(L)

[White Moose]

Must be tough.. not being able to play games when you work. Real tough.

Haha. We'll play some games when you're allowed back.

I think that first sentence is sarcastic? Hell, I know plenty of people who only play at work! I'm still young so I have time to learn.

That would be bloody fantastic, if it happened. You taught me a lot back in the day!

Yes, the first sentence was sarcastic .

[Nameless.One]

At least speak up if you're voting against, no need to hide in any corners here! This is a family friendly website, remember?

[eddie2]

lol lets see how many posts you can make before it gets locked and you get guested

[Nameless.One]

lol lets see how many posts you can make before it gets locked and you get guested

That's going to be very soon eddie.

[#1_stunna]

sighs

[Nameless.One]

sighs

'Sup babez??

[eddie2]

lol lets see though say your g/byes to all and see you tommorow

[#1_stunna]

sighs

'Sup babez??

why would some one vote NO!?!

[Nameless.One]

sighs

'Sup babez??

why would some one vote NO!?!

They have their reasons, it's just a shame that they don't have the guts to show themselves.

I wonder if I'll be banned when I come online tomorrow morning? Would be a revelation if I wasn't..

[LFAW]

$400!!! cmon Lack, show some heart!

[Nameless.One]

=D> $400!!! cmon Lack, show some heart!

I remember playing you in a four or five player freestyle escalating on Vancouver. There was you, me and some noobs, though I was a 'noob' too. I was going to win that game, until I mis-calculated my attack route, thereby giving you the kill.

Oh well! Hai! *waves

[#1_stunna]

=D> $400!!! cmon Lack, show some heart!

woah, hey LFAW!!

[LFAW]

Sup stunna

=D> $400!!! cmon Lack, show some heart!

I remember playing you in a four or five player freestyle escalating on Vancouver. There was you, me and some noobs, though I was a 'noob' too. I was going to win that game, until I mis-calculated my attack route, thereby giving you the kill.

Oh well! Hai! *waves

Oh yes, the day when clickies wouldn't work good game though very close... didn't you leave 1 blue or something next to my 12? lol

[Caymanmew]

so he finally shut that other one down i think cawmanew would of complained about it being abuseive

Most likely, though I'm not as much of a dick as that guy is.

i just voted you should be aloud to stay should i change it?

[obliterationX]

sighs

'Sup babez??

why would some one vote NO!?!

They have their reasons, it's just a shame that they don't have the guts to show themselves.

I wonder if I'll be banned when I come online tomorrow morning? Would be a revelation if I wasn't..

... and no such revelation there is.

[Army of GOD]

Don't worry Josh, you have my full support!

[Premier2k]

I voted no but would change my mind if someone can explain to me the following......

This is not a flame nor meant to cause offence but is merely a question.....(as I dont know the background)

Why should CC give nameless.one a second chance when he was convicted for being a multi?
Do we give other multi's a second chance?
Why should we give nameless.one a second chance, what makes him special/different?

Just curious...

Premier2k

[obliterationX]

I voted no but would change my mind if someone can explain to me the following......

This is not a flame nor meant to cause offence but is merely a question.....(as I dont know the background)

Why should CC give nameless.one a second chance when he was convicted for being a multi?
Do we give other multi's a second chance?
Why should we give nameless.one a second chance, what makes him special/different?

Just curious...

Premier2k

The fatness of one's wallet determines whether or not they can evade the rules concerning multiple accounts. But, apparently not, in this situation.

[Premier2k]

I voted no but would change my mind if someone can explain to me the following......

This is not a flame nor meant to cause offence but is merely a question.....(as I dont know the background)

Why should CC give nameless.one a second chance when he was convicted for being a multi?
Do we give other multi's a second chance?
Why should we give nameless.one a second chance, what makes him special/different?

Just curious...

Premier2k

The fatness of one's wallet determines whether or not they can evade the rules concerning multiple accounts. But, apparently not, in this situation.

Yeah I figured that would be the case. My vote stays at no then for now.
I did begin to wonder if anyone was able to justify it, I guess not...

[obliterationX]

I voted no but would change my mind if someone can explain to me the following......

This is not a flame nor meant to cause offence but is merely a question.....(as I dont know the background)

Why should CC give nameless.one a second chance when he was convicted for being a multi?
Do we give other multi's a second chance?
Why should we give nameless.one a second chance, what makes him special/different?

Just curious...

