Who has you on foe list.

azezzo · Post by **azezzo** » Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:53 pm

only the cowards

Supermarioluigi · Post by **Supermarioluigi** » Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:05 pm

Whoever I foed, has magically also foed me as well.

Robinette · Post by **Robinette** » Sun Nov 15, 2009 2:18 pm

Robinette wrote:My my... so much drama in this thread...

Now i have a question for all you experienced foe artists:
How do you know who has you on their foe lists?

Thanks to all who replied to this...
And now for a funny story about how i ended up on many a foe list.

Back in the Neolithic Age of Conquer Club,
i posted a thread sharing my dice hack program...
which evolved into a card hack program.
Well, there were some who couldn't follow the complex sequence,
and others who just thought it was so wrong...
so to avoid playing with such a brazen cheater, countless people foe'd me

danryan · Post by **danryan** » Sun Nov 15, 2009 2:24 pm

Way too many people for me to remember. No one worth playing again. I periodically do a cull on my foe list which is mainly reserved for suiciders. It seems 99% of the suicides I see are in speed games, and thus most of my foes from speed games as well.

Duality. · Post by **Duality.** » Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:34 pm

Aradhus wrote:Duality, you admitted you suicided, seriously, are you that stupid? You said you didn't think you could win so you threw the one stack bordering Aafitz into his stack. But that's ok, because you threw the other two stacks into the third player.. What amazing logic.

Want to try getting your facts right next time? AAFitz didn't have any stacks. His bonus wasn't defended: it was four regions of ones. Just double check the post next time okay? Righty-ho, bye!

Scott-Land · Post by **Scott-Land** » Sun Nov 15, 2009 6:20 pm

Mr Changsha wrote: Well you were blocked (are you still?) and we haven't seen scottland reach those +5,000 heights since. I remember thinking at the time that the evidence was suggestive.

What part of not wanting to invest the time and limiting my game selections to keep that high rank don't you get ? Not because I can't, because I choose not to. Something you will probably never have to worry about. See, I enjoy playing team games with my clan mates, and challenges, and an occasional tourny, so forth so on.

Have to admit, am a bit rusty in 6/8 man speed freestyle because I don't play it all that much anymore. Mistakes here and there has cost me... I've only won 8 or so of my last 10 ( 6 or 8 man speed freestyle games) and the 10 before that was pretty crappy. Something like 6 of 10 or 11. Winning 4 in a row then nose diving 0-4 but hey like I said I'm a little rusty.

The important thing to me is that I've managed to gain a little respect from the top ( not necessarily top ranking but those too) and most respected players on the site, the best of the best on the site. That Mister C is what's important at the end of the day not a high score I achieved and not whether you or your gang of Bandits thought I did so by cheating. So continue to scream it at the top of your lungs, and maybe you'll get someone to care or listen-- certainly not me nor those that know and respect me.

It's all so cute you bullets bannning together to fight Owen's fight-- so CUTE !

Mr Changsha · Post by **Mr Changsha** » Sun Nov 15, 2009 7:20 pm

Scott-Land wrote:
Mr Changsha wrote: Well you were blocked (are you still?) and we haven't seen scottland reach those +5,000 heights since. I remember thinking at the time that the evidence was suggestive.
What part of not wanting to invest the time and limiting my game selections to keep that high rank don't you get ? Not because I can't, because I choose not to. Something you will probably never have to worry about. See, I enjoy playing team games with my clan mates, and challenges, and an occasional tourny, so forth so on.

Have to admit, am a bit rusty in 6/8 man speed freestyle because I don't play it all that much anymore. Mistakes here and there has cost me... I've only won 8 or so of my last 10 ( 6 or 8 man speed freestyle games) and the 10 before that was pretty crappy. Something like 6 of 10 or 11. Winning 4 in a row then nose diving 0-4 but hey like I said I'm a little rusty.

The important thing to me is that I've managed to gain a little respect from the top ( not necessarily top ranking but those too) and most respected players on the site, the best of the best on the site. That Mister C is what's important at the end of the day not a high score I achieved and not whether you or your gang of Bandits thought I did so by cheating. So continue to scream it at the top of your lungs, and maybe you'll get someone to care or listen-- certainly not me nor those that know and respect me.

It's all so cute you bullets bannning together to fight Owen's fight-- so CUTE !

Yes, I can see it is still a bit raw. It is the stigma that does it, isnt it? 'Dodgy Conqueror'. Occasionally I see your name and I always think "Ah that's the chap who had that thing with Bruceswar and Twill blocked them..."

I can see why you wouldn't want the thread posted again in GD, but one must consider the historical record. Lot's of new chaps about now and we wouldn't want them to miss out on one of CC's greatest threads...

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... k#p1682754

(just in case anyone missed it the first time...

)

prismsaber · Post by **prismsaber** » Sun Nov 15, 2009 10:48 pm

Changsha sure is a vindictive asshole for some reason. Jealousy is what I think. Being a loud mouth on the forums does not equate to being a worthwhile cc'er, player, or person.

To keep on topic, chang is now on my foe list so I can avoid being annoyed reading any various threads.

Mr Changsha · Post by **Mr Changsha** » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:27 am

Enjoyed prismsaber's attempt to occupy the moral high ground, though i think he lost some of the potency of the position by attempting to jab his dagger in and dash like an overwhelmed midget in a hurry. At least stand and fight if you fancy another pop at me, prismsaber...none of this 'quick slap and sprint away' stuff. Most unbecoming of a 'natural leader' (as you love to tell us you are) I would think.

