game 7086096
My opinion is that the 2 players in this game are a team as I read and follow the game chat;
do you agree and can they make their points this wayy again!?
the 2 playyers are :
thedice and billclinton13
2 against 1 [Cleared] KS
Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
-
TheForgivenOne
- Posts: 5998
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2009 8:27 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Lost somewhere in the snow. HELP ME
Re: 2 against 1
Fixed report.egerskydiver wrote: Accused:
thedice
billclinton13
Accused of:
Secret Diplomacy
Game Number:
Game 7086096
Comments:
My opinion is that the 2 players in this game are a team as I read and follow the game chat;
do you agree and can they make their points this wayy again!?
Also, when someone is dominating in a 3 player game, more than likely the 2 weaker players will team up against the stronger player.
Re: 2 against 1
Thanks TheForgivenOne . We really appreciate you cleaning these up for us but if the originators dont start filling the claims out correctly then their not going to get their cases looked into. They cant keep relying on other players in the community to make sense of what they want looked at.
The form is there for a reason, even if your not familiar with the forum or threads you have to manually delete the writing in place that is set there as a template to make a claim for us to go by.
As for this case, no I dont agree.
These 2 are Cleared of multis.
As far as a diplomacy, if you were asking for them to be looked at for that it appears that they didnt have one of those either. They both understood to attack you when you became a threat of winning the game. Foe & Rate Accordingly
The form is there for a reason, even if your not familiar with the forum or threads you have to manually delete the writing in place that is set there as a template to make a claim for us to go by.
As for this case, no I dont agree.
These 2 are Cleared of multis.
As far as a diplomacy, if you were asking for them to be looked at for that it appears that they didnt have one of those either. They both understood to attack you when you became a threat of winning the game. Foe & Rate Accordingly
