Moderator: Community Team
Taht is verry sad. The teechurs shoud no taht if teh stoodints were red white and blue they shoud be sint to teh doctor.targetman377 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/video/sanfrancisc ... e-19586193
this is just sad. this is pathetic the lack of patriotism in this country where you could get sent home from school because you were red white and blue.
yea and the kids were even half Mexican too.targetman377 wrote:i agree people need to stop being so god dam sensitive.
bedub1 wrote:schools are run by morons

It annoys the hell out of me personally that those high school boys are wearing U.S. flag T-shirts anyway. Pisses me off when depictions of the flag are worn as clothing...it's not respectful in any way. But that's a different issue...targetman377 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/video/sanfrancisc ... e-19586193
this is just sad. this is pathetic the lack of patriotism in this country where you could get sent home from school because you were red white and blue.
why?Woodruff wrote:t annoys the hell out of me personally that those high school boys are wearing U.S. flag T-shirts anyway. Pisses me off when depictions of the flag are worn as clothing...it's not respectful in any way. But that's a different issue...
You're more of a disgusting individual than I originally thought.Woodruff wrote:It annoys the hell out of me personally that those high school boys are wearing U.S. flag T-shirts anyway. Pisses me off when depictions of the flag are worn as clothing...it's not respectful in any way. But that's a different issue...targetman377 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/video/sanfrancisc ... e-19586193
this is just sad. this is pathetic the lack of patriotism in this country where you could get sent home from school because you were red white and blue.
However, that being as it may...the boys were frankly TRYING to instigate trouble. Say what you want, but why else would they be wearing the t-shirts and bandanas on THIS PARTICULAR DAY when, per stated reports by other students, they didn't typically wear those shirts and bandanas? In my view, attempting to incite violence at school is worthy of being sent home.
Now, if it could be shown that these boys did typically wear these shirts and bandanas (by say...wearing them maybe a couple of times per month or so), then no they shouldn't be sent home because the situation is then a significantly different one.
Lootifer wrote:I earn well above average income for my area, i'm educated and I support left wing politics.
jbrettlip wrote:You live in New Zealand. We will call you when we need to make another Hobbit movie.
Yea, I kinda agree. Just because they're half-Mexican in no way makes them "not racist". If they usually wear the clothes, then whatevski, but to wear them specifically on a pretty big Mexican/American holiday in a pretty big Mexican/American school, then they're idiots. Of course they're not going to admit they were trying to incite violence, and of course their annoying parents are going to defend them, but High Schoolers are pretty predictable like this.Woodruff wrote:It annoys the hell out of me personally that those high school boys are wearing U.S. flag T-shirts anyway. Pisses me off when depictions of the flag are worn as clothing...it's not respectful in any way. But that's a different issue...targetman377 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/video/sanfrancisc ... e-19586193
this is just sad. this is pathetic the lack of patriotism in this country where you could get sent home from school because you were red white and blue.
However, that being as it may...the boys were frankly TRYING to instigate trouble. Say what you want, but why else would they be wearing the t-shirts and bandanas on THIS PARTICULAR DAY when, per stated reports by other students, they didn't typically wear those shirts and bandanas? In my view, attempting to incite violence at school is worthy of being sent home.
Now, if it could be shown that these boys did typically wear these shirts and bandanas (by say...wearing them maybe a couple of times per month or so), then no they shouldn't be sent home because the situation is then a significantly different one.
I consider it disrespectful in the same exact way that flag-burning is disrespectful. I recognize that it's not the flag itself, but it's certainly a depiction of it...how is it respectful at all to be sitting your ass on the flag?alex951 wrote:why?Woodruff wrote:It annoys the hell out of me personally that those high school boys are wearing U.S. flag T-shirts anyway. Pisses me off when depictions of the flag are worn as clothing...it's not respectful in any way. But that's a different issue...
Well, that's certainly a compelling and logic-laden rebuttal. Got anything with some actual...you know...intelligence involved, Bradley?bradleybadly wrote:You're more of a disgusting individual than I originally thought.Woodruff wrote:It annoys the hell out of me personally that those high school boys are wearing U.S. flag T-shirts anyway. Pisses me off when depictions of the flag are worn as clothing...it's not respectful in any way. But that's a different issue...targetman377 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/video/sanfrancisc ... e-19586193
this is just sad. this is pathetic the lack of patriotism in this country where you could get sent home from school because you were red white and blue.
However, that being as it may...the boys were frankly TRYING to instigate trouble. Say what you want, but why else would they be wearing the t-shirts and bandanas on THIS PARTICULAR DAY when, per stated reports by other students, they didn't typically wear those shirts and bandanas? In my view, attempting to incite violence at school is worthy of being sent home.
Now, if it could be shown that these boys did typically wear these shirts and bandanas (by say...wearing them maybe a couple of times per month or so), then no they shouldn't be sent home because the situation is then a significantly different one.
f*ck you, Woodruff.
It wasn't meant to be some pussified, watered-down rebuttal which you would define as "logic-laden." It was meant as a direct statement to express disgust at you, personally.Woodruff wrote:Well, that's certainly a compelling and logic-laden rebuttal. Got anything with some actual...you know...intelligence involved, Bradley?

