Moderator: Community Team
Teutonics wrote:What about speed games that go on & on & on? Most people, who sign up for a speed game, don't expect to be still playing 6+ hours later. The real world intervenes and people have got to get some sleep, go to work, etc. The guys with no lives can play on forever, but most folks can't be tied down to their computers for so long.
army of nobunaga wrote:i like this... a button that 100% people can press and get out of a horrible game.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Army of GOD wrote:I think the only way this should be implemented is that if there is no point changes at all. I just see another way people can cheat the system. If the main purpose of this sugg is to end long games, then points shouldn't really matter anyway.
jefjef wrote:army of nobunaga wrote:i like this... a button that 100% people can press and get out of a horrible game.
We already have a button for this. It is labeled AUTO ASSAULT.
Want to end a game? Play the damn thing.
jefjef wrote:army of nobunaga wrote:i like this... a button that 100% people can press and get out of a horrible game.
We already have a button for this. It is labeled AUTO ASSAULT.
Want to end a game? Play the damn thing.
Army of GOD wrote:I think the only way this should be implemented is that if there is no point changes at all. I just see another way people can cheat the system. If the main purpose of this sugg is to end long games, then points shouldn't really matter anyway.
Incandenza wrote:jefjef wrote:army of nobunaga wrote:i like this... a button that 100% people can press and get out of a horrible game.
We already have a button for this. It is labeled AUTO ASSAULT.
Want to end a game? Play the damn thing.
So your solution is to suicide? Gotcha. The point here is to find alternatives to suiciding.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
Commander62890 wrote:I am all for this. It is a great solution for all of the stalemated games out there.
jefjef, you keep saying the same thing over and over. We hear your point... please stop. There aren't many good players that share your views...
For clarity, I'm sure you're okay at 1v1s and team games, but your attitude towards the type of game that this suggestion targets is naive.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
waseemalim wrote:Two add my two cents:
The problem is not just that these games become a drag on people who play it. But that it also discourages quite a few people to take on games like these. I haven't played a no cards standard game in years because I tend to get sick after 50 rounds. Sure I can out-wait other people, but I don't have much fun doing so.
This is something that needs attention, I think it will improve the experience for a lot of people.
AndyDufresne wrote:What sort of impact would this have on the Cheating/Abuse side? That is something probably to discuss as well---if it makes it easier for abuse to occur, if it makes no difference, if it makes it harder, etc.
--Andy
Incandenza wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:What sort of impact would this have on the Cheating/Abuse side? That is something probably to discuss as well---if it makes it easier for abuse to occur, if it makes no difference, if it makes it harder, etc.
--Andy
A major component of this would be a minimum round number, say 75 or 100. The idea would be to make it almost impossible for all but the most insanely committed to abuse in any way.
AndyDufresne wrote:I'd keep complicated point changes out of the suggestion---since it'll decrease the likelihood of anything coming to fruition.
The best option may be a 'canceling of points' where there is no exchanged, but I'm not even sure if that is complicated from a coding stand point.
--Andy
Return to Archived Suggestions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users