reverend_kyle wrote:what was your screen name in the myspace debate group?
It doesn't matter, but I left when he started having that invite free for all. The only people I remember are you, FNNP, Wendy, Chris, Jarred, Art, and Sonja.
reverend_kyle wrote:You weren't even there for the serious/social group schism..
I remember quite a few people trevor>you, noah, travis, fnnp, wendy, chris. and art are the ones who come to mind.
Schism? What happened?
Uhh.. serious people got pissed about the amount of joking going on and the lack of debate, so Chris turned the original one into a social group and invited the serious people to go to a new one not focused on being a social group.. then christopher went crazy and deleted both.
reverend_kyle wrote:Some people go to far in order to make people look stupid over the interwebs.. I just sort of nod my head and go.. ok..sure..ok..whatever.
This goes beyond making him look stupid (he already does a good job, I don't think it's possible to make his act any better), this has legal ramifications as well.
I will not consent to any results he may have gained from me if he truly is involved in some sort of study.
What legal ramifications?? I am not using anybody's names, or user names. I'm just naming the website, my opinions, and a few of the more interesting quotes. Not to mention I have to get the TOP grade for any of this to get published, and if it does get published, it will be in a pshychology book based on human emotions, and reactions. It won't be a best seller to say the least. The only other place any of this MIGHT come up, is the anger management class I teach down at the community center.
Like I said, no names will be mentioned, not even usernames.
Highest score to date: 2704 (June 25, 2008)
Highest on Scoreboard: 86 (June 25, 2008)
Highest Rank : Colonel (May 27, 2008)
Lowest Score to date : 776 (Nov 20, 2012)
Lowest Rank to date: Cook (Nov 20, 2012)
Shortest game won: 15 seconds - Game 12127866
reverend_kyle wrote:Some people go to far in order to make people look stupid over the interwebs.. I just sort of nod my head and go.. ok..sure..ok..whatever.
This goes beyond making him look stupid (he already does a good job, I don't think it's possible to make his act any better), this has legal ramifications as well.
I will not consent to any results he may have gained from me if he truly is involved in some sort of study.
What legal ramifications?? I am not using anybody's names, or user names. I'm just naming the website, my opinions, and a few of the more interesting quotes. Not to mention I have to get the TOP grade for any of this to get published, and if it does get published, it will be in a pshychology book based on human emotions, and reactions. It won't be a best seller to say the least. The only other place any of this MIGHT come up, is the anger management class I teach down at the community center. Like I said, no names will be mentioned, not even usernames.
Considering that you have been particularly shady about this, I have already taken the liberty of messaging Dr. Ryan. We'll see if you claim holds any water.
Jesse, Bad Boy wrote: Considering that you have been particularly shady about this, I have already taken the liberty of messaging Dr. Ryan. We'll see if you claim holds any water.
Jesse, Bad Boy wrote: Considering that you have been particularly shady about this, I have already taken the liberty of messaging Dr. Ryan. We'll see if you claim holds any water.
What did you say in the message?
Dr. Ryan,
I apologize for what may follow if in any way it sounds absurd, but I am e-mailing you on the behalf of a small web-based community concerning an alleged student of yours. A poster on our forum who goes by the moniker of "Jamie" (what he claims to be his name) has been particularly disruptive, creating "flame" threads, antagonizing other forum members, as well as a plethora of other issues which are frowned upon in our particular community. Recently, (not more then 3 days ago) "Jamie" created a thread stating that his intent was only to see the reactions for a study he was doing under your sponsorship. Of course, this naturally created concern amongst the forum members (a few were adamant about not letting them be part of any results he may have gleaned from his venture, and the more educated amongst us noted his complete lack of observational objective rigor), and among the site administration in that the site was being used without permission for such a study.
After some debate, it was further questioned the validity of his claims of doing a study. We determined that we should message you and find out if his claims were in fact truth, or if he was abusing your name, as well as your place of tenure. If he HAS been given permission and his claims are true, we would respectfully request that you disallow him from using us in his study (and this would help explain his behavior, for which we will apologize to him). On the other hand, if he is creating a story at the expense of myself and the forum goers, I only need a response denying that you know of this so that we may take action.
Again, I apologize if this seems odd (it feels so from this end), and hope to hear a reply soon.
Jesse, Bad Boy wrote: Considering that you have been particularly shady about this, I have already taken the liberty of messaging Dr. Ryan. We'll see if you claim holds any water.
What did you say in the message?
Dr. Ryan,
I apologize for what may follow if in any way it sounds absurd, but I am e-mailing you on the behalf of a small web-based community concerning an alleged student of yours. A poster on our forum who goes by the moniker of "Jamie" (what he claims to be his name) has been particularly disruptive, creating "flame" threads, antagonizing other forum members, as well as a plethora of other issues which are frowned upon in our particular community. Recently, (not more then 3 days ago) "Jamie" created a thread stating that his intent was only to see the reactions for a study he was doing under your sponsorship. Of course, this naturally created concern amongst the forum members (a few were adamant about not letting them be part of any results he may have gleaned from his venture, and the more educated amongst us noted his complete lack of observational objective rigor), and among the site administration in that the site was being used without permission for such a study.
After some debate, it was further questioned the validity of his claims of doing a study. We determined that we should message you and find out if his claims were in fact truth, or if he was abusing your name, as well as your place of tenure. If he HAS been given permission and his claims are true, we would respectfully request that you disallow him from using us in his study (and this would help explain his behavior, for which we will apologize to him). On the other hand, if he is creating a story at the expense of myself and the forum goers, I only need a response denying that you know of this so that we may take action.
Again, I apologize if this seems odd (it feels so from this end), and hope to hear a reply soon.
Jamie, you used some of our quotes without our permission? Did you even ask whoever owns the site, or the admins/mods if you could do it before you put it up and used the site as a base for this "research"? That is not quite the most legal thing is it?
Jamie, you used some of our quotes without our permission? Did you even ask whoever owns the site, or the admins/mods if you could do it before you put it up and used the site as a base for this "research"? That is not quite the most legal thing is it?
Indeed, Jamie, I'm sure that those you quoted without permission would be perfectly willing to settle out of court with you.
Depending on how good their lawyers are in comparison to yours.
Initiate discovery! Fire the Machines! Throw the switch Igor! THROW THE F***ING SWITCH!
Anarkistsdream wrote:Of course the teacher doesn't know him... The only 'college' Jason i.e., Jamie, is in is online webcourses for fucking parole-ed losers...
Anarkistsdream wrote:Of course the teacher doesn't know him... The only 'college' Jason i.e., Jamie, is in is online webcourses for fucking parole-ed losers...
Jason? I must have missed something.
Must have, because his real name is Jason. Didn't you see the thread where Kayla posted their marriage certificate?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Of course the teacher doesn't know him... The only 'college' Jason i.e., Jamie, is in is online webcourses for fucking parole-ed losers...
Jason? I must have missed something.
Must have, because his real name is Jason. Didn't you see the thread where Kayla posted their marriage certificate?
his real name is Jason, Jamie is his nickname given to him by his father when he was small child (after some Royals guy that was drafted or suppose to be) not sure really. But his name is Jason