GENERAL STONEHAM [warned] lv

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
User avatar
king sam
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 9:18 am
Gender: Male

Re: GENERAL STONEHAM

Post by king sam »

stealth99 wrote: Note to mods: This complaint is being made under the "Abuse" section of this forum. No cheating has occurred and despite the fact one of you issued me a formal warning for submitting an abuse complaint recently, and failed to enforce clear violations of site rules dealing with abuse claiming that no cheating had occurred or no game rules were broken, I'm doing it again. The reason is simple, when I went to the Community Guidelines to find out what to do about this guy, it was clear in telling me to submit a complaint here. Exactly what it told me to do last time. It didn't say that game cheating had to occur as well and was clear that abuse can stand alone as the reason for my complaint. Is there any process for me to appeal the past decision to issue a formal warning to the OP when the rules support the OP and not the decisions of the mod? I've sent an appeal to the mod and got no response so I'm thinking that wasn't the right process. I've also read and read again several times everything I can find to read about rules and the like and I've either forgotten the appeal process or can't find it. Thanks.
Because you were given the answer at least twice and I wasnt going to keep repeating myself. It seems you like to argue a point till you run out of breath especially when your wrong. As this case I havent reviewed it and wont cause of the already ill will you have for the much needed Warning you got last time.

But to set the record straight last time you got the Warning for Spurious reports becuase you made 2 reports after the same person and no violation was happening. Your intentions were solely to try to convict another player of a crime that wasnt being commited and drag his name in the mud. The retort you had was looked at and the decision that was made in the thread Warning you for the Spurious Report was validated.

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 5&start=15
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 1#p2459641

I suggest you lighten up and enjoy the site and game for everyones sake. The Foe button is your friend and should be your first line of defense when you come across a player that "disrupts your gaming experience". If it is something above and beyond banter/trash talking & curse words then do what you did here and it will get looked at,

This will get looked at, I will PM another mod to give it the due attention. But your Warning before was solid.

KS
Image
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: GENERAL STONEHAM

Post by Woodruff »

anonymus wrote:
eddie2 wrote:

2010-03-19 16:52:31 - GENERAL STONEHAM: In fact, I probably fucked your WHORE Mother years back!

this is one comment that i think would come under a flame
why a flame? what if he probably did?
im not defending anybody just defending free speach..

and why would that be offensive by the way? would you be offended if somebody.. ah.. not worth a forumban.. but kind of funny in my oppinion ;)
Calling someone's mother a whore isn't offensive in your view?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
eddie2
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Gender: Male
Location: Southampton uk

Re: GENERAL STONEHAM

Post by eddie2 »

anonymus wrote:
eddie2 wrote:

2010-03-19 16:52:31 - GENERAL STONEHAM: In fact, I probably fucked your WHORE Mother years back!

this is one comment that i think would come under a flame
why a flame? what if he probably did?
im not defending anybody just defending free speach..

and why would that be offensive by the way? would you be offended if somebody.. ah.. not worth a forumban.. but kind of funny in my oppinion ;)
lol i know what you were going to say and my mum said she can remember. her exact words were it was like a maggot when it goes hard. it was gone with the wind. she was soooo disapointed shee went to ann summers :roll:
User avatar
jefjef
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: GENERAL STONEHAM

Post by jefjef »

eddie2 wrote:
anonymus wrote:
eddie2 wrote:

2010-03-19 16:52:31 - GENERAL STONEHAM: In fact, I probably fucked your WHORE Mother years back!

this is one comment that i think would come under a flame
why a flame? what if he probably did?
im not defending anybody just defending free speach..

and why would that be offensive by the way? would you be offended if somebody.. ah.. not worth a forumban.. but kind of funny in my oppinion ;)
lol i know what you were going to say and my mum said she can remember. her exact words were it was like a maggot when it goes hard. it was gone with the wind. she was soooo disapointed shee went to ann summers :roll:

Sooo. Your flaming/baiting anony AND off topic posting in this sacred forum.

AGAIN. There is no rules violation. This is a spurious complaint. The OP knows it was a foe and move along issue. As you do too.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
misher
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:44 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: GENERAL STONEHAM

Post by misher »

Anyone who talks that way shouldn't be playing. Its disrespectful to your opponents, while sometimes comments may get out of hand this is something else entirely, just deliberate bullshit meant to aggravate people from a whiney 10 year old.
eddie2
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Gender: Male
Location: Southampton uk

Re: GENERAL STONEHAM

Post by eddie2 »

jefjef wrote:
eddie2 wrote:
anonymus wrote:
eddie2 wrote:

2010-03-19 16:52:31 - GENERAL STONEHAM: In fact, I probably fucked your WHORE Mother years back!

this is one comment that i think would come under a flame
why a flame? what if he probably did?
im not defending anybody just defending free speach..

and why would that be offensive by the way? would you be offended if somebody.. ah.. not worth a forumban.. but kind of funny in my oppinion ;)
lol i know what you were going to say and my mum said she can remember. her exact words were it was like a maggot when it goes hard. it was gone with the wind. she was soooo disapointed shee went to ann summers :roll:

Sooo. Your flaming/baiting anony AND off topic posting in this sacred forum.

