Moderator: Cartographers


Hallelujiahthenobodies80 wrote:Well done.![]()
Nobodies
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Well keep biting, it is going to be a while before I get a chance to get the final changes done.jammyjames wrote:aww man im biting my nails now....
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Once you've got updated images, then I'd say we're good to gogimil wrote:Well keep biting, it is going to be a while before I get a chance to get the final changes done.jammyjames wrote:aww man im biting my nails now....

Correct, I am in Ireland just now. Once I get home I will put the feudal file on my new laptop to make the correct credit changed then post them *hopfully* that being sunday night some time.Kotaro wrote: Maybe not medal worthy, but simply mentionable on the map?
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong

oh, no!! this must have happened when the ga'h-tri bridge was moved for gameplay reasons. i'm amazed that none of us spotted it in the months that we've been looking at it. does swapping tri 7 with tri 9 in both the map and xml solve it?MrBenn wrote:You're going to hate me for saying this, but the golden 8 on G'ah borders a golden 7 (Tri) and another golden 7 (G'ah).. Tri 7 borders Tri 8 and G'ah 8, while G'ah 9 borders G'ah 7 and Imperial 7...
Is there any chance of switching the numbering around so that you don't have two same-numbered territories as borders?
