MAFIA- ATHF THE SOLE MAFIA (HOUSSAM) WINS THE GAME!!!

chessplaya · Post by **chessplaya** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:15 pm

fircoal u r the scum among us and u r going down after ur friend everywhere 116

machiavelli i back u 100% on ur post that houssam is scum as well
although he convinced me with his strategy but if u look carefully through his posts u would find out that he is not clean from any of the kills

everywhere116 · Post by **everywhere116** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:15 pm

First off, I have no idea where you guys are getting that I am scum.CBlake, if you are a cop, I have four ways that I could have turned up guilty.

chessplaya · Post by **chessplaya** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:18 pm

oh well here comes everywhere116 with a logical respond to change our minds!!!!crap this game is full of spam i will vote no lynch untill i die i will not believe any of u guyz
trust no1 but myself

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:18 pm

Machiavelli wrote:
IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE SK TO WIN!!!

Deep breath sweetie. Once again, there is no reason why the serial killer necessarily have to be the last one standing - the mod can make up any rule he wants! For all I care, the win condition for the serial killer could be to make a kill every night but never to kill mafia! It is A LOT more logical to suspect a SK or Vig to explain away 2 kills in one night (especially since it is OBVIOUS by now we have only one mafia) than to rule out the possibility of a SK based on the win condition.

Having said that, let's see where we are: the only confirmed townies (in my opinion anyways) are you, Fircoal, and myself. And if we accept you to be a townie, then CBlake must be the cop - right?

chessplaya · Post by **chessplaya** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:19 pm

unvote:everywhere116
VOTE:NO LYNCH
till the moment u scum kill me

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:19 pm

everywhere116 wrote:First off, I have no idea where you guys are getting that I am scum.CBlake, if you are a cop, I have four ways that I could have turned up guilty.

1. I am a miller and I don't know it (this is possible; look on mafiascum.com.)
2. You are insane/paranoid.
3. I was framed.
4. You are a mafia cop and are lying.

5. Mafia (not cop) and is lying
6. incredibly stupid townie and is lying.
7. Traitor and lying.

If he was a traitor he could do this to get rid of a townie then get rid of himself, resulting in 4 down for the mafia to pull out an easier win.

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:20 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote:
Machiavelli wrote:
IT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE SK TO WIN!!!

Deep breath sweetie. Once again, there is no reason why the serial killer necessarily have to be the last one standing - the mod can make up any rule he wants! For all I care, the win condition for the serial killer could be to make a kill every night but never to kill mafia! It is A LOT more logical to suspect a SK or Vig to explain away 2 kills in one night (especially since it is OBVIOUS by now we have only one mafia) than to rule out the possibility of a SK based on the win condition.

Having said that, let's see where we are: the only confirmed townies (in my opinion anyways) are you, Fircoal, and myself. And if we accept you to be a townie, then CBlake must be the cop - right?

Argeed accept I'm not sure about CBlake being our cop, I doubt it more then I believe it.

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:21 pm

CHessplaya trying to frame people so you don't die.

EOS: Chessplaya, Everywhere116, CBlake

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:21 pm

Fircoal wrote:7. Traitor and lying.

If he was a traitor he could do this to get rid of a townie then get rid of himself, resulting in 4 down for the mafia to pull out an easier win.

what's the win condition for a traitor typically?

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:25 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote:
Fircoal wrote:7. Traitor and lying.

If he was a traitor he could do this to get rid of a townie then get rid of himself, resulting in 4 down for the mafia to pull out an easier win.

what's the win condition for a traitor typically?

For the mafia to win.

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:28 pm

Fircoal wrote:
For the mafia to win.

then at this pace all he needed to do was to keep quiet.. he had no need to make a false claim.

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:31 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote:
Fircoal wrote:
For the mafia to win.

then at this pace all he needed to do was to keep quiet.. he had no need to make a false claim.

But say we hit scum, he'd need to get the attention off of the scum.

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:33 pm

Fircoal wrote:
HoussamTheGreat wrote:
Fircoal wrote:
But say we hit scum, he'd need to get the attention off of the scum.

Even at the expense of his own life. makes sense..

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:36 pm

Vote Count

[3] everywhere116 -- (CBlake, Mach, Geegel)
[1] senfive -- (fircoal)
[1] No Lynch -- (chessplaya)
[7] Not Voted -- (Everyone else)

7 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:40 pm

Mach.. if you are right in the other game, then I can't be 100% sure of fircoal in this game. do you know what I am saying?

