Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
fixed the linksCanuckSteve wrote:Accused:
A.D. of Spain
Tetracorp of Spain
The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
perhaps one player or friends with secret diplomacy
Game number(s):
Game 7281245
Comments:
Both players joined as the last two players, at the same time, and started round one 14 seconds apart.
Round 2 - nine minutes apart
Round 3 - 74 seconds apart
Round 6: 45 minutes apart ending round
Round 7: both started round within 1 minute of end of previous round

actually fixed the linksMasli wrote:fixed the linksCanuckSteve wrote:Accused:
A.D. of Spain
Tetracorp of Spain
The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
perhaps one player or friends with secret diplomacy
Game number(s):
Game 7281245
Comments:
Both players joined as the last two players, at the same time, and started round one 14 seconds apart.
Round 2 - nine minutes apart
Round 3 - 74 seconds apart
Round 6: 45 minutes apart ending round
Round 7: both started round within 1 minute of end of previous round


and I get a few "experts" treating me like a child.The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
perhaps one player or friends with secret diplomacy"


One account per person, period. Not one for being daddy and one for being point-whoreHome Page wrote:I will only ever use one account
CanuckSteve wrote:WOW ... can you not read!?!?
A) I notified conquerclub of my intentions prior to setting up the duplicate account, stating I would not do so if it caused problems. they did not reply. I did not try to hide.
b) there is no intention to violate any rules. Only to be a good dad and play with my children. There was no attempt to violate any rules.
c) There was no violation of rules. DaddyRon only played with the children, and never entered a game with anyone else, nor any game with CanuckSteve.
At worst, I should have been asked to delete the DaddyRon account, and although nothing was said when I set up the account, be warned not to do this again. The penalty does not fit the crime - if there is a crime at all.
Does this answer your question?
regards
The parts in red contradict each other.CanuckSteve wrote:TO jrh_cardinal
They dd reply ... on June 2 ... King Achilles said
"This is fine. Still, in the long run, you really can't stop for each one of you to play against others. Your relationship shall be noted in our records. Still, if ever one of you gets reported for being a multi or of having a secret diplomacy, that report will still be subjected for an investigation."
But I did nothing which could be considered secret diplomacy. Only play two games with my children

At first you said the didn't reply then you said the did reply. Did they or didn't they reply?CanuckSteve wrote:your point?

thank you. If, indeed, you sent in an e-ticket that said "I am creating a second account for myself (notice, you can't say my kids are creating more accounts on the same network, because that is allowed) so that I can play with my kids. Is this acceptable?" and then King A actually replied how you said, then I agree, you should get your premium back, but the other account should still be guested since you still can't have two accounts, it was just a miscommunication between you and King A.Evil Semp wrote:At first you said the didn't reply then you said the did reply. Did they or didn't they reply?CanuckSteve wrote:your point?