Good enough...at what?Pedronicus wrote:My crazy idea is that all Americans who voted for the guy who didn't get in, stop fucking posting and just accept that the party they wanted to win wasn't fucking good enough to win.
Moderator: Community Team
Good enough...at what?Pedronicus wrote:My crazy idea is that all Americans who voted for the guy who didn't get in, stop fucking posting and just accept that the party they wanted to win wasn't fucking good enough to win.
I do accept that.Pedronicus wrote:My crazy idea is that all Americans who voted for the guy who didn't get in, stop fucking posting and just accept that the party they wanted to win wasn't fucking good enough to win.
Nothing? I'm disappointed.Woodruff wrote:I must admit though that I am quite curious to hear which of my views you would consider to be elitist. Care to share?rockfist wrote:Woodruff, you give the appearance of being elitist with some of your posts.Woodruff wrote: I definitely don't care for this one. Elitism sucks.
It's the avatar. Everything you say is appended with "your puny logic is no match for my Vulcan mind"...Woodruff wrote:Nothing? I'm disappointed.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
I'm actually for that. The college served its purpose and is no longer necessary. Indirect democracy doesn't work and probably cannot work in any system where political parties form. (When the Constitution was written the two major parties, Whig and Democratic Republicans had not yet formed.) Since these electors serve no other purpose (as opposed to a parlimentary system where the members of parliment vote for the PM) they are not necessary and are generally choosen by the winner anyway without the direct selection of the people.The Neon Peon wrote:Get rid of the electoral college, get the vote directly from the people.
I'm going to say that I'm against "term limits." I would rather be in favor of consecutive term limits. So you can run for office twice (let's say) let someone else take over and then you can try to run again. This limits encumbent powers and allows good people who served in their younger years to serve again in their older years. Otherwise one tends to get the political shuffle; they are always serving, just in different positions.Phatscotty wrote:TERM LIMITS!

Interesting view. Did you say the same thing during the previous administration? OK, you could say it doesn't apply because of the Florida thing. How about the Reagan/Bush Sr. admin? Those who disagree should have remained silent and "accept that the party they wanted to win wasn't f***ing good enough to win" right?Pedronicus wrote:My crazy idea is that all Americans who voted for the guy who didn't get in, stop fucking posting and just accept that the party they wanted to win wasn't fucking good enough to win.
Either this is extremely ironic, or pmchugh is pretty damn drunk.pmchugh wrote:My crazy view is to get rid of thot it jus tfuks up the human race
I'm thinking the lattermuy_thaiguy wrote:Either this is extremely ironic, or pmchugh is pretty damn drunk.pmchugh wrote:My crazy view is to get rid of thot it jus tfuks up the human race
Definately the latter.mgconstruction wrote:I'm thinking the lattermuy_thaiguy wrote:Either this is extremely ironic, or pmchugh is pretty damn drunk.pmchugh wrote:My crazy view is to get rid of thot it jus tfuks up the human race