reparations for slavery

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
SultanOfSurreal
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:53 am
Gender: Male

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by SultanOfSurreal »

ARGUMENT FOR SLAVE REPARATIONS

by Dr. Lathardus Goggins II

Over the past few years, I have read and/or heard many discussions regarding African American Reparations. I have also noticed that those who try to articulate opposition to reparation have either shown their ignorance of the issue or how bigotry clouds good judgment. Though the debate about how reparations are to be paid continues, I fail to understand how any clear thinking knowledgeable person can deny the “rightness” of reparations. Reparations are neither about discrimination nor about the individuals who committed dehumanizing acts. African American Reparations is based on a legal precedence, that when a society or group willingly and knowingly commits a crime or “moral wrongs” against another compensation is due from the institutions that represent the offending society or group. There are countless examples of this principle.

The rightness of African American Reparations is based on that from 1619 – 1865, the legal status of people of African descent was property (i.e., Massachusetts Body of Liberties-1641; Belt v. Dalby-1786; Fugitive Slave Act-1850; Dred Scott Decision-1857), a status legitimized by all levels of government. Again, African American Reparations is not about simple dissemination that, yes, all immigrants face. It is about the countless laws passed at all levels of government (local, state, federal) that in effect institutionalized the dehumanization and disfranchisement of black people. No law was passed against the Irish from practicing their own culture. No law was passed to prevent the Irish from learning to read and write English. For 246 years, this was the case for people of African descent in the United States, laws that often carried the death penalty. During a brief period 1865 – 1876, blacks received full protection as citizens under the law. However, in short order, the federal government again institutionalized and thus sanctioned the dehumanizing and disfranchisement of African Americans (i.e. R. B. Hayes deal-1878; jim crow laws; Plessy vs. Ferguson-1896).

One horrific evidence of the federal government complacency towards and collaboration in dehumanizing and the disfranchisement of African Americans, is that while an estimated 3,386 people were lynched from 1882 to 1930, the vast majority of which were African America men (On average that is the equivalent of 1 person every 5 days for 48 years), an anti-lynching act could not be passed in congress. Do not confuse lynching to be an isolated act of violence. Lynchings were generally social events. For example, in Ohio on June 18, 1897 a black man was lynched in front of a crowd of estimated 9,000 people. Lynchings were not social responses to an individual, but individual examples to the entire black community regarding the power of whites over blacks. Furthermore, there are no records of any person associated with a lynching of being convicted from 1880 – 1905, which implicates local, state and federal governments as sanctioning lynching.

Without Sanctuary: Photographs and Postcards of Lynching in America

Lynching is but one example of social dehumanization and disfranchisement of African Americans by the American Society. One could have easily discussed the educational, psychological, economical, cultural disfranchisement or countless other examples of the brutal and willing disregard for human potential in African Americans. Recently, another example is congress refusal to vote on a resolution to apologize for the United States role in enslaving people of African descent (where 50-60% of the approximately 20,000,000 people taken from Africa, died just in crossing, Middle Passage).

Given the legal precedence set by the reparation paid to Jews and aid given to Israel; the reparations given to Japanese Americans; and the Marshall plan, when one looks at the facts (I suggest The Debt by Randall Robinson, Reparations by Arnold Schuchter and The Case for Black Reparations by Boris Bittker) the rightness of African American reparations cannot be questioned.

For those who suggest that providing African American Reparation will not be easy, I say true. However, “difficulty” ought not ever be the criterion for determining if something is right or not. There is much debate still needed to determine how much, in what form and how will reparations be distributed. Nevertheless, there cannot be any question of should reparations be paid to African Americans. Any clear thinking informed person must answer, YES!

A post note:

In 1893, Bishop Henry McNeal Turner organized a national convention to discuss the conditions of African-Americans and strategies for remedy. During the convention Bishop Turner, calculated that the African-American community was owed $49,000,000,000.00 (billion). Using an inflation calculator, the current value ranges from 1.1 to 45.9 trillion dollors (see the numbers).
User avatar
SultanOfSurreal
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:53 am
Gender: Male

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by SultanOfSurreal »

john9blue wrote:I'll take your laughter as concession.


ok you go ahead and do that, champ

Reparations is taking money from one person by force and giving it to another. That's stealing. I hesitate to say it's "wrong" because it may ultimately benefit society, but it helps to put it in perspective like that and see it for what it is- robbery.

