[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
PM Abuse (severe I don't know, but it's un-necessary and un-called for)
Comments:
This was a reckless bout of PM abuse and spamming whilst I was serving a forum ban, and even before that. There were about 50 messages in total, some of which I deleted before my forum ban was issued, assuming he would stop eventually.
But the kid insisted on pointlessly sending me the messages later on with full knowledge that I couldn't read them. Each message read like this:
There were exactly 16 messages; not anywhere near 50.
You also posted 3-4 times on my wall flaming me, which of course you deleted. I couldn't post on your wall, so I took it to PM's. admins can see deleted wall posts, right?
That answers your question, as well as saying it was necessary and called for.
the.killing.44 wrote:There were exactly 16 messages; not anywhere near 50.
You also posted 3-4 times on my wall flaming me, which of course you deleted. I couldn't post on your wall, so I took it to PM's. admins can see deleted wall posts, right?
That answers your question, as well as saying it was necessary and called for.
Spamming me with blank messages is your way of "Taking it to PM", or solving a situation like this?
You either need to learn to flame, or develop some problem solving skills.
But hey, I'm dealing with young teens here, aren't I? D'oh!
the.killing.44 wrote:There were exactly 16 messages; not anywhere near 50.
You also posted 3-4 times on my wall flaming me, which of course you deleted. I couldn't post on your wall, so I took it to PM's. admins can see deleted wall posts, right?
That answers your question, as well as saying it was necessary and called for.
I don't have a dog in this fight, but I don't see any possible way to justify that as "necessary". It seems silly to even suggest it.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Not to steal your thunder LoVo, but this grave crime is something than spans beyond the borders of CC. Such reckless and dangerous behaviour is not tolerable, and is an afront to the global village we live in. I've taken this one to the UN Council on Human Rights, and will get back to you as soon as the emissary replies to my email...
hahaha3hahaha wrote:
the verdict is... The .44 is innocent
obliterationX wrote:Over the past number of months, I've probably aroused more hate on this site than you can shake a stick at. Although entertaining to read some of my PMs, I've decided to call an end to the use of my foe list, and apologise to those who were a victim of what some would call my "abuse". It's a very powerful tool on a website such as this, the concept of blocking players entirely from joining your games is a concept that is easily open to exploitation. That given, yes. At times, it's somewhat rewarding. However, rest assured, having such restrictions certainly arouses annoyance and frustration for me, let alone you guys on the recieving end! It's not very often that a 3-man Classic Shapes speed game doesn't get a single join in over 2 hours. For as much regaining the fun for me, I'd like to give everyone on CC the chance to willingly join any of games, as you may know hasn't been the case for a long time, even those who were "legitimately" placed there for a good reason.
So, I offer my extended apologies for my actions concerning use of this feature, and I hope everyone has a nice day.
Not always being privy to all this fun drama between players on this site leaves me (and I assume others) kinda in the dark when bits of these little power struggles spill over into C&A. I still don't think it's appropriate to use C&A as a "Nuclear Option" when your tussling with someone online.
Maybe if it was required to post all the dirty details of these little feuds (there have been a lot posted in C&A this last two weeks) it would be more obvious how trivial these things are and how both sides are obviously guilty of these minor indiscretions. I say quit the tattletale crap, ignore/foe the guy if you want to stop the problem, and focus on the game.
e_i_pi wrote:Not to steal your thunder LoVo, but this grave crime is something than spans beyond the borders of CC. Such reckless and dangerous behaviour is not tolerable, and is an afront to the global village we live in. I've taken this one to the UN Council on Human Rights, and will get back to you as soon as the emissary replies to my email...
The thunder has been stolen. *ZAP!*
Lightning goes "ZAP", not thunder.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
the.killing.44 wrote:There were exactly 16 messages; not anywhere near 50.
You also posted 3-4 times on my wall flaming me, which of course you deleted. I couldn't post on your wall, so I took it to PM's. admins can see deleted wall posts, right?
That answers your question, as well as saying it was necessary and called for.
Im just thorowing something out here but i think 16 of thoes pms is still spam
ronc8649 wrote:set your inbox to not receive pms from him.
or simply erase them.
really? this is absurd. i sure hope cc clears thekilling.24
Why would he be cleared? You don't believe that's an abuse of the system? You don't believe it's being intentionally annoying?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Spamming someone's inbox is annoying at the best of times. Even more annoying whilst someone is on a forum ban. It is just baiting a response and is a nuisance. Killing has been given the next level of punishment.
lord voldemort wrote:Spamming someone's inbox is annoying at the best of times. Even more annoying whilst someone is on a forum ban. It is just baiting a response and is a nuisance. Killing has been given the next level of punishment.
lord voldemort wrote:Spamming someone's inbox is annoying at the best of times. Even more annoying whilst someone is on a forum ban. It is just baiting a response and is a nuisance. Killing has been given the next level of punishment.
