Moderator: Community Team
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
"AT 09:30 AM on the morning of May 3rd I asked you to do the dishes. As of 05:20 PM they have not been washed!"thegreekdog wrote:Yeah, I have to agree with Jay here. If my kids went to school with an American flag shirt (they wouldn't, but we're talking hypos here), and they were asked to turn it inside out, the principal and I would have a frank discussion. I would probably say, "Hi, I'm thegreekdog. This is mrs. thegreekdog. Did we mention we're lawyers?"
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"

Can't agree more.edwinissweet wrote:but the parents are taking it way too far..
My wife is much better at the "lawyer" thing than I am. Having arguments with her is scary.bradleybadly wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Yeah, I have to agree with Jay here. If my kids went to school with an American flag shirt (they wouldn't, but we're talking hypos here), and they were asked to turn it inside out, the principal and I would have a frank discussion. I would probably say, "Hi, I'm thegreekdog. This is mrs. thegreekdog. Did we mention we're lawyers?"
You're wife is a lawyer, too?
I guess disagreements in the greekdog household would be more like opening and closing arguments. At least you wouldn't have to deal with an occasional sidebar.
That was my point. If it was not clear, then ... well, that was the point.thegreekdog wrote:Yeah, I have to agree with Jay here. If my kids went to school with an American flag shirt (they wouldn't, but we're talking hypos here), and they were asked to turn it inside out, the principal and I would have a frank discussion. I would probably say, "Hi, I'm thegreekdog. This is mrs. thegreekdog. Did we mention we're lawyers?"
wrong. Red is a the color of the Crips (I think.. I may be out of date, there). The flag, is the symbol of the U.S. BIG difference.Woodruff wrote:And yet, it is NOT because of the red shoelaces. Correct?PLAYER57832 wrote:#1 that is not even an esoteric question. It is the reality. It is why many school districts now have uniforms, because the gang threats and so forth are so serious.Woodruff wrote:So if the cause of violence is because someone wore red shoelaces, you would claim that it was only about red shoelaces? Really?PLAYER57832 wrote:Woodruff, come on. When the cause of the violance is display of a U.S. flag, then it IS about the flag.Woodruff wrote: It MAY have been, and it MAY NOT have been (the difference really coming down to the principal's motivation). IF, as I suspect, the principal took the action that he did as a means of student safety, then it isn't about banning the flag.
.. and that is the whole point.
You were the one trying to make the analogy. I say the flag is different and that is the whole point here.Woodruff wrote:Equivalent? You're not even trying any more, are you?PLAYER57832 wrote: #2. If you want to claim that red shoelaces are equivalent to the U.S. flag, then .. well, I guess the flag code is irrelevant.
I am not sure how much that has to do with being a lawyer, in truth...thegreekdog wrote:My wife is much better at the "lawyer" thing than I am. Having arguments with her is scary.bradleybadly wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Yeah, I have to agree with Jay here. If my kids went to school with an American flag shirt (they wouldn't, but we're talking hypos here), and they were asked to turn it inside out, the principal and I would have a frank discussion. I would probably say, "Hi, I'm thegreekdog. This is mrs. thegreekdog. Did we mention we're lawyers?"
You're wife is a lawyer, too?
I guess disagreements in the greekdog household would be more like opening and closing arguments. At least you wouldn't have to deal with an occasional sidebar.
You just made my point for me. Thank you.PLAYER57832 wrote:wrong. Red is a the color of the Crips (I think.. I may be out of date, there). The flag, is the symbol of the U.S. BIG difference.Woodruff wrote:And yet, it is NOT because of the red shoelaces. Correct?PLAYER57832 wrote:#1 that is not even an esoteric question. It is the reality. It is why many school districts now have uniforms, because the gang threats and so forth are so serious.Woodruff wrote:So if the cause of violence is because someone wore red shoelaces, you would claim that it was only about red shoelaces? Really?PLAYER57832 wrote: Woodruff, come on. When the cause of the violance is display of a U.S. flag, then it IS about the flag.