I've got a question now, who exactly is keeping black people from achieving their full potential?


it is truly amazing to see how many topics you can just go off about while knowing precisely fucking nothing about them. it's like you're a robot who runs on ill-informed opinions.
User avatar
john9blue
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 7:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by john9blue »

You didn't answer my question. I'll give you a second chance!

Suppose we go another 100 years without reparations. You would claim the government is still responsible for its previous mistakes. But if blacks are still disadvantaged, how do we know that it's because of discrimination occurring centuries ago? In fact, a case could be made that the slave trade helped bring blacks to America to bring about their future success relative to blacks still living in Africa. Perhaps they owe us for helping them out eh? So who are you to say what is right and wrong, and how much I need to pay to blacks for crimes my ancestors committed? What kind of ass-backwards thinking is that?

If you don't answer either of the questions then I'll assume the height of your knowledge on this matter to be the copy-pasting of essays written by others.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
SultanOfSurreal
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:53 am
Gender: Male

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by SultanOfSurreal »

john9blue wrote:You didn't answer my question. I'll give you a second chance!

Suppose we go another 100 years without reparations. You would claim the government is still responsible for its previous mistakes.


mmmhmmm yeah

But if blacks are still disadvantaged, how do we know that it's because of discrimination occurring centuries ago?


because there would be no other plausible explanation short of alien overlords invading earth sometime in the 2050s and enforcing a race-based caste system on humanity

In fact, a case could be made that the slave trade helped bring blacks to America to bring about their future success relative to blacks still living in Africa.


a) no it couldn't
b) the only reason africa is the continent-sized hellscape that it is today is the involvement of european colonialists there over the past five centuries that, amongst myriad other things, instituted and upheld the slave trade. you are justifying crimes against humanity with the very effects of those crimes.
c) f*ck you you stupid fucking ape, and f*ck the repugnant ideas you are always, always spewing.
d) i hope you choke to death on your own fucking tongue
e) srsly

Perhaps they owe us for helping them out eh?


you have no idea how much joy i would take in seeing you violently beaten

So who are you to say what is right and wrong, and how much I need to pay to blacks for crimes my ancestors committed? What kind of ass-backwards thinking is that?


well i'm not a deranged closet bigot who can't stand the idea of others succeeding, so objectively speaking i'm more qualified to have an opinion on this issue than you

If you don't answer either of the questions then I'll assume the height of your knowledge on this matter to be the copy-pasting of essays written by others.


ohhhh noooooo
User avatar
john9blue
Posts: 1268
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 7:18 pm
Gender: Male
Location: FlutterChi-town

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by john9blue »

Yeah I thought you'd react to that kind of harshly lol. Doubtless you imagine me to be some kind of fat cocky nerd who is clueless about the real world. Look, I know where you're coming from. There's little doubt in my mind that your ideals are in the right place. Hear that? I support equal opportunity for all races. But the way you want them achieved, and the lack of respect you have for anyone that disagrees with you, is annoying at best and laughably stupid at worst.

You really think poor black families will want a $100,000 check from the government saying "here, sorry for the tragedies you weren't alive for, you're one of us now" while their impoverished white neighbors continue to barely scrape by? You really think that a temporary band-aid like that will make blacks and whites live together in harmony?

Why not use that money to invest in inner-city schools or something?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)
User avatar
SultanOfSurreal
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 4:53 am
Gender: Male

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by SultanOfSurreal »

john9blue wrote:Yeah I thought you'd react to that kind of harshly lol. Doubtless you imagine me to be some kind of fat cocky nerd who is clueless about the real world.


ding ding ding

Look, I know where you're coming from. There's little doubt in my mind that your ideals are in the right place. Hear that? I support equal opportunity for all races. But the way you want them achieved, and the lack of respect you have for anyone that disagrees with you, is annoying at best and laughably stupid at worst.


you just told us that black people should be thankful for slavery. what the f*ck did you expect.

