Soooo much for giving you guys the benefit of the doubt
CC ABUSE OF POWER
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
-
lord voldemort
- Posts: 9596
- Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:39 am
- Gender: Male
- Location: Launceston, Australia
- Contact:
Re: CC ABUSE OF POWER
I didnt think the thread needed a lock...generally when a mod comes in and says ey stop posting in here...people listen
Soooo much for giving you guys the benefit of the doubt
Soooo much for giving you guys the benefit of the doubt
-
porkenbeans
- Posts: 2546
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:06 pm
Re: CC ABUSE OF POWER
Man I gotta tell ya, Your words seem very contradictory to me. I do not know what kind of games you guys are playing in this sub-forum, and I do not have the time, or interest in learning, so I will just give myself a "move along".lord voldemort wrote:I didnt think the thread needed a lock...generally when a mod comes in and says ey stop posting in here...people listen
Soooo much for giving you guys the benefit of the doubt
Re: CC ABUSE OF POWER
Darwins_Bane wrote:Woodruff wrote:Darwins_Bane wrote:Woodruff wrote:You CAN still play unlimited games. They just can't all be speed games. There was no violation of TOS.
I'm sorry but if they need to hide behind a technicality like that its sad.
It's not a technicality. It is a simply-stated fact. Unlimited speed games were never promised in the TOS.
If you wanna argue about it. a speed game is a game. they promise unlimited simultaneous games. thats breach of contract.
It doesn't promise anything about how many games waiting for players that you can have.
Re: CC ABUSE OF POWER
trapyoung wrote:The proper way to have addressed this situation is to have submitted it as a suggestion and not had it be a unilateral determination of the site. The site is user-based and user-driven. The content, suggestions, bug reports, add-ons are almost exclusively user-submitted and it is something inherent to the site. New and old users would have been able to negotiate the change and had a vote on it. Doing so would have been proper because the user contract recognizes that other users will affect the gaming experience by the content, suggestions, etc. submitted.
According to your quote then this issue was addressed properly in the suggestions froum. viewtopic.php?f=470&t=118009&hilit=limit+speed+games. None of the members voicing dissent in this thread bothered to take the time to post in suggestion thread.