Circus Maximus Royal Rumble I [WINNER: Captain_Morgan13]

[yonstineru]

In please

[bruno fountain]

in please

[Huntyr Green]

I'll give it a try!

[-Dredz-]

in please

[TalynStarburst]

in plz

[kuma32478]

Updated

[skillfusniper33]

Ill play.

[longboreder]

i'll play

[kuma32478]

3 to go

[shocked439]

In please

[milo67]

in, please

[benga]

in

[skillfusniper33]

Game 1 has completed, Puzzleman and I survive.

[kuma32478]

I'll have the next game invite sent out when I get home from work.

[skillfusniper33]

Next game please.

[kuma32478]

I have changed the setting to 4 man game instead of three.

[skillfusniper33]

I have changed the setting to 4 man game instead of three.

That kinda changes some things around now, is it still the top 2, or is it the top 3 that move on?

[kuma32478]

3

[slickstick]

that makes it even more difficult for the new player coming in, as it is now 3 against one, as the initial starting players will have an alliance to go to the end and then fight it out, so it makes it actually pointless to play, in the real royal rumble it was always better to come in last because you are fresher, not the case here though.

[puzzleman]

one guy didnt accept

[kuma32478]

Thank you. I will execute him via a dull butter knife to the throat and move to the next name on the list.

[Huntyr Green]

that makes it even more difficult for the new player coming in, as it is now 3 against one, as the initial starting players will have an alliance to go to the end and then fight it out, so it makes it actually pointless to play, in the real royal rumble it was always better to come in last because you are fresher, not the case here though.

I happen to be that player, and I'm struggling to understand how this doesn't qualify as secret diplomacy.

Game Chat from the first game ([game]6477677[/game]) cannot legally be applied to later games. Any pre-existing alliances clearly break Rule #2. If there is some exception, will someone please let me know before I report this as cheating?

[skillfusniper33]

that makes it even more difficult for the new player coming in, as it is now 3 against one, as the initial starting players will have an alliance to go to the end and then fight it out, so it makes it actually pointless to play, in the real royal rumble it was always better to come in last because you are fresher, not the case here though.

I happen to be that player, and I'm struggling to understand how this doesn't qualify as secret diplomacy.

Game Chat from the first game ([game]6477677[/game]) cannot legally be applied to later games. Any pre-existing alliances clearly break Rule #2. If there is some exception, will someone please let me know before I report this as cheating?

First of all, there have been no PM's between any of us, or contact in any way, The rules changed since we went to 4 player games. This tournament was basically set up to end like this. It is not my fault that everyone attacked you in round 1, I looked through the game log and noticed you were the weakest, and decided that I wanted to move on. I am sorry that this happened

[kuma32478]

Probably the best way to handle this is to simply scrap the tournament. It's better than causing issues.

[skillfusniper33]

Probably the best way to handle this is to simply scrap the tournament. It's better than causing issues.

I don't know, but i thought of an idea to keep it running, and make it more fair. This will also involve a lot more work on your part, and the tournament would run for a longer amount of time. You could re-draw each game. for example, in our first game, me and puzzle would move on, so you would put us back in the pot and re-draw, keeping it fair, and no alliances would be made since it would be very unlikely to make it in multiple games with the same person.

The person who was eliminated first would then be out.

How did you do the draw for the random order? A website or by hand?