You really think poor black families will want a $100,000 check from the government saying "here, sorry for the tragedies you weren't alive for, you're one of us now" while their impoverished white neighbors continue to barely scrape by? You really think that a temporary band-aid like that will make blacks and whites live together in harmony?


i said it's not a panacea. however, it will go a long way. as for lower-class white people -- like all poor people, their social mobility is pretty low too, and we should try to fix that, but it has nothing at all to do with the issue at hand

Why not use that money to invest in inner-city schools or something?


uh why not allow black people to choose for themselves where to invest the money that is rightfully theirs? or do you think they're too stupid to do these things on their own.
Frito Bandito
Posts: 659
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Orygone

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by Frito Bandito »

I thought I had posted this already, but, guess I didn't, anyway.

While it will never happen, there is justice to suggesting we give reparations to the slaves/descendants.

But I mainly want to refute the notion the ex-slaves were given a whole lot after the civil war. In much of the south they were systematically oppressed by the reinstalled ex-confederate government who had a willing ally in the despicable Andrew Johnson. Their lot was often reduced to becoming sharecroppers -basically serfs. Their right to vote was denied to them via terror and obstruction in Mississippi at the very least.

Read a interesting book touching on this subject, "The State of Jones", it's about a part of the south that rebelled against the confederacy.

Again, reparations won't happen.
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by BigBallinStalin »

Frito Bandito wrote:I thought I had posted this already, but, guess I didn't, anyway.

While it will never happen, there is justice to suggesting we give reparations to the slaves/descendants.

But I mainly want to refute the notion the ex-slaves were given a whole lot after the civil war. In much of the south they were systematically oppressed by the reinstalled ex-confederate government who had a willing ally in the despicable Andrew Johnson. Their lot was often reduced to becoming sharecroppers -basically serfs. Their right to vote was denied to them via terror and obstruction in Mississippi at the very least.

Read a interesting book touching on this subject, "The State of Jones", it's about a part of the south that rebelled against the confederacy.

Again, reparations won't happen.


Not any time soon at all, I agree on that, but let's keep the conversation going.

How would the government be able to determine who exactly deserves reparations? I'm assuming that they would require citizens to prove that they have an ancestor who was slave, and then some government body would verify that.

However, how much does each family/person receive and how is that number determined? What if some people have less ancestors who were slaves than those whose who had more ancestors who were slaves?

And does having a slave ancestor alone qualify one to receive reparations? What if one's ancestors were slaves and then after their limited amount of freedom became fairly successful in life. Do people with those ancestors deserve less reparations than those whose ancestors were slaves and who weren't as lucky/affluent as other recently freed slaves?

[just throwing random stuff out there, pick and choose at will, fora-goers]
AAFitz
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 10:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by AAFitz »

SultanOfSurreal wrote:we owe reparations to the descendants of all people who were enslaved, although i would say not for indentured servitude, which while a horrible institution, did not have the same sort of long-lasting effects that slavery did. the descendants of white slaves have also had their reparations in the form of the aforementioned systemic bias that exists in favor of all white people.


The question is, who is we? Do I owe money to people enslaved in a country because my ancestors moved here after slavery was abolished, because of my race? Do African American's whose families that were never enslaved owe money to other African Americans who were never enslaved? No native Americans owe money to African Americans that were enslaved on land that was stolen from them?

Do we owe a debt to people this country has wronged? Absolutely. Can it just be paid in cash? Of course not.

By the logic of this thread, everyone who has ever had an injustice against them is owed money. Im sure my ancestors were paid less than Non-Irish workers when they came to this country because of discriminatory pay practices at the time. Can I get a check? I admit, its petty compared to slavery, but if my ancestors were all getting 40% less pay just because of their origins, than the estimated value of that money with interest is rather large.

Do we owe families that had women workers working for less because of discriminatory pay practices?

Again, a petty complaint when compared to slavery. However, slaves were paid. They were paid in food. This food was paid only to keep them alive of course, but most were given food, however vile and unappetizing as it may have been.

Do we subtract this amount out of the calculations? What was the fair wage for labor at the time, compared with the cost of food they received, and shelter, that some received? No doubt its a lot, but some slaves were most certainly given more than others. Its not fair for the better-treated slave decendants to receive the same amount as the poorly treated ones.

Now, those calculations of course do not account for the cost of being enslaved, which was their abduction, and essential incarceration, and often wrongful death. Those are the crimes that ironically one can put an actual number too, because its an arbitrary number anyways. Unfortunately, some families were enslaved for generations, where as some for perhaps as short as one generation, theoretically. Surely the families of those enslaved for generation after generation deserve much more than those who were enslaved for one generation, and again, those who were not enslaved, would be as responsible as most, for paying that.

