ObamaCare - exchanges ,report your states options!

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by Phatscotty »

Neoteny wrote:Image
one term.

remember, as the worst, most dumbest stupidity stupid dummy president ever, GW got re-elected.

Every year that goes by, I add another letter in the name "Obama" to my handwritten list of one term presidents.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by Woodruff »

Phatscotty wrote: one term.
remember, as the worst, most dumbest stupidity stupid dummy president ever, GW got re-elected.
Every year that goes by, I add another letter in the name "Obama" to my handwritten list of one term presidents.
You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by Phatscotty »

Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote: one term.
remember, as the worst, most dumbest stupidity stupid dummy president ever, GW got re-elected.
Every year that goes by, I add another letter in the name "Obama" to my handwritten list of one term presidents.
You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.
And if you were a true vulcan you would have responded there are 5 letters in Obama and only 4 years in a term....

Spock Fail

Image

The 5 letters to 4 year term ratio stands when U logicate 5 years worth of damage into 4 years.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by Woodruff »

Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote: one term.
remember, as the worst, most dumbest stupidity stupid dummy president ever, GW got re-elected.
Every year that goes by, I add another letter in the name "Obama" to my handwritten list of one term presidents.
You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.
And if you were a true vulcan you would have responded there are 5 letters in Obama and only 4 years in a term....

Spock Fail

Image

The 5 letters to 4 year term ratio stands when U logicate 5 years worth of damage into 4 years.
You don't have any idea what I was referring to, do you?
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote: one term.
remember, as the worst, most dumbest stupidity stupid dummy president ever, GW got re-elected.
Every year that goes by, I add another letter in the name "Obama" to my handwritten list of one term presidents.
You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.
And if you were a true vulcan you would have responded there are 5 letters in Obama and only 4 years in a term....

Spock Fail

Image

The 5 letters to 4 year term ratio stands when U logicate 5 years worth of damage into 4 years.
You don't have any idea what I was referring to, do you?
I'd say more old M.
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by Woodruff »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Phatscotty wrote: one term.
remember, as the worst, most dumbest stupidity stupid dummy president ever, GW got re-elected.
Every year that goes by, I add another letter in the name "Obama" to my handwritten list of one term presidents.
You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.
And if you were a true vulcan you would have responded there are 5 letters in Obama and only 4 years in a term....

Spock Fail

Image

The 5 letters to 4 year term ratio stands when U logicate 5 years worth of damage into 4 years.
You don't have any idea what I was referring to, do you?
I'd say more old M.
Now I don't have any idea what you are referring to.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Woodruff wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
Woodruff wrote: You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.

I'd say more old M.
Now I don't have any idea what you are referring to.
Sorry, Tide rivals. (intentional deflect).. at least it used to be so.
User avatar
Neoteny
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by Neoteny »

Nowadays it's any SEC West team that's decent. (Aubrun is still kinda fun [and you have to say it like that])
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by MeDeFe »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
Woodruff wrote: You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.

I'd say more old M.
Now I don't have any idea what you are referring to.
Sorry, Tide rivals. (intentional deflect).. at least it used to be so.
Is this some sort of Star Trek X-Men orchestrated hymns crossover?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by PLAYER57832 »

MeDeFe wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
Woodruff wrote: You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.

I'd say more old M.
Now I don't have any idea what you are referring to.
Sorry, Tide rivals. (intentional deflect).. at least it used to be so.
Is this some sort of Star Trek X-Men orchestrated hymns crossover?
YesLOL
User avatar
thegreekdog
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Gender: Male
Location: Philadelphia

Re: Socialized Healthcare

Post by thegreekdog »

BigBallinStalin wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have). I think some parts of his job creation act were really effective. Other parts, not so much. I disagree with the bailouts, but a Republican president would have done the same thing, so I can't really have a beef with President Obama on that one. I'm kind of disappointed about his lack of action on gay rights and the Patriot Act, but he has time for that stuff. I'd give him a C+ if I were grading him (Bush gets a D, Clinton gets a B-, Bush I gets a B+, Reagan gets an A for point of reference).