Let me be very clear - I don't think he acted suspicious at all - I am sayiing I was operating under an assupmtion, which if you turn out to be right over there, would be a wrong assumption. you with me?

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:41 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote:Mach.. if you are right in the other game, then I can't be 100% sure of fircoal in this game. do you know what I am saying?

Let me be very clear - I don't think he acted suspicious at all - I am sayiing I was operating under an assupmtion, which if you turn out to be right over there, would be a wrong assumption. you with me?

I see your point Houssam, but I'm 90% sure we're both townies.

HoussamTheGreat · Post by **HoussamTheGreat** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:43 pm

Fircoal wrote:
I see your point Houssam, but I'm 90% sure we're both townies.

me too.

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:44 pm

Vote Count

[2] everywhere116 -- (CBlake, Mach)
[1] senfive -- (fircoal)
[1] *houssam -- (geegel)
[1] No Lynch -- (chessplaya)
[7] Not Voted -- (Everyone else)

7 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

Geegel, you voted 3 times in this day, and not once did you unvote. You must unvote in order to change it. So as of right now, your vote is for Houssam.

Machiavelli · Post by **Machiavelli** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:47 pm

HoussamTheGreat wrote:Mach.. if you are right in the other game, then I can't be 100% sure of fircoal in this game. do you know what I am saying?

Let me be very clear - I don't think he acted suspicious at all - I am sayiing I was operating under an assupmtion, which if you turn out to be right over there, would be a wrong assumption. you with me?

I dont understand, and I just realized that I might be blending games together.

Why am I so sure that fircoal is town?

Senfive · Post by **Senfive** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:50 pm

Master Bush wrote:Vote Count

[2] everywhere116 -- (CBlake, Mach)
[1] senfive -- (fircoal)
[1] *houssam -- (geegel)
[1] No Lynch -- (chessplaya)
[7] Not Voted -- (Everyone else)

7 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

Geegel, you voted 3 times in this day, and not once did you unvote. You must unvote in order to change it. So as of right now, your vote is for Houssam.

fircoal you really voted for me. Ha. I can't take back what I did. I am truely sorry. Like I said earlier He didn't help himself at all by lurking and changing his vote without any explination then he came out only when he had a ton of votes on his head. that was a dumb noob townie acting scum like for no reason. I am sorry if I happen to pick up on who is noob in this game.

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:57 pm

Senfive wrote:
Master Bush wrote:Vote Count

[2] everywhere116 -- (CBlake, Mach)
[1] senfive -- (fircoal)
[1] *houssam -- (geegel)
[1] No Lynch -- (chessplaya)
[7] Not Voted -- (Everyone else)

7 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

Geegel, you voted 3 times in this day, and not once did you unvote. You must unvote in order to change it. So as of right now, your vote is for Houssam.

fircoal you really voted for me. Ha. I can't take back what I did. I am truely sorry. Like I said earlier He didn't help himself at all by lurking and changing his vote without any explination then he came out only when he had a ton of votes on his head. that was a dumb noob townie acting scum like for no reason. I am sorry if I happen to pick up on who is noob in this game.

Ty senfive you not knowly picked up a mod error. I'm not voting Senfive. I didn't even FOS him.

geegel · Post by **geegel** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:29 pm

I apologize for not unvoting. Anyway here goes the corrected version.

unvote

vote everywhere116

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:42 pm

Vote Count

[3] everywhere116 -- (CBlake, Mach, Geegel)
[1] CBlake -- (fircoal)
[1] No Lynch -- (chessplaya)
[7] Not Voted -- (Everyone else)

7 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

Sorry Fircoal, I got confused, because some people were voting and then not unvoting before changing their vote, including you.

Fircoal · Post by **Fircoal** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:46 pm

Master Bush wrote:Vote Count

[3] everywhere116 -- (CBlake, Mach, Geegel)
[1] CBlake -- (fircoal)
[1] No Lynch -- (chessplaya)
[7] Not Voted -- (Everyone else)

7 Total Votes are needed for a Lynch or No Lynch

Sorry Fircoal, I got confused, because some people were voting and then not unvoting before changing their vote, including you.

It's ok, we all make mistakes, I've corrected other mods on the vote count. :twisted:

And anyway, if you want to see me when I made a bigger mistake look at my mafia game.

Master Bush · Post by **Master Bush** » Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:48 pm

No need to let me off the hook there. I was trying to throw half the blame your way.