For an African American that did not have family abducted or enslaved, is as responsible as any person of any race that arrived to this country post-slavery.

We all have benefited from the contributions of slaves that generated rapid growth in the US. We all have benefited from all of the injustices from the contributions of other races that arrived and were paid, marginal sums to work and build the foundation for the US. Some, no doubt, have benefited more. Many still benefit from injustice, again, some more than others.

A society cannot, however, just put a dollar figure one every injustice in its history, and fix it. It can mostly only work towards correcting current injustices, and more importantly, in correcting such an injustice, there would be further injustice, which would arguably need to be resolved at a later date.

Its simply impossible.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by PLAYER57832 »

SultanOfSurreal wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:Moral and ethical for those who are responsible. The problem today is that far too many people who's ancestors are not responsible would be asked to pay.


the us government would pay.

The government pays = our taxes =we pay. Ironically enough, this would mean that blacks would be paying for their own reparations.

Furthermore, if you want reparations, why just the US government. Many governments were explicitly and implicitly involved.


SultanOfSurreal wrote:this is not to mention that the slave trade and other european activities in africa over the course of the past five centuries are the sole reason why africans living in america are "better off" than the africans in africa. WE fucked africa up. and now you want to use the tragedy of billions to justify the tragedy of millions, when the blood from both is pretty squarely on our collective hands. that is fucking disgusting.

First, there is a difference between justifying actions and saying, after a time, that any correction would cause more harm than good. We cannot go back and undo the past. Furthermore, I certainly don't see slave trade as the sole reason African Americans are better off now than in the past. I simply say it is a far more complicated situation than some would like to make it out to be. Many blacks who seek these repartions, for example, have absolutely no idea that AFrican Nations were implicit in this as well. They sold off their defeated enemies. Slavery was a long-established way of dealing with enemies. The whites "merely" stepped in to take advantage of an existing system. Again, this is no excuse, but to judge the people of that day by our standards today is silly at best, and at worst fails to recognize how that system evolved and persisted, thus leading us to repeat it.

In an ideal world, slavery would never have existed, no one would have taken advantage of Africa, etc. We are not in an ideal world.

Further, when you criticize slavery, it has to be seen as a step in a continuum of progress. Slavery is perhaps better than death. The US was the "last" holdout of a depraved system within the civilized world.


SultanOfSurreal wrote:
If anyone is owed reparations, I would say it is not the blacks, it is native americans.


we pay native americans tons of money already. we owe them a lot of land which rightfully belongs to them, too, but that's an issue for another day.


This is simply false, but there are other threads on the matter.
Last edited by PLAYER57832 on Thu Mar 11, 2010 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by PLAYER57832 »

jonesthecurl wrote:The last time that any of my family were involved in slavery was probably when some of my anglo-saxon ancestors enslaved some of my celtic ancestors in the 6th century.

In my history, it actually goes back further... but then, neighbors did do a bit down there in England and Scottland.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by PLAYER57832 »

john9blue wrote:Yeah I thought you'd react to that kind of harshly lol. Doubtless you imagine me to be some kind of fat cocky nerd who is clueless about the real world. Look, I know where you're coming from. There's little doubt in my mind that your ideals are in the right place. Hear that? I support equal opportunity for all races. But the way you want them achieved, and the lack of respect you have for anyone that disagrees with you, is annoying at best and laughably stupid at worst.

You really think poor black families will want a $100,000 check from the government saying "here, sorry for the tragedies you weren't alive for, you're one of us now" while their impoverished white neighbors continue to barely scrape by? You really think that a temporary band-aid like that will make blacks and whites live together in harmony?

Why not use that money to invest in inner-city schools or something?

In truth, this is a far more just and equitable solution.

Particularly since it would impact everyone. Though I know I am going to be laughed at for saying this, one reason we did away with slavery is that it harmed us all. Granted, I am in no way saying that the harm done to whites is the same as having your children sold away from you, having to watch your wife be raped by the white master, being beaten and starved to death... etc., etc. However, to claim that simply throwing money is going to really solve anything, do more than make a few recipiants temporarily feel better, is simply silly.