However, I must admit that he almost caught me in my best light when he wrote...

prismsaber wrote:Changsha sure is a vindictive asshole for some reason

Perfectly true, but prismsaber's a bit off with the explanation...

prismsaber wrote:Jealousy is what I think.

No, sheer enjoyment...my own, naturally. Of course you know you've really nailed your victim to the wall when they find themselves wailing...

prismsaber wrote:chang is now on my foe list so I can avoid being annoyed reading any various threads

Diddums.

Again, I find myself awarding you a C- in the 'Look How Large My Penis Is!' forum stakes. Give you credit for the holier than thou 'let us all stand in judgement' angle, but you really let yourself down with the 'but I'll let you all deal with him. I'm off faster than an Italian conscript who hasn't been paid for a month' terrible finish.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:29 am

Lets keep from baiting, yes? We aren't on a fishing trip here.

--Andy

demonfork · Post by **demonfork** » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:32 am

AndyDufresne wrote:Lets keep from baiting, yes? We aren't on a fishing trip here.

--Andy

True...I mean anytime someone can put more than 2 words together to form a coherent argument that means it's time to shut it down right?

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:33 am

Exactly. You hit the nail on the head demonfork. You've got me pinned! Pry up on me later and let me loose.

=========

I'm sure I'm on a couple of random Foe Lists, but I haven't encountered any for a while...

--Andy

demonfork · Post by **demonfork** » Mon Nov 16, 2009 11:55 am

AndyDufresne wrote:Exactly. You hit the nail on the head demonfork. You've got me pinned! Pry up on me later and let me loose.
=========

I'm sure I'm on a couple of random Foe Lists, but I haven't encountered any for a while...

--Andy

Yea, I wish we were allowed to foe mods.

AndyDufresne · Post by **AndyDufresne** » Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:04 pm

You can, just not through the actual Foe system. If you ask a Team CC member to refrain from playing in your games, they'll try to do so.

--Andy

Aradhus · Post by **Aradhus** » Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:27 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:You can, just not through the actual Foe system. If you ask a Team CC member to refrain from playing in your games, they'll try to do so.

--Andy

Or, you can't. You're at the mercy of the mod that pissed you off in the first place, probably, or possibly by being unreasonable. People tend to not change. Once unreasonable..

Not referencing any particular mod, I'm just sayin'.

I think you're often witty Mr Changsha, but you do seem to be hittin' the vindictive extra crispy on this one. As if there is something else that is gnawing at you, something that isn't public knowledge. Or maybe it is, just I don't know about it.

StephenB · Post by **StephenB** » Mon Nov 16, 2009 4:35 pm

nagerous wrote:Scott-land because I told people he got conqueror by cheating.

He cheated to get conquerer?

Incandenza · Post by **Incandenza** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:00 am

*sigh* No, nag was joking (I hope). Despite what some misguided souls may think, no, scott did not cheat to get to conqueror. He just kicked a lot of ass, which breeds resentment 'round these parts.

Bruceswar · Post by **Bruceswar** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 1:05 am

Incandenza wrote:*sigh* No, nag was joking (I hope). Despite what some misguided souls may think, no, scott did not cheat to get to conqueror. He just kicked a lot of ass, which breeds resentment 'round these parts.

I am not sure nag was joking... then again he is pissed scott foed him ages ago so...

jleonnn · Post by **jleonnn** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:04 am

King_Herpes he won.
jotheconqueror i won
darthvadar he won
Almeida17 he won
paws1610 another guy won

BigBallinStalin · Post by **BigBallinStalin** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 7:09 am

jleonnn wrote:King_Herpes he won.
jotheconqueror i won
darthvadar he won
Almeida17 he won
paws1610 another guy won

well, jeez, that's not very nice of you.

StephenB · Post by **StephenB** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:29 am

For those that didn't get it... I was joking. I read this thread and the one linked and I've made my own mind up as to whether or not I think he cheated.

Duality. · Post by **Duality.** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:10 am

New addition: KuGelFang, because I won.

Woodruff · Post by **Woodruff** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:42 am

Duality. wrote:New addition: KuGelFang, because I won.

I got the impression that KuGelFang foe'd you because of the discussion the two of you had in the forums. I'm pretty sure that's the case.

Duality. · Post by **Duality.** » Tue Nov 17, 2009 11:43 am

Woodruff wrote:
Duality. wrote:New addition: KuGelFang, because I won.
I got the impression that KuGelFang foe'd you because of the discussion the two of you had in the forums. I'm pretty sure that's the case.

I doubt it considering since that discussion I joined one of his games and beat him. After that I realised I was foed.

AAFitz · Post by **AAFitz** » Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:45 am

Duality. wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Duality. wrote:New addition: KuGelFang, because I won.
I got the impression that KuGelFang foe'd you because of the discussion the two of you had in the forums. I'm pretty sure that's the case.
I doubt it considering since that discussion I joined one of his games and beat him. After that I realised I was foed.

well, KuGelFang is actually very upfront about it. He foed me too... and apologized and had no problem stating it was because I was somewhat underanked...he doesnt make up phantom disputes or reasons to justify it the way...some have and you duality...are severely underanked... and with that name and that speed which came so quickly... there are just some that will never believe you are not a multi of some speeder that left, just trying to tank players....its just how it is

Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.

Re: Who has you on foe list.