Moderator: Community Team

jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
sad, but it happens. More people leave because they just dont get it/dont read or try out multiple accounts though, so in the larger sceme of things its peanut.thegreekdog wrote:What if the new player/low-ranker never says anything and just leaves the site?
Somewhat subjective yes... right now you can not farm people who have played less than 5 games.thegreekdog wrote:I don't know what to do about it per se. Which, maybe, as you seem to intimate, is the answer. There is nothing we can do it about it.
I would propose that there be some rule indicating that the targeting of new players by experienced players on a systematic and continuous basis is verboten, but it seems like a subjective rule at best.
who says they cantpmchugh wrote:I can't see how this can be implemented without a lot of subjectivity.
But there are people out there trying to take advantage of the dregs of CC, I'm not sure why when some people can't even reach colonel doing it...

Educate don't litigate. Makes sense me thinks. Though it would give people less to complain about and less things to accuse others of doing. If everyone knew about FAMO, then what would the bored and idle complain about? Would be a crime to deny them the chance of accusing people of taking advantage of the stupidity of others.natty_dread wrote:Educate, don't enforce.

Ive often considered the idea of suggesting more helpful pms to include things like forum issues, game issues and choice and addons...but in the end...like myself, when you get to a new site...all most want to do is just try the thing out...win or lose is hardly important, and I suspect most fully expect to lose...and those that can learn probably learn quick.BoganGod wrote:People have the option of using the foe button. If they don't have the intelligence/literacy to work out how to do so, then this site would be to difficult or frustrating for them to navigate anyway. There have been numerous attempts from both ends of the rank scale to rank limit joinability on games. CC management have repeatedly said no, and stated some pretty solid reasons for doing so. FAMO is the answer, rather than trying to extend the reach of the thought police. Again most players play within the rules/spirit of the game. Extending the rule list is not the answer. Maybe a lovely little educational mailout to all new members explaining how to add people to foe and friends lists, and the pros/cons of doing so would be a useful thing.
Why not both?GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:Foeing is for thin skinned individuals, who should stick to playing cross-dressing with their kin.
The loyal drone of C.C.
GS
Well "they" currently are at 2355, pretty much exlusively playing noobs.AAFitz wrote:who says they cantpmchugh wrote:I can't see how this can be implemented without a lot of subjectivity.
But there are people out there trying to take advantage of the dregs of CC, I'm not sure why when some people can't even reach colonel doing it...
What does that have to do with being able to hit colonel? The fact that a player isnt a particular score, hardly ever means they arent capable of that score.pmchugh wrote:Well "they" currently are at 2355, pretty much exlusively playing noobs.AAFitz wrote:who says they cantpmchugh wrote:I can't see how this can be implemented without a lot of subjectivity.
But there are people out there trying to take advantage of the dregs of CC, I'm not sure why when some people can't even reach colonel doing it...![]()
Though david h has shown how to succesfully put this plan into action.
Another good question.pmchugh wrote:I'm meaning what's the point in just picking on noobs if it isn't increasing your rank?
LOL, no.thegreekdog wrote:Does Anyone See a Problem with This?
No one is innocent.thegreekdog wrote:No. My scenario is a hypothetical. I edited my original post to protect the innocent (because they are).
I concur (and thanks for your nice posts above).BoganGod wrote:People have the option of using the foe button. If they don't have the intelligence/literacy to work out how to do so, then this site would be to difficult or frustrating for them to navigate anyway. There have been numerous attempts from both ends of the rank scale to rank limit joinability on games. CC management have repeatedly said no, and stated some pretty solid reasons for doing so. FAMO is the answer, rather than trying to extend the reach of the thought police. Again most players play within the rules/spirit of the game. Extending the rule list is not the answer. Maybe a lovely little educational mailout to all new members explaining how to add people to foe and friends lists, and the pros/cons of doing so would be a useful thing.
No one beats me ten times in a row.AAFitz wrote:I have learned very little from my wins in CC...not to say nothing, but I certainly have learned a quite a bit from watching much better players absolutely demolish me a few times.
Gengoldy wrote:Of all the games I've played, and there have been some poor sports and cursing players out there, you are by far the lowest and with the least class.

If he doesnt know about FAMO button i doubt that he knows what's SoCsafariguy5 wrote:There's a reason why SoC teaches you to play singles esc. games. High rankers can't target low rankers in 8-man esc. games. If anything, the newer players should just learn not play 1v1 maps where the high rankers can just beat them over and over again.

Or thinks SoC is the alternative spelling for dem thangs me puts on me feetdarth emperor wrote:If he doesnt know about FAMO button i doubt that he knows what's SoCsafariguy5 wrote:There's a reason why SoC teaches you to play singles esc. games. High rankers can't target low rankers in 8-man esc. games. If anything, the newer players should just learn not play 1v1 maps where the high rankers can just beat them over and over again.


No its usually the other way around, particularly in a terminator gamesafariguy5 wrote:My point is that this theoretical wouldn't be an issue if new players don't play 1v1's. Now, granted there's no rule against doing so, but high ranks aren't going to be targeting low ranks in a large game.