I mean, I really don't think Oprah Winfrey or Emannuel Lewis or even Tiger Woods really are in need of reparations.

Also, as jonusthecurl quipped, just being white does not mean you in any way supported slavery.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by Woodruff »

SultanOfSurreal wrote:let's kick this pig.

i'll start off by saying that reparations are obviously the moral and ethical thing to do, and there is ample precedence for it in american law. a tort has been committed and the party who committed it (namely the american government) owes a debt. the wronged parties are dead, so that debt is owed to their next of kin -- the descendants of american slaves.

the amount of reparations owed and how to pay them and who exactly to pay them to are all serious issues that will need to be worked out, but no hurdles to the practical implementation of reparations can change the basic fact that they are owed and should be paid.


This is far below your normal standards for trolling, both in content and subject matter. I'm very disappointed.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Imaweasel
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:43 pm
Location: Raccoon City
Contact:

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by Imaweasel »

anyone that thinks reparations are needed...feel free to write the local black family a check round christmas time....otherwise I dont feel the need to pay for something that I wasnt a part of....NOT A SINGLE BLACK PERSON IN THE USA TO WAS EVER A SLAVE. they dont deserve reparations anymore than we deserve to have to pay them.
GabonX wrote:The fact of the matter is that reality does not conform to your sense of political correctness.
User avatar
tzor
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Long Island, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by tzor »

SultanOfSurreal wrote:let's kick this pig.

i'll start off by saying that reparations are obviously the moral and ethical thing to do, and there is ample precedence for it in american law. a tort has been committed and the party who committed it (namely the american government) owes a debt. the wronged parties are dead, so that debt is owed to their next of kin -- the descendants of american slaves.


Sure, you can kick the pig; you’re just kicking the wrong pig!

Let’s start of with a few facts here.

The “American Government” did not commit the tort. American slave owners committed the tort. While the descendents of slaves might have a right to receive the payment from those who committed the tort, the descendents of those slave owners are not liable for the payment of the tort.

Even assuming that the descendents are liable, the American Government, now consisting of a whole lot of people who are not descendents of slave owners is not liable. Why should, (for example) Barrack H. Obama (who is not a descendent of slaves) be responsible for paying reparations for a thing neither he nor his ancestors had any action in?
Image
User avatar
natty dread
Posts: 12877
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: just plain fucked

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by natty dread »

I realize this is none of my business as I don't live in The America...

But if you say the government should pay the african-americans... then what about african-americans who are in the government? Will they pay to themselves?
Image
User avatar
tzor
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Long Island, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by tzor »

When they say "the government" they really mean one of two groups.

Increased Taxes: The people, that, ironically, includes African Americans and descendents of slaves.

Use of Treasury Bonds: People yet to be born, ironically that also includes African Americans and descendents of slaves.

(Let's ignore the "print more money" argument: Everyone looses with that one.)

You see, "the government" doesn't actually have any money.
Image
User avatar
Timminz
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: At the store

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by Timminz »

How's this? Families with "old" money (especially from the south), foot the bill to ensure that every school in the country is as good, or better than, the one they would send their own children to. They will also ensure that every descendant of slaves has the exact same level of health insurance as their family does. I could go on (specifically to deal with land, and money), but those two things, in my opinion, would make the most significant difference in today's society.

Those are the ones who are still benefiting directly off the work of their ancestors' slaves. They are the ones who should be required to provide the descendants of the slaves with the same basic privileges that they are themselves are provided.
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by BigBallinStalin »

Timminz wrote:How's this? Families with "old" money (especially from the south), foot the bill to ensure that every school in the country is as good, or better than, the one they would send their own children to. They will also ensure that every descendant of slaves has the exact same level of health insurance as their family does. I could go on (specifically to deal with land, and money), but those two things, in my opinion, would make the most significant difference in today's society.

Those are the ones who are still benefiting directly off the work of their ancestors' slaves. They are the ones who should be required to provide the descendants of the slaves with the same basic privileges that they are themselves are provided.



Drastic wealth redistribution? Not gonna be allowed to happen since the wealthy do exercise a good bit of influence.

