isaiah40 wrote:Well like I said earlier. If the feds wouldn't accept my Certification of Live birth to get a passport, then why did congress accept this - oh wait there are all democrats.
Maybe you're just an ornery fucking idiot and are trying to use anecdotal evidence to prove that I'm right in my assessment of you. (Please provide proof that would hold up in the same goddamn courts that your bullshit claims are being tossed out of that what you claim is true, and if it is, that it wasn't just a wanker individual bureaucrat being as ornery as yourself?)
By the way, science has proven that breathing the funny smelling gas that comes out of your car's exhaust pipe isn't good for you. Now might be a good time to stop. Also, stop eating paint chips.
Thank you.
Last edited by pimpdave on Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Money is also spent in speculation that he is the anti-christ. Perhaps he should submit to a full body scan to search for the tell tale 666 mark...which, just has to be there.
Many people say it does.
I suspect less cases make it to court.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk Too much. I know.
“[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State.
(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.
(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]”
... Everybody get that?
... As long as an adult can walk into Hawaii’s version of the Department of Records and provide proof that they are a legal resident of Hawaii, the document is issued.
... But it's really quite irrelevant I think, Kenyan born or Iowa born, Hawaii, Ohio, Madagascar... who cares?
“[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State.
(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
(b) Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the director of health in any manner that the director shall deem appropriate. The director of health may also adopt any rules pursuant to chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.
(c) The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule adopted pursuant to chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]”
... Everybody get that?
... As long as an adult can walk into Hawaii’s version of the Department of Records and provide proof that they are a legal resident of Hawaii, the document is issued.
Selective reading much? Or did the legalese confuse you?
If an adult waltzes into the office they have to prove that their parents were residents of Hawaii for one year or more immediately prior to said adults birth or adoption. They don't have to prove that they themself are a resident.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
The people who should be ashamed are those who continue to tie up OUR tax dollars trying to insinute there is something wrong with Obama's birth.
GET REAL! Do you REALLY think the REPUBLICANS and LIBERATARIENS who WERE IN POWER WHEN HE RAN were just sitting idly by and letting a foreigner run against them? This matter was dropped because THERE IS NO REAL DISPUTE, only people who so dislike Obama that they will bend over backwards, sideways and any way they can to find even the slightest of hints that there might possibly be something wrong.. and then try to declare that as "firm proof".
GIVE IT UP ALREADY!
Then again.. go ahead and put all YOUR effort into this, just don't force tax payers to spend money fighting you!
PLAYER57832 wrote:The people who should be ashamed are those who continue to tie up OUR tax dollars trying to insinute there is something wrong with Obama's birth.
GET REAL! Do you REALLY think the REPUBLICANS and LIBERATARIENS who WERE IN POWER WHEN HE RAN were just sitting idly by and letting a foreigner run against them? This matter was dropped because THERE IS NO REAL DISPUTE, only people who so dislike Obama that they will bend over backwards, sideways and any way they can to find even the slightest of hints that there might possibly be something wrong.. and then try to declare that as "firm proof".
GIVE IT UP ALREADY!
Then again.. go ahead and put all YOUR effort into this, just don't force tax payers to spend money fighting you!
... I've always said, if there were something, anything at all to the "Kenyan connection", Hillary would have found it and run with it during the primary.
PLAYER57832 wrote:The people who should be ashamed are those who continue to tie up OUR tax dollars trying to insinute there is something wrong with Obama's birth.
GET REAL! Do you REALLY think the REPUBLICANS and LIBERATARIENS who WERE IN POWER WHEN HE RAN were just sitting idly by and letting a foreigner run against them? This matter was dropped because THERE IS NO REAL DISPUTE, only people who so dislike Obama that they will bend over backwards, sideways and any way they can to find even the slightest of hints that there might possibly be something wrong.. and then try to declare that as "firm proof".
GIVE IT UP ALREADY!
Then again.. go ahead and put all YOUR effort into this, just don't force tax payers to spend money fighting you!
... I've always said, if there were something, anything at all to the "Kenyan connection", Hillary would have found it and run with it during the primary.
b.k. barunt wrote:You've all been effectively sidetracked away from the main issue here - i demand proof that he is actually a Negro.
Honibaz
Hes not a Negro. The guy that banged his Jewish mom was a Black guy and then we was brought up by rich old white people.
How many hours per day was he brought up by rich old white people, and how many hours per day has been exposed to whatever may deemed as the African-American culture via any forms of media?
b.k. barunt wrote:You've all been effectively sidetracked away from the main issue here - i demand proof that he is actually a Negro.
Honibaz
Hes not a Negro. The guy that banged his Jewish mom was a Black guy and then we was brought up by rich old white people.
You're just repeating the myth. He could be a fooking Chinaman! They can do anything with plastic surgery nowadays - he could be like a reverse Michael Jackson. Hell, he could be a fooking tranny!
