1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.
lord voldemort wrote:1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.
You mean to say that everyone who gets down low is point dumping? I think not.
Highest Rank: Lieutenant | Highest Score: 1641
Mr. Squirrel wrote:
pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changed
Jan 2nd someone with low points could win a battle royal and get really nice nice points. 109 players at 100 each is 10,900 in score from one game.
OHHHHH. I thought he was talking about point of view. Yes, you can get banned, depending on whether you express a point of view that is racists or bigoted. Never played battle royal, so don't know the score there.
lord voldemort wrote:1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.
You mean to say that everyone who gets down low is point dumping? I think not.
lord voldemort wrote:1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.
You mean to say that everyone who gets down low is point dumping? I think not.
well i think so
Right so when I was a 210 cook I was automatically point dumping.
Highest Rank: Lieutenant | Highest Score: 1641
Mr. Squirrel wrote:
pmchugh wrote:BUMP- one more fool needed
One fool reporting for duty!
Been around for too long...said things that shouldn't have been said...but all that has changed
lord voldemort wrote:1 point people are banned....
to get to one point you have to be throwing games....you can of coarse appeal such cases...But 99% of the time they are doing it on purpose.
You mean to say that everyone who gets down low is point dumping? I think not.
well i think so
Right so when I was a 210 cook I was automatically point dumping.
What are you trying to prove, here? The discussion is about nearing 1 point. Having 265 (which is actually your low, not 210) is not close to 1.
c-rod91339 wrote:isnt low balling \where your pants sag or thats what i heard
No. It's when a good player takes some low-ranks and just tells them what to do in a game against multiple high-ranks. For maximum point gain. Like this asshole.
c-rod91339 wrote:isnt low balling \where your pants sag or thats what i heard
No. It's when a good player takes some low-ranks and just tells them what to do in a game against multiple high-ranks. For maximum point gain. Like this asshole.
nooo low balling is actively trying to get to 1 point...
@ colton....210 points is a far cry from 1 point