Your justifications sound fair, but that would also implicate a lot of today's major and multinational corporations who started off in the South (or had benefited from sax labor); they simply aren't going to let this wealth distribution happen to them. The burden of the cost would get thrown onto the government who then uses taxpayer's money.
User avatar
Timminz
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: At the store

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by Timminz »

BigBallinStalin wrote:
Timminz wrote:How's this? Families with "old" money (especially from the south), foot the bill to ensure that every school in the country is as good, or better than, the one they would send their own children to. They will also ensure that every descendant of slaves has the exact same level of health insurance as their family does. I could go on (specifically to deal with land, and money), but those two things, in my opinion, would make the most significant difference in today's society.

Those are the ones who are still benefiting directly off the work of their ancestors' slaves. They are the ones who should be required to provide the descendants of the slaves with the same basic privileges that they are themselves are provided.



Drastic wealth redistribution? Not gonna be allowed to happen since the wealthy do exercise a good bit of influence.

Your justifications sound fair, but that would also implicate a lot of today's major and multinational corporations who started off in the South (or had benefited from sax labor); they simply aren't going to let this wealth distribution happen to them. The burden of the cost would get thrown onto the government who then uses taxpayer's money.


Exactly why it will never happen. Too often, what's right falls to the side of what's going to actually happen.
silent wind
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:24 pm

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by silent wind »

Timminz wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
Timminz wrote:How's this? Families with "old" money (especially from the south), foot the bill to ensure that every school in the country is as good, or better than, the one they would send their own children to. They will also ensure that every descendant of slaves has the exact same level of health insurance as their family does. I could go on (specifically to deal with land, and money), but those two things, in my opinion, would make the most significant difference in today's society.

Those are the ones who are still benefiting directly off the work of their ancestors' slaves. They are the ones who should be required to provide the descendants of the slaves with the same basic privileges that they are themselves are provided.



Drastic wealth redistribution? Not gonna be allowed to happen since the wealthy do exercise a good bit of influence.

Your justifications sound fair, but that would also implicate a lot of today's major and multinational corporations who started off in the South (or had benefited from sax labor); they simply aren't going to let this wealth distribution happen to them. The burden of the cost would get thrown onto the government who then uses taxpayer's money.


Exactly why it will never happen. Too often, what's right falls to the side of what's going to actually happen.


f*ck that. what is right is you work your fucking ass off and earn a fucking living. If you work really fucking hard, you become fucking wealthy. f*ck "wealth re-distribution." Guess what... A lot of the "wealthy" mother fuckers in this country started with fucking pennies in their pocket. In fucking America, all you are guaranteed is a fucking opportunity. Go to fucking france if you want someone fucking else's fucking money... f*ck
User avatar
Timminz
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: At the store

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by Timminz »

You're a fucking moron.
User avatar
BigBallinStalin
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
Contact:

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by BigBallinStalin »

Timminz wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
Timminz wrote:How's this? Families with "old" money (especially from the south), foot the bill to ensure that every school in the country is as good, or better than, the one they would send their own children to. They will also ensure that every descendant of slaves has the exact same level of health insurance as their family does. I could go on (specifically to deal with land, and money), but those two things, in my opinion, would make the most significant difference in today's society.

Those are the ones who are still benefiting directly off the work of their ancestors' slaves. They are the ones who should be required to provide the descendants of the slaves with the same basic privileges that they are themselves are provided.



Drastic wealth redistribution? Not gonna be allowed to happen since the wealthy do exercise a good bit of influence.

Your justifications sound fair, but that would also implicate a lot of today's major and multinational corporations who started off in the South (or had benefited from sax labor); they simply aren't going to let this wealth distribution happen to them. The burden of the cost would get thrown onto the government who then uses taxpayer's money.


Exactly why it will never happen. Too often, what's right falls to the side of what's going to actually happen.


But we can dream, can't we?

EDIT: Wait a minute, what the hell is "sax labor?"
User avatar
Timminz
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: At the store

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by Timminz »

BigBallinStalin wrote:what the hell is "sax labor?"


A poorly spelled version of the British political party that Bill Clinton attempted to start in 2007?
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: reparations for slavery

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Imaweasel wrote: NOT A SINGLE BLACK PERSON IN THE USA TO WAS EVER A SLAVE.

Just want to point out that this is incorrect. True, no one alive today was enslaved on a plantation prior to the civil war.

However,while slavery is no longer legal, it still exists. From the sex slave trade to battered women, etc, slavery does exist, even here in the US.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”