[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Account Sitting Abuse Again by Owenshooter and jbrettlip
Scott-Land wrote:
nagerous wrote:
jbrettlip wrote:i was banned for spurious reports? where is this in the guidelines? and the only posts i have reported have been of people openly flaming me within the forums (mibi, scott-land, khazalid, codeblue)... i did nothing wrong, and have not broken any forum guidelines by reporting these offending posts. the fact that King A responded to these reported posts is proof that they are not spurios. this is what i received from andy: "Ahoy Owenshooter, It seems recently you've engaged in numerous spurious reported posts, in addition to continued trolling, baiting, beatin' a dead horse, and requiring our volunteers to spend a disproportionate time responding to exclusively your needs. Because of all the above mentioned, Per the Minor Infractions, as outlined in the Community Guidelines, since you've previously received a 1 Month Forum Vacation, this next level is a 6 Month Forum Vacation. If things continue at a future date, you may unfortunately find yourself off gaming at Conquer Club. I know you've got good inside of you, too often you let your trolling take over and ruin it though" how are reported posts spurious if the offender is given a warning? this needs to be reviewed.-0
this is pretty messed, I saw flames from many people including mibi towards owen and he has every right to use the report post feature... I'll add more later but I'm only going to be on the computer 5 more minutes this evening.
This is Owen on Brett's account again ? Yet another violation ....
Seems each time Owen gets a ban-- he hops right onto jpbretts account and posts his rebuttal. And who knows what else during the course of a game.
Can we start a thread accusing Scott-Land of needing to "suck it up, cupcake"?
They don't cheat on their games, so stop crying.
Last edited by pimpdave on Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Communication is allowed. Posting for those that are banned is allowed. Just not excessively.
Why is frivolous complaints like this one allowed? Should be warned.
Come on CC... -0
Scott-Land wrote:I was one of the x that got a warning.... laughable really considering it was on topic but I guess we're supposed to be more sensitive to his feelings. Guess he rode the short bus to school after all.
And this FLAME and BAIT posted by this complainer also deserves to be warned/BAN.
Last edited by jefjef on Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Doesn't surprise me that the three of you think it's okay for Owen to circumvent his 6-month ban by logging into jp's account, plea his case and posting under another player's account.
hwhrhett wrote:i was under the impression that posting for people that are banned was not allowed....
# Posting Repeatedly for Vacationed or Banned Users
* If you choose to make posts for individuals who have received a vacation or a ban, don't be surprised if you find yourself quickly joining them in paradise.
Key phrase. Posting repeatedly.......
And S-LAND. Is there PROOF jbrett didn't post it.
Last edited by jefjef on Wed Oct 21, 2009 1:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
hwhrhett wrote:i was under the impression that posting for people that are banned was not allowed....
# Posting Repeatedly for Vacationed or Banned Users
* If you choose to make posts for individuals who have received a vacation or a ban, don't be surprised if you find yourself quickly joining them in paradise.
hwhrhett wrote:i was under the impression that posting for people that are banned was not allowed....
# Posting Repeatedly for Vacationed or Banned Users
* If you choose to make posts for individuals who have received a vacation or a ban, don't be surprised if you find yourself quickly joining them in paradise.
Key phrase. Posting repeatedly.......
i bolded the important part jef...
OK... Notice they word it "POSTS" and not "POST"?
Where's they proof S-Land?
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
I guess that's why they have the tools they have-- to find such proof. And once again, that's why it was sent to Nagerous to post. If it were jp, why not simply post it himself ?
Scott-Land wrote:I guess that's why they have the tools they have-- to find such proof. And once again, that's why it was sent to Nagerous to post. If it were jp, why not simply post it himself ?
Could be jbrett didn't want to post himself. Maybe he's on thin ice. Those whom CC admin do not like seem to be targeted and judged by different standards.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
That was from an email from my best friend of 20+ years.
And anyway, maybe I was interviewing him for a CC newsletter.
Finally, I would say what I think of you Scott-land, but since you're a mod pet and untouchable, I won't give you the satisfaction of my ban. But you are a jerk, and doo doo brown to me. (Those aren't flames, already been established.)
nothing wrong with a little bit of man on dog love.
hwhrhett wrote:i was under the impression that posting for people that are banned was not allowed....
# Posting Repeatedly for Vacationed or Banned Users
* If you choose to make posts for individuals who have received a vacation or a ban, don't be surprised if you find yourself quickly joining them in paradise.
Key phrase. Posting repeatedly.......
And S-LAND. Is there PROOF jbrett didn't post it.
I posted once for Anton without thinking and got a friendly warning. You're interpreting it too freely.
jbrettlip wrote:And anyway, maybe I was interviewing him for a CC newsletter.
Owens ban was well deserved. Him getting other people to post for him, or posting as other people. Takes the sting out of his ban, and makes it less of a punishment. He should be banned from commenting as other people. When your account sitting posting outside of saying your taking someones turn, is account sitting abuse.
BoganGod wrote:Owens ban was well deserved. Him getting other people to post for him, or posting as other people. Takes the sting out of his ban, and makes it less of a punishment. He should be banned from commenting as other people. When your account sitting posting outside of saying your taking someones turn, is account sitting abuse.
It was an email that brett posted for information about the ban. Not owen. Read the thread.
the.killing.44 wrote:
I posted once for Anton without thinking and got a friendly warning. You're interpreting it too freely.
im sure if owen were here he would be petitioning for consistency...
Consistency does not exist here.
.44. Interpreting too freely? It's exactly what it says. Perhaps it was applied against you outside the intent with which it was written. I have seen others post for other banned members and not a whisper about it. Seems that rules enforcement is based on popularity. If it isn't then it needs to be re-written.
But this is an intentional false accusation of account sitting abuse. Seems yet another vindictive abuse of the C & A forum. Another personal attack against a foe.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
I don't think brett should be punished for this. I think that owenshooter should because he is using his pw that is supposed to be used for account sitting only. Not for posting.
Highest Rank: Lieutenant | Highest Score: 1641
Mr. Squirrel wrote:
pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changed
colton24 wrote:I don't think brett should be punished for this. I think that owenshooter should because he is using his pw that is supposed to be used for account sitting only. Not for posting.
Read the thread before you post. He emailed me, I copied it and posted it. Owen did NOT post as me.
nothing wrong with a little bit of man on dog love.
colton24 wrote:I don't think brett should be punished for this. I think that owenshooter should because he is using his pw that is supposed to be used for account sitting only. Not for posting.
Read the thread before you post. He emailed me, I copied it and posted it. Owen did NOT post as me.
Well you should get slapped for helping him to get around his ban.
colton24 wrote:I don't think brett should be punished for this. I think that owenshooter should because he is using his pw that is supposed to be used for account sitting only. Not for posting.
Read the thread before you post. He emailed me, I copied it and posted it. Owen did NOT post as me.
Well you should get slapped for helping him to get around his ban.
This is CC official WRITTEN rule. AS a reminder. You will see that this rule was NOT violated.
Posting Repeatedly for Vacationed or Banned Users
* If you choose to make posts for individuals who have received a vacation or a ban, don't be surprised if you find yourself quickly joining them in paradise.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