.. and that is the whole point.
You said it had to be about the flag. My analogy shows quite clearly that's not necessarily true. And in what world does "analogy" mean "equivalence"?PLAYER57832 wrote:You were the one trying to make the analogy. I say the flag is different and that is the whole point here.Woodruff wrote:Equivalent? You're not even trying any more, are you?PLAYER57832 wrote:#2. If you want to claim that red shoelaces are equivalent to the U.S. flag, then .. well, I guess the flag code is irrelevant.
edwinissweet wrote:havent read all this. But common sense need to prevail. First off, wearing things with a flag on it is disrespectful.
THAT is the point. Except in this case, the kids wearing the flags were told to turn their t-shirts inside out or to go home, so the latino kids would not be offended or start violence. THAT is an unacceptable response! The ones who should have been sent home were the complainers. This is the U.S. anyone offended by the flag... too bad! Don't like it, leave!edwinissweet wrote: In the US its not a big deal because enough people have complained about it. Latino kids need to stop being so damn sensitive. If you see an American flag at a st patty's day parade no one throws a fit.
This is not about tolerance, just the opposite. It is about the idea that we are supposed to be tolerant of everyone, but hispanic americans are somehow "special". They cannot learn english, like every other culture here has. They not only want their cultures transferred, which is fine, but they want to deny any association with the U.S. That is not fine!edwinissweet wrote: These are dumb kids being dumb kids. Thats understandable, but the parents are taking it way too far.. This is whats wrong with america. Everyone thinks THEIR rights are above others. One day people will learn that tolerance is not a sing of weakness, or so i hope.
If this is your feeling, then how on earth can you justify agreeing with that vice principal.Woodruff wrote:You just made my point for me. Thank you.PLAYER57832 wrote:wrong. Red is a the color of the Crips (I think.. I may be out of date, there). The flag, is the symbol of the U.S. BIG difference.Woodruff wrote:And yet, it is NOT because of the red shoelaces. Correct?PLAYER57832 wrote:#1 that is not even an esoteric question. It is the reality. It is why many school districts now have uniforms, because the gang threats and so forth are so serious.Woodruff wrote: So if the cause of violence is because someone wore red shoelaces, you would claim that it was only about red shoelaces? Really?
You made an analogy between red tennis shoes and the flag, as if they were equal.Woodruff wrote:You said it had to be about the flag. My analogy shows quite clearly that's not necessarily true. And in what world does "analogy" mean "equivalence"?PLAYER57832 wrote:
You were the one trying to make the analogy. I say the flag is different and that is the whole point here.
It seems patently obvious to me that you and I are speaking different languages. We're clearly not communicating, that much is obvious.PLAYER57832 wrote:If this is your feeling, then how on earth can you justify agreeing with that vice principal.Woodruff wrote:You just made my point for me. Thank you.PLAYER57832 wrote:wrong. Red is a the color of the Crips (I think.. I may be out of date, there). The flag, is the symbol of the U.S. BIG difference.Woodruff wrote:And yet, it is NOT because of the red shoelaces. Correct?PLAYER57832 wrote:#1 that is not even an esoteric question. It is the reality. It is why many school districts now have uniforms, because the gang threats and so forth are so serious.
Where in that analogy did I make any distinction about them being equal? The idea behind an analogy is SIMILARITIES, not EQUALITIES.PLAYER57832 wrote:You made an analogy between red tennis shoes and the flag, as if they were equal.Woodruff wrote:You said it had to be about the flag. My analogy shows quite clearly that's not necessarily true. And in what world does "analogy" mean "equivalence"?PLAYER57832 wrote:
You were the one trying to make the analogy. I say the flag is different and that is the whole point here.
And when you make up things out of thin air about my point that are not based on what I have said, it usually means you have not much of a point.PLAYER57832 wrote:And, when you argue semantics instead of the point, it usually means you have not much of a point.
