[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Very suspicious play by one of these players in the game listed below. Not sure that they are multis but they are certainly playing like either they are multis or are definitely conducting secret diplomace.
Game number(s):
6034034
Comments:Please look into this matter. Suspicious enough to warrant a look.
Very suspicious play by one of these players in the game listed below. Not sure that they are multis but they are certainly playing like either they are multis or are definitely conducting secret diplomace.
I doubt multi's because they are both premium. 50 bucks is a lot to pay for 1 multi. As for secret alliance, possible due to there being no good reason for red to attack you (no spoils, no fog). Feudal doesn't have the easiest strategy, so i would guess that he was trying to go 2 castle vs 2 castle to try and match bonuses. Could just be bad strategy.
Caymen was Rebel territory. Stuck in the middle between you and blue. He attacked for survival/possible win. If his attack was entirely successful he would be in a good spot. I'm gonna guess the dice failed him. Not much else he could do. You were the closest.
I doubt cheat and as for multi very very doubtful. They don't even chat the same.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
I appreciate the commentary...didnt' make sense to me to take us both out of the game but at the same time I guess you have to attack at some point...I'm not discontent with anything but thought it warranted a second look...Thanks for the replies.