AGAIN. There is no rules violation. This is a spurious complaint. The OP knows it was a foe and move along issue. As you do too.
lolololololololollolollolloolool i cant help it i am wetting myself with laughter jefjef so i said that in response to anon. i was not saying his mum was a whore or that he jacks of to kids photos. and you say i am flaming and baiting a player. but you are quiet willing to defend somone who does say that kind of stuff.
User avatar
jefjef
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: GENERAL STONEHAM

Post by jefjef »

eddie2 wrote:
jefjef wrote:
eddie2 wrote:
anonymus wrote:
why a flame? what if he probably did?
im not defending anybody just defending free speach..

and why would that be offensive by the way? would you be offended if somebody.. ah.. not worth a forumban.. but kind of funny in my oppinion ;)
lol i know what you were going to say and my mum said she can remember. her exact words were it was like a maggot when it goes hard. it was gone with the wind. she was soooo disapointed shee went to ann summers :roll:

Sooo. Your flaming/baiting anony AND off topic posting in this sacred forum.

AGAIN. There is no rules violation. This is a spurious complaint. The OP knows it was a foe and move along issue. As you do too.
lolololololololollolollolloolool i cant help it i am wetting myself with laughter jefjef so i said that in response to anon. i was not saying his mum was a whore or that he jacks of to kids photos. and you say i am flaming and baiting a player. but you are quiet willing to defend somone who does say that kind of stuff.
The difference is game chat vs the C&A Forum.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
squishyg
Posts: 2651
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 11:05 pm
Gender: Female

Re: GENERAL STONEHAM

Post by squishyg »

It took a while for the General to grow on me. I do find him provocative. After getting to know him a bit on the site, I've decided that there's the character of General Stoneham and then there's the person who plays him. I don't always care for the character, but the person is fine by me.

We have some people who adopt strong online personalities on CC. It can be fun a lot of the time to just go along with them, like in an improv.
Image
There is no fog rule and I am no gentleman.
Robinette wrote:
Kaskavel wrote:Seriously. Who is the female conqueror of CC?
Depends on what metric you use...
The coolest is squishyg
User avatar
JoshyBoy
Posts: 3750
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 6:04 pm
Gender: Male
Location: In the gym. Yeah, still there.

Re: GENERAL STONEHAM

Post by JoshyBoy »

This thread is a farce and should never of been started! Lock it down mods!
drunkmonkey wrote:I honestly wonder why anyone becomes a mod on this site. You're the whiniest bunch of players imaginable.
Ron Burgundy wrote:Why don't you go back to your home on Whore Island?
AAFitz
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Re: GENERAL STONEHAM

Post by AAFitz »

GENERAL STONEHAM wrote:AA Fitz, you have already made comments in game chat about me, in games YOU don't play in. Stay the fvck out of my games and stop trolling and spamming me.

Your biggest problem is your nose. You're like some Queen in some knitting club who likes to gossip about others. You send e-mails to others to complain about me and to report me to C.C. administrators.

You find me offensive, yet like a moth to the flame you can't resist staying away from me. Your obsession with me borders on the sick side of sick!

Foe me AA Fitz, FOE ME! But, you can't can you? Do you stay up late at night and fantasize about me? Will you ever change your soiled bed sheets? Is that one sock already encrusted to the point of being uncormfortable to penetrate?

Too funny AA, you tell everyone how awful I am, yet you can't get enough of me. So, you resort to your usual "passive aggressive" postings to incite me and others. It's YOU who is sick and hypocritical.




The loyal drone of C.C.
GS

No, I simply posted what i find to be a disturbing pattern of chat and posts that warrants minors to be careful of.

Whats funny, is you accusing me of seeking you out and at the same time being hypocritical, when it has been you who has done just that, in games, the forum and your posts with a tenacity that makes me nervous. Though I am probably too old for your apparent tastes.

I did stumble on this accusation, and what I found was simply disturbing....but as far as targeting someone, you are the pro at that....you're the one who joins my games, you're the one that mentions me in posts, and the one with some psycho passive aggressive agenda....On your first post after being banned for months, you mention me in your first post....now...correct me if im wrong, but that seems like youre the one whos obsessed...and clearly trying to bait me....But now I fear you are trying to bait others for something far more sinister...But I just hope all your talk of sex which has a very disturbing tone to it, is just for joking and not a cry for help, or worse.
I'm Spanking Monkey now....err...I mean I'm a Spanking Monkey now...that shoots milk
Too much. I know.
User avatar
lord voldemort
Posts: 9596
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:39 am
Gender: Male
Location: Launceston, Australia
Contact:

Re: GENERAL STONEHAM

Post by lord voldemort »

Ok my verdict.

i belive that general stoneham's comments in this game are simply put well out of line.

However this falls under a major/sever infraction. And as such he will receive a warning for this.

lv
Image
Locked

Return to “Closed C&A Reports”