TGD, why would you rate Bush with a B+?

His handling of the Panama canal situation was very... blunt, to say the least. That and the Persian Gulf War by not allowing more time for Saudi Arabia to negotiate some kind of arrangement, and basically the poor handling of that war (in the long-term sense of things).

Of course, I'm overlooking domestic issues and some other things, so I'd like for you to enlighten me.
I thought his handling of the Panama Canal was fine. The Persian Gulf War was fine (I don't think long-term we can have it both ways, at least from a consistency in politics perspective - either you were for the Bush I limited war and then you are against the current conflict or you were for a Bush I total war and then you are for the current conflict). I guess I could go B or B-, but he wasn't a bad president, at least not like his son.
Image
User avatar
Woodruff
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by Woodruff »

MeDeFe wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:
Woodruff wrote: You Crimson Tide fans are all alike.

I'd say more old M.
Now I don't have any idea what you are referring to.
Sorry, Tide rivals. (intentional deflect).. at least it used to be so.
Is this some sort of Star Trek X-Men orchestrated hymns crossover?
Only if you're Wolverine or a Vulcan.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by Phatscotty »

A few more pieces to the Repeal scenario have fit into place. The way this is looking, Obama will not be able to stop it from getting repealed.
User avatar
Neoteny
Posts: 3396
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by Neoteny »

Care to elaborate?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Phatscotty wrote:A few more pieces to the Repeal scenario have fit into place. The way this is looking, Obama will not be able to stop it from getting repealed.
Obama, no. The American people, though can and likely will.

Even the tea-partiers in many areas are having to agree that we need to be paying more, not less for certain things, like schools and health care. Folks are realizing that the REAL dupe was the Republicans who wanted nothing more than a big insurance industry wave.
User avatar
Titanic
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Northampton, UK

Re: Socialized Healthcare

Post by Titanic »

thegreekdog wrote:
I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have). I think some parts of his job creation act were really effective. Other parts, not so much. I disagree with the bailouts, but a Republican president would have done the same thing, so I can't really have a beef with President Obama on that one. I'm kind of disappointed about his lack of action on gay rights and the Patriot Act, but he has time for that stuff. I'd give him a C+ if I were grading him (Bush gets a D, Clinton gets a B-, Bush I gets a B+, Reagan gets an A for point of reference).
Reagan and Bush Sr. both better then Clinton? Clinton had the highest approval rating at the end of his term (even with the hugely overblown Lewinski thing) out of all the presidents post-war. Never mind getting into actual policy or legacy but I don't see how you can rate both of them (Bushalso being only a 1 termer) above him by some margin.
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by Phatscotty »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:A few more pieces to the Repeal scenario have fit into place. The way this is looking, Obama will not be able to stop it from getting repealed.
Obama, no. The American people, though can and likely will.

Even the tea-partiers in many areas are having to agree that we need to be paying more, not less for certain things, like schools and health care. Folks are realizing that the REAL dupe was the Republicans who wanted nothing more than a big insurance industry wave.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

because Player knows the tea party so well....
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Socialized Healthcare

Post by Phatscotty »

thegreekdog wrote:

I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have).
I don't know. He told us what the problem with the economy was, and then said he had the answers. His answers were not correct. He can not now go back and say he did not understand the economy before. He should never have pretended that he could do anything about it in the first place..
User avatar
Titanic
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:58 pm
Location: Northampton, UK

Re: Socialized Healthcare

Post by Titanic »

Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:

I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have).
I don't know. He told us what the problem with the economy was, and then said he had the answers. His answers were not correct. He can not now go back and say he did not understand the economy before. He should never have pretended that he could do anything about it in the first place..
Well the economy is on the up so maybe he did have the answers....
User avatar
Phatscotty
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Socialized Healthcare

Post by Phatscotty »

Titanic wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:

I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have).
I don't know. He told us what the problem with the economy was, and then said he had the answers. His answers were not correct. He can not now go back and say he did not understand the economy before. He should never have pretended that he could do anything about it in the first place..
Well the economy is on the up so maybe he did have the answers....
what aspects of the "economy is on the up" are you using?
PopeBenXVI
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 12:03 am
Gender: Male
Location: citta del Vaticano
Contact:

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by PopeBenXVI »

PLAYER57832 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:A few more pieces to the Repeal scenario have fit into place. The way this is looking, Obama will not be able to stop it from getting repealed.
Obama, no. The American people, though can and likely will.