If you are offended by the U.S. flag, then too bad! YOU need to leave, not force me to take my flag down!
OK, i was in high school last year. I know kids. They are predictable. Its as if i can hear them right now..And while this certainly started with kids being kids, it is most definitely about much more. And, sometimes kids can get it right, even if they are a bit dumb most of the time.

Look, there are a couple of issues about which most people do not feel they have to ameliorate. You don't step on my religion and you don't step on my country, in that country.edwinissweet wrote:If you are offended by the U.S. flag, then too bad! YOU need to leave, not force me to take my flag down!
Thats kind of what i was talking about by intolenrance.. You dont have to win EVERY fight. Some times its better to roll your eyes and laugh at ignorance. I agree, those kids are being brought up badly, but so are alot of other kids, not just latinos.

edwinissweet wrote:If you are offended by the U.S. flag, then too bad! YOU need to leave, not force me to take my flag down!
Thats kind of what i was talking about by intolenrance.. You dont have to win EVERY fight. Some times its better to roll your eyes and laugh at ignorance. I agree, those kids are being brought up badly, but so are alot of other kids, not just latinos.
In my humble point of view, you help yourself so you can help someone else. Most kids are either raised to help someone else so they can help you, or the good ole, help yourself and forget about others.
OK, i was in high school last year. I know kids. They are predictable. Its as if i can hear them right now..And while this certainly started with kids being kids, it is most definitely about much more. And, sometimes kids can get it right, even if they are a bit dumb most of the time.
The mexican kids think its cool to show their pride for mexico. They are in the middle of their american dream, no one can touch their ego![]()
Now im not saying the other kids are racist, but they are dumb too. How many times in high school did you see someone say something stupid and ofensive to get a few laughs and nods from their friends? Never? well things have changed since you went to school then.
This is another case of "lets defend our right to be obnoxious" On both sides.
b.k. barunt wrote:Then you must be a pseudoatheist. If you were a real atheist Dan Brown would make your nipples hard.
Tolerance AND critical thinking, common sense are ALL the job of educators. Not the sole job, but they do belong in education.edwinissweet wrote:Yes those kids are wrong. Thats what ive seen saying lol. But the other kids are not wanting to show their pride.. they want to be as annoying as the mexican kids. People that say, "well you cant be sure about that", just want to blow it out of proportion. Its not the educator's job to teach tolerance and common sense to kids. They teach you critical thinking, but without common sense, then you'll end up a confused individual if you attempt to critical think.
woah.. i wonder what parents are suppossed to do in your book thenTolerance AND critical thinking, common sense are ALL the job of educators. Not the sole job, but they do belong in education.

This isn't even indoctrination so much as...just plain weird. The teacher states that the picture is offensive, but won't say why? I really don't get it.silvanricky wrote:Ok, so now we've got another case of where a teacher abuses the authority of their position against students who want to express their patriotism for American.
http://www.kcba.com/Global/story.asp?S=12461078
And people wonder why we get so pissed off at public schools. I went through crap like this in high school. Public schools are becoming more and more like indoctrination camps than places to actually learn.
Those are also responsibilities of parents, in addition to many other things. However, I'm curious as to why you don't believe that teachers shouldn't ALSO be teaching tolerance, critical thinking and common sense?edwinissweet wrote:woah.. i wonder what parents are suppossed to do in your book thenTolerance AND critical thinking, common sense are ALL the job of educators. Not the sole job, but they do belong in education.![]()
I dont believe that teachers shouldnt. But a parents role should be bigger than complaining when they dont agree with the teacher.Woodruff wrote:Those are also responsibilities of parents, in addition to many other things. However, I'm curious as to why you don't believe that teachers shouldn't ALSO be teaching tolerance, critical thinking and common sense?edwinissweet wrote:woah.. i wonder what parents are suppossed to do in your book thenTolerance AND critical thinking, common sense are ALL the job of educators. Not the sole job, but they do belong in education.![]()