Premier2k

The fatness of one's wallet determines whether or not they can evade the rules concerning multiple accounts. But, apparently not, in this situation.

Yeah I figured that would be the case. My vote stays at no then for now.
I did begin to wonder if anyone was able to justify it, I guess not...

I was actually trying to establish an unjustification. People shouldn't be able to buy their way around the rules. Just because one cheater has $25 more than another cheater doesn't mean he should be allowed to play.

[Premier2k]

I voted no but would change my mind if someone can explain to me the following......

This is not a flame nor meant to cause offence but is merely a question.....(as I dont know the background)

Why should CC give nameless.one a second chance when he was convicted for being a multi?
Do we give other multi's a second chance?
Why should we give nameless.one a second chance, what makes him special/different?

Just curious...

Premier2k

The fatness of one's wallet determines whether or not they can evade the rules concerning multiple accounts. But, apparently not, in this situation.

Yeah I figured that would be the case. My vote stays at no then for now.
I did begin to wonder if anyone was able to justify it, I guess not...

I was actually trying to establish an unjustification. People shouldn't be able to buy their way around the rules. Just because one cheater has $25 more than another cheater doesn't mean he should be allowed to play.

and I completely agree with you!
But, although people want cheats removed from the site, it seems that if they are a well liked player that nameless.one seems to be then they are willing to say "oh give him another chance". I don't get that... a cheat is a cheat...

[jammyjames]

I voted no but would change my mind if someone can explain to me the following......

This is not a flame nor meant to cause offence but is merely a question.....(as I dont know the background)

Why should CC give nameless.one a second chance when he was convicted for being a multi?
Do we give other multi's a second chance?
Why should we give nameless.one a second chance, what makes him special/different?

Just curious...

Premier2k

The fatness of one's wallet determines whether or not they can evade the rules concerning multiple accounts. But, apparently not, in this situation.

Yeah I figured that would be the case. My vote stays at no then for now.
I did begin to wonder if anyone was able to justify it, I guess not...

I was actually trying to establish an unjustification. People shouldn't be able to buy their way around the rules. Just because one cheater has $25 more than another cheater doesn't mean he should be allowed to play.

and I completely agree with you!
But, although people want cheats removed from the site, it seems that if they are a well liked player that nameless.one seems to be then they are willing to say "oh give him another chance". I don't get that... a cheat is a cheat...

I dont really see where he has cheated though, creating multiple accounts is against the rules sure, but how can it be cheating if you never play against other multis.. he hasn't cheated, just broken the rules.

[obliterationX]

The fatness of one's wallet determines whether or not they can evade the rules concerning multiple accounts. But, apparently not, in this situation.

Yeah I figured that would be the case. My vote stays at no then for now.
I did begin to wonder if anyone was able to justify it, I guess not...

I was actually trying to establish an unjustification. People shouldn't be able to buy their way around the rules. Just because one cheater has $25 more than another cheater doesn't mean he should be allowed to play.

and I completely agree with you!
But, although people want cheats removed from the site, it seems that if they are a well liked player that nameless.one seems to be then they are willing to say "oh give him another chance". I don't get that... a cheat is a cheat...

I dont really see where he has cheated though, creating multiple accounts is against the rules sure, but how can it be cheating if you never play against other multis.. he hasn't cheated, just broken the rules.

I always thought that breaking the rules is cheating?

[Premier2k]

I dont really see where he has cheated though, creating multiple accounts is against the rules sure, but how can it be cheating if you never play against other multis.. he hasn't cheated, just broken the rules.

So, you're saying that creating multiple accounts but not playing other multi's isn't cheating?
Did nameless.one have premium when he created the second account? Was it an attempt to get around the max 4 games rule? If he was already premium, then why create the second account?

Surely we have to draw the line somewhere.....

[jammyjames]

I dont really see where he has cheated though, creating multiple accounts is against the rules sure, but how can it be cheating if you never play against other multis.. he hasn't cheated, just broken the rules.

So, you're saying that creating multiple accounts but not playing other multi's isn't cheating?
Did nameless.one have premium when he created the second account? Was it an attempt to get around the max 4 games rule? If he was already premium, then why create the second account?

Surely we have to draw the line somewhere.....

Valid point, but as the point has already been made, this kid will just continue to make more and more accounts just wasting away server space etc. If he was allowed back in he would have just one account, and as he has clearly stated he would start off a fresh again, it's just saving time on the multi hunters behalf and space on the server.