Moderator: Community Team
I know I wasn't on blitz's or rabbiton's back like this. Nope, just dizzlemgconstruction wrote:Wow the envy & jealousy that festers up every time someone makes conqueror is crazy.![]()
he's "on vacation". He hasn't played a game since he became conqueror besides finishing up the two or three he was in. It'll be interesting to see what he does after 3-4 weeks are up. Will he admit he doesn't want to play so he can't lose points, and just play 1 game to stay officially active? Or will he actually start at least keeping a few games goingFarangDemon wrote:Emmdizzle - Congrats for making conqueror. I don't hate the player. I respect your ingenuity and ambition. I fault CC for failing to provide an alternative way to gain recognition by other means.
Game 7356659
I hope you accept my doubs Berlin challenge. I sent you password in PM. We are both brigs so if you pick a low ranked teammate our scores will be even.
If you'd rather play a different map, please send me an invite.
If you are busy at the moment I understand - you must be flooded with similar challenges.
Cheers,
FarangDemon

JBlombier wrote:I really fail to see the harm in becoming Conqueror that way. He set a goal, he made it and he used an effective method to do it. Yeah, he doesn't have any diversity among his map/setting-choice, but that's his decision. I hear people saying "I play everything, because that's more fun". That's what I do too, but obviously not what Emmdizzle wants right now. What was it again, different folks...
The word 'honorable' has been named a lot in this thread. Cheating is dishonorable, breaking a truce on a breakpoint in the game is dishonorable, secret diplomacy, etc... Since everyone seems to agree he is not cheating, I don't understand why everyone is so upset. I can't even remember seeing a Conqueror who didn't use a specific method. He found another way to do it and it worked, so... congratulations, Emmdizzle!
I don't know Emmdizzle the slightest bit, but searching through his games, it seems all right to me. He's put a lot of time in this game to become Conqueror and y'all should be happy you have other things to do, instead of blaming him for doing this.
Can't wait for the next Conqueror, so we can have a new thread about a new method that was used this time.
- JBlombier
"I'd rather be right than president" Henry Clay
To me The part where you prey on Weak players is pretty dishonorable. Aborting the game if any one higher than lieutenant Joins is pretty dishonorable. If he was honorable he would accept any challenge he was faced with. No it's not cheating, and it shouldn't be stopped, but these are the kinds of games I avoid. I don't like people that play like this, or more to the point, care more about there score than actually playing the game. But hey it's his choice. It's not the way I would conduct myself but I also don't care enough about gunning for the number one spot to get worked about someone achieving the goal in this fashion.The word 'honorable' has been named a lot in this thread. Cheating is dishonorable, breaking a truce on a breakpoint in the game is dishonorable, secret diplomacy, etc... Since everyone seems to agree he is not cheating, I don't understand why everyone is so upset. I can't even remember seeing a Conqueror who didn't use a specific method. He found another way to do it and it worked, so... congratulations, Emmdizzle!
yeahyeah we have heard it now, apparently you still feel you need to defend yourself so maybe there is something to the critisism you are arcing here..Emmdizzle wrote:Sour grapes cuz you'll never see the top my man.
Yes, we all know that the conqs need to use... "unorthodox" tactics to get there. However, I believe that an argument is being made here that this player's abuse of the invite system goes beyond what other conqs have done. I'm not necessarily saying I agree with that, but I think that the issue certainly has enough weight that it should be looked at and discussed freely within the forums.anonymus wrote:yeahyeah we have heard it now, apparently you still feel you need to defend yourself so maybe there is something to the critisism you are arcing here..Emmdizzle wrote:Sour grapes cuz you'll never see the top my man.
Also we have heard what a naughty boy you have been, so let's just drop both sides now shall we? Everyone on the site knows what's up either way,, no matter who the conq is at the moment there will still be players I and many with me respect more..
Teamplayers (many good generals on the site who lead their teams to victory in clanwars or games against equal teams) or really good 1v1 players that play whatever and stay around major since 1v1 is 1v1..
Long way of saying what ever but hey that's just me..
/
lmao, he posts, but still has not started any new games.Emmdizzle wrote:Sour grapes cuz you'll never see the top my man.
You're probably right. As long as there are cheats who are prepared to abuse the system then there will never be a level playing field.Emmdizzle wrote:Sour grapes cuz you'll never see the top my man.
Why do you care if he plays games? A lot of time goes into any freestyle casual game to be avaliable at all hours of the day to take your move. Why dont you care that Thai Robert and Mehenigan aren't playing games and would you be upset if they weren't if they made it to the #1 spot?jrh_cardinal wrote:lmao, he posts, but still has not started any new games.Emmdizzle wrote:Sour grapes cuz you'll never see the top my man.
Start making games, make them private if you want to invite one person to each team, or public and don't use invites, and if you keep your score you will gain respect with me, and I think just about everyone else on this thread. I've got no problem with you playing one game type, you have to in order to be conqueror. If you're really a good player, you don't have to abuse the invite system.
On the contrary - you should be jealous of me because I know how to play the game properlyEmmdizzle wrote:Not cheating..I play within the rules...Like I said before...sour grapes....jealous lil biatch.
you're right.ljex wrote:Why do you care if he plays games? A lot of time goes into any freestyle casual game to be avaliable at all hours of the day to take your move. Why dont you care that Thai Robert and Mehenigan aren't playing games and would you be upset if they weren't if they made it to the #1 spot?jrh_cardinal wrote:lmao, he posts, but still has not started any new games.Emmdizzle wrote:Sour grapes cuz you'll never see the top my man.
Start making games, make them private if you want to invite one person to each team, or public and don't use invites, and if you keep your score you will gain respect with me, and I think just about everyone else on this thread. I've got no problem with you playing one game type, you have to in order to be conqueror. If you're really a good player, you don't have to abuse the invite system.
ljex wrote:Why do you care if he plays games? A lot of time goes into any freestyle casual game to be avaliable at all hours of the day to take your move. Why dont you care that Thai Robert and Mehenigan aren't playing games and would you be upset if they weren't if they made it to the #1 spot?jrh_cardinal wrote:lmao, he posts, but still has not started any new games.Emmdizzle wrote:Sour grapes cuz you'll never see the top my man.
Start making games, make them private if you want to invite one person to each team, or public and don't use invites, and if you keep your score you will gain respect with me, and I think just about everyone else on this thread. I've got no problem with you playing one game type, you have to in order to be conqueror. If you're really a good player, you don't have to abuse the invite system.

i feel this is a good quote to look back on atmChariot of Fire wrote:If a man beats his children he will, nevertheless, still be a 'father'.
Mine and countless others it would seemIt's just YOUR opinion that's it's abuse
Yeah, and Sir Edmund Hillary could have been carried on a sedan chair by servants (that's 'cooks' to you) to the summit of Everest. Hardly the same thing though is it. And are you really so unabashed as to think you're the first to devise such a system? Maybe others have scruples, honour, a sense of fair play, etc etc.Just face it, I found a way to get to the top and YOU DIDN'T
I'm not crying about it. On the contrary, I'm laughing publicly in your face and watching you squirm trying to defend yourself.You and some of your friends can cry all day about it
It makes me feel better about playing the game in the manner it was intended, as well as showcasing what a hollow victory you have earned yourself. Who knows....maybe someone not in possession of all the facts looks at the scoreboard and mistakes you for a real conqueror.but what does that do in spite of everything?
REPUTATION WORTHLESS!!MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!