Lootifer wrote:I earn well above average income for my area, i'm educated and I support left wing politics.
jbrettlip wrote:You live in New Zealand. We will call you when we need to make another Hobbit movie.

jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
The bandana was against school policy. End of that. For the rest....targetman377 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/video/sanfrancisc ... e-19586193
this is just sad. this is pathetic the lack of patriotism in this country where you could get sent home from school because you were red white and blue.
LOLb.k. barunt wrote:Taht is verry sad. The teechurs shoud no taht if teh stoodints were red white and blue they shoud be sint to teh doctor.targetman377 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/video/sanfrancisc ... e-19586193
this is just sad. this is pathetic the lack of patriotism in this country where you could get sent home from school because you were red white and blue.
Honibaz
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Your bile tells me simply that you are either unable to read or you just aren't very good at expressing yourself. I pity you.bradleybadly wrote:It wasn't meant to be some pussified, watered-down rebuttal which you would define as "logic-laden." It was meant as a direct statement to express disgust at you, personally.Woodruff wrote:Well, that's certainly a compelling and logic-laden rebuttal. Got anything with some actual...you know...intelligence involved, Bradley?
Perhaps this will help out your comprehension skills a little, you little twerp.
You mean where you thoroughly misrepresented what I said? Ok.john9blue wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=101980&p=2582110#p2581574
^^ Same topic and my thoughts.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
I don't agree. Again, if those students had worn the Mexican colors consistently previously, then no big deal. However, if it was something that those students had not consistently worn previously, then they should also be sent home for attempting to incite violence at school. Hell, it takes FAR LESS than that to be sent home for attempting to incite violence at school...simply wearing certain colors in a certain manner on ANY day can be grounds for it, and for good reason.targetman377 wrote:woodruff i do not agree with you a question for you. lets say same something like this happens
its the 4th of July and every kid is where red white and blue in a school and 5 kids show up where the Mexican colors and flags. If they where sent home what do you think the public would do?
A. they would sue for discrimination and would probably win
B. would call the school principals racist and should respect Mexicans.
and we all know that is what would happen! the only reason its this way is because IT WAS AMERICAN that they where promoting
Ever hear of FREEDOM of SPEECH?Woodruff wrote:I consider it disrespectful in the same exact way that flag-burning is disrespectful. I recognize that it's not the flag itself, but it's certainly a depiction of it...how is it respectful at all to be sitting your ass on the flag?alex951 wrote:why?Woodruff wrote:It annoys the hell out of me personally that those high school boys are wearing U.S. flag T-shirts anyway. Pisses me off when depictions of the flag are worn as clothing...it's not respectful in any way. But that's a different issue...
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
jefjef, I suggest very strongly that you take an English comprehension course. Forthwith! You sure are a dumbass sometimes.jefjef wrote:Ever hear of FREEDOM of SPEECH?Woodruff wrote:I consider it disrespectful in the same exact way that flag-burning is disrespectful. I recognize that it's not the flag itself, but it's certainly a depiction of it...how is it respectful at all to be sitting your ass on the flag?alex951 wrote:why?Woodruff wrote:It annoys the hell out of me personally that those high school boys are wearing U.S. flag T-shirts anyway. Pisses me off when depictions of the flag are worn as clothing...it's not respectful in any way. But that's a different issue...
Of course you have. You exercise it very freely. Sad you fail to support others rights to speak freely.
I do not agree with you but I will also stand for your right to vomit your views even when you try to deny others.
free speech.... Displaying the flag is a pretty simple one.Woodruff wrote:It annoys the hell out of me personally that those high school boys are wearing U.S. flag T-shirts anyway. Pisses me off when depictions of the flag are worn as clothing...it's not respectful in any way. But that's a different issue...targetman377 wrote:http://news.yahoo.com/video/sanfrancisc ... e-19586193
this is just sad. this is pathetic the lack of patriotism in this country where you could get sent home from school because you were red white and blue.
However, that being as it may...the boys were frankly TRYING to instigate trouble. Say what you want, but why else would they be wearing the t-shirts and bandanas on THIS PARTICULAR DAY when, per stated reports by other students, they didn't typically wear those shirts and bandanas? In my view, attempting to incite violence at school is worthy of being sent home.
Now, if it could be shown that these boys did typically wear these shirts and bandanas (by say...wearing them maybe a couple of times per month or so), then no they shouldn't be sent home because the situation is then a significantly different one.
Over my dead body