds even though some of us (like yours truly) will not change their vote and we'll end up with no lynch. That would not be good.

You have a point. Gah...

unvote pyro

vote puff

Roger Dodger · Post by **Roger Dodger** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 7:55 am

well MB looks like you have a lynching. now i can get some sleep

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

rudders · Post by **rudders** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 8:15 am

I lynch chessplaya

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 8:49 am

geegel wrote:
pancakemix wrote:Look, first off, pyro posted his vote on the last page. It has taken us two days to get eight votes for puff. He's one vote away from getting lynched. You want to try and convince us that we should change our minds even though some of us (like yours truly) will not change their vote and we'll end up with no lynch. That would not be good.

You have a point. Gah...

unvote pyro

vote puff

That was a really scummy thing to do.

geegel · Post by **geegel** » Wed Feb 14, 2007 8:51 am

I's still prefer to lynch an inactive (death to deadbeats), but it's better to lynch somebody than nobody at all