Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team


It is one person. Each account takes turns at the same time. I think a simple ban of both accounts would be the fair decision.jleonnn wrote:agreed... They could be tricking us into thinking that they are 2 people... or it could be true. I don't see any sign of them being the same person though. Yet, like mentioned above, let's see what the mods say.
i dont agree with that.. its very possible they wait for each other to take turns to discuss.. there is certain games i do that with my partners.. anyway, u could be right.. i just think if they were multis they would be trying to gain points in a different way then playing doubles on the same team.. they just arnt abusing the system and doing what all mods ask all players playing in the same household to do.. play as a team so there is no abuse or any natural way to give the one u know the edge..Queen_Herpes wrote:It is one person. Each account takes turns at the same time. I think a simple ban of both accounts would be the fair decision.jleonnn wrote:agreed... They could be tricking us into thinking that they are 2 people... or it could be true. I don't see any sign of them being the same person though. Yet, like mentioned above, let's see what the mods say.

Ultimately if they didn't report via eticket that they were playing from the same household, per the rule, they are to be banned. I'm just quoting the rule.VampireM wrote:i dont agree with that.. its very possible they wait for each other to take turns to discuss.. there is certain games i do that with my partners.. anyway, u could be right.. i just think if they were multis they would be trying to gain points in a different way then playing doubles on the same team.. they just arnt abusing the system and doing what all mods ask all players playing in the same household to do.. play as a team so there is no abuse or any natural way to give the one u know the edge..Queen_Herpes wrote:It is one person. Each account takes turns at the same time. I think a simple ban of both accounts would be the fair decision.jleonnn wrote:agreed... They could be tricking us into thinking that they are 2 people... or it could be true. I don't see any sign of them being the same person though. Yet, like mentioned above, let's see what the mods say.
again mods will put down the hammer soon enough
Maybe im missing something but looking at the rule section there is no print about having to report an eticket if you are playing form the same household? i have played plenty on this site.. and i have never seen this rule, its more of a suggestion to avoid any debate of being a multi.. if u could show me where this is written i would like to see it.. thank youQueen_Herpes wrote:Ultimately if they didn't report via eticket that they were playing from the same household, per the rule, they are to be banned. I'm just quoting the rule.VampireM wrote:i dont agree with that.. its very possible they wait for each other to take turns to discuss.. there is certain games i do that with my partners.. anyway, u could be right.. i just think if they were multis they would be trying to gain points in a different way then playing doubles on the same team.. they just arnt abusing the system and doing what all mods ask all players playing in the same household to do.. play as a team so there is no abuse or any natural way to give the one u know the edge..Queen_Herpes wrote:It is one person. Each account takes turns at the same time. I think a simple ban of both accounts would be the fair decision.jleonnn wrote:agreed... They could be tricking us into thinking that they are 2 people... or it could be true. I don't see any sign of them being the same person though. Yet, like mentioned above, let's see what the mods say.
again mods will put down the hammer soon enough

Actually, you are making up a rule.Queen_Herpes wrote:Ultimately if they didn't report via eticket that they were playing from the same household, per the rule, they are to be banned. I'm just quoting the rule.VampireM wrote:i dont agree with that.. its very possible they wait for each other to take turns to discuss.. there is certain games i do that with my partners.. anyway, u could be right.. i just think if they were multis they would be trying to gain points in a different way then playing doubles on the same team.. they just arnt abusing the system and doing what all mods ask all players playing in the same household to do.. play as a team so there is no abuse or any natural way to give the one u know the edge..Queen_Herpes wrote:It is one person. Each account takes turns at the same time. I think a simple ban of both accounts would be the fair decision.jleonnn wrote:agreed... They could be tricking us into thinking that they are 2 people... or it could be true. I don't see any sign of them being the same person though. Yet, like mentioned above, let's see what the mods say.
again mods will put down the hammer soon enough
I'm just glad that the absence of this rule has been clarified. I'll cite this thread in future discussions. I have seen the "rule" that I quoted used to bring down the ban hammer, but since these two are coming in from the same IP...and have been cleared without getting a warning nor ban...a precedent has now been set.AAFitz wrote:Actually, you are making up a rule.Queen_Herpes wrote:Ultimately if they didn't report via eticket that they were playing from the same household, per the rule, they are to be banned. I'm just quoting the rule.VampireM wrote:i dont agree with that.. its very possible they wait for each other to take turns to discuss.. there is certain games i do that with my partners.. anyway, u could be right.. i just think if they were multis they would be trying to gain points in a different way then playing doubles on the same team.. they just arnt abusing the system and doing what all mods ask all players playing in the same household to do.. play as a team so there is no abuse or any natural way to give the one u know the edge..Queen_Herpes wrote:It is one person. Each account takes turns at the same time. I think a simple ban of both accounts would be the fair decision.jleonnn wrote:agreed... They could be tricking us into thinking that they are 2 people... or it could be true. I don't see any sign of them being the same person though. Yet, like mentioned above, let's see what the mods say.
again mods will put down the hammer soon enough
May I ask what precedent has been set?Queen_Herpes wrote: I'm just glad that the absence of this rule has been clarified. I'll cite this thread in future discussions. I have seen the "rule" that I quoted used to bring down the ban hammer, but since these two are coming in from the same IP...and have been cleared without getting a warning nor ban...a precedent has now been set.

When two or more accounts are coming from the same IP, the assumption will be that they are not multis but instead that they are two or more distinct users. They will be cleared, they will not be banned.Evil Semp wrote:May I ask what precedent has been set?Queen_Herpes wrote: I'm just glad that the absence of this rule has been clarified. I'll cite this thread in future discussions. I have seen the "rule" that I quoted used to bring down the ban hammer, but since these two are coming in from the same IP...and have been cleared without getting a warning nor ban...a precedent has now been set.
thats not true at all... there is more then just ip check to determine multis..Queen_Herpes wrote:When two or more accounts are coming from the same IP, the assumption will be that they are not multis but instead that they are two or more distinct users. They will be cleared, they will not be banned.Evil Semp wrote:May I ask what precedent has been set?Queen_Herpes wrote: I'm just glad that the absence of this rule has been clarified. I'll cite this thread in future discussions. I have seen the "rule" that I quoted used to bring down the ban hammer, but since these two are coming in from the same IP...and have been cleared without getting a warning nor ban...a precedent has now been set.

A. There has never existed such a rule that states you must declare yourself via an E-Ticket if your playing from the same household.Queen_Herpes wrote: I'm just glad that the absence of this rule has been clarified. I'll cite this thread in future discussions. I have seen the "rule" that I quoted used to bring down the ban hammer, but since these two are coming in from the same IP...and have been cleared without getting a warning nor ban...a precedent has now been set.

Queen_Herpes wrote:When two or more accounts are coming from the same IP, the assumption will be that they are not multis but instead that they are two or more distinct users. They will be cleared, they will not be banned.Evil Semp wrote:May I ask what precedent has been set?Queen_Herpes wrote: I'm just glad that the absence of this rule has been clarified. I'll cite this thread in future discussions. I have seen the "rule" that I quoted used to bring down the ban hammer, but since these two are coming in from the same IP...and have been cleared without getting a warning nor ban...a precedent has now been set.