Even the tea-partiers in many areas are having to agree that we need to be paying more, not less for certain things, like schools and health care. Folks are realizing that the REAL dupe was the Republicans who wanted nothing more than a big insurance industry wave.
Yes, all I hear at the Tea Parties and in the emails is how we need to pay more for things. That is why we get together Player, to oppose lack of money being spent on things. :roll:

We already pay more per child in education than any other country but we clearly need to spend more because it is working like a charm. :lol:

You prove Michael Savages famous line quite nicely. "Liberalism is a mental disorder" You truly exist in your own fantasy world.
Image

semen est sanguis Christianorum
PopeBenXVI
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 12:03 am
Gender: Male
Location: citta del Vaticano
Contact:

Re: Socialized Healthcare

Post by PopeBenXVI »

Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:

I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have).
I don't know. He told us what the problem with the economy was, and then said he had the answers. His answers were not correct. He can not now go back and say he did not understand the economy before. He should never have pretended that he could do anything about it in the first place..
What is truly amazing is his claim that things would be worse if he had not done what he did. He has absolutely no proof to back that up and it is pure speculation. He can't even tell us if the money he spend saved or created the jobs but yet he can give us the number of jobs it saved or created. :-s Can someone explain to me how that works? If his dishonestly and diarrhea of the mouth where not so bad and the situation so serious this would be incredibly funny.

From a Social Justice perspective his policies are making the country poorer which means more homeless, more children not getting the food they need, elderly loosing their retirement investments and not being able to go back to work, less money going to charities in 3rd world countries to help the destitute.......and the beat goes on with immigration reform because he does not really care about jobs.
Image

semen est sanguis Christianorum
User avatar
Nobunaga
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:09 am
Location: West of Osaka

Re: Socialized Healthcare

Post by Nobunaga »

Phatscotty wrote:
Titanic wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:

I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have).
I don't know. He told us what the problem with the economy was, and then said he had the answers. His answers were not correct. He can not now go back and say he did not understand the economy before. He should never have pretended that he could do anything about it in the first place..
Well the economy is on the up so maybe he did have the answers....
what aspects of the "economy is on the up" are you using?
... It's amazing. "The economy is up" says the Chicago thug, and the networks fall in line. Meanwhile, unemployment rises yet again and foreclosures set a new record.

... I suppose it all depends on one's understanding of the term, "up".

...
spurgistan
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm

Re: Socialized Healthcare

Post by spurgistan »

Nobunaga wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Titanic wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:

I don't think we can judge President Obama with respect to economics yet (except for a few things I've already identified - namely the cost-benefit of the job creation act and the wanton spending of money that we don't have).
I don't know. He told us what the problem with the economy was, and then said he had the answers. His answers were not correct. He can not now go back and say he did not understand the economy before. He should never have pretended that he could do anything about it in the first place..
Well the economy is on the up so maybe he did have the answers....
what aspects of the "economy is on the up" are you using?
... It's amazing. "The economy is up" says the Chicago thug, and the networks fall in line. Meanwhile, unemployment rises yet again and foreclosures set a new record.

... I suppose it all depends on one's understanding of the term, "up".

...
The recovery has begun, even though it's obviously hard to tell from driving down Main Street. There has always been a documented gap between when recessions begins ending and a decrease in unemployment numbers. The major thing is that, as companies begin hiring again, discouraged workers begin reentering the labor market, so that even as the population of total unemployed people decreases, the number of unemployed people looking for work increases.

Image
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
User avatar
GabonX
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 am
Gender: Male
Contact:

Re: Repealing Socialized Healthcare

Post by GabonX »

One of these days you guys are gonna run out of kool aid..
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”