Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
his rating of you was justified. He started the chat, but your responses weren't exactly nice lol. Kind of like your first post which is one big flame (there's a form btw, you deleted it, the C&A mods may not look into the case unless the form is filled out correctly). To me this is FAMO on both sides, maybe you can prove ratings abuse if you show that some of the other poor ratings were not justifiedoVo wrote:Accused: Zorb15
The accused is suspected of being a little pussy who leaves retaliatory ratings,
for the majority of his opponents.
Comments: His verbal abuse in our game has now extended to my wall
where he just left me the endearing message, "f*ck you red neck loser."
Hmmm... so in your judgement I deserve his all 1s rating? I wouldn't have bothered making this post but I noticed that 54 of his 60 ratings are all 1s. I used the form provided and linked to his ratings left while simply deleting the parts that weren't applicable. He is accused of Ratings Abuse, not over using the worn out expression, "fuck you you dumb american red neck loser" in all his games.jrh_cardinal wrote:his rating of you was justified. He started the chat, but your responses weren't exactly nice lol. Kind of like your first post which is one big flame (there's a form btw, you deleted it, the C&A mods may not look into the case unless the form is filled out correctly). To me this is FAMO on both sides, maybe you can prove ratings abuse if you show that some of the other poor ratings were not justified
No, I said his rating of you was justified. As in it was perfectly plausible for him to rate you all 1's. It's got nothing to do with my personal opinion.oVo wrote:so in your judgement I deserve his all 1s rating?
That is a good example, particularly msuse of tags. It's pretty obvious what the "clueless" and "poor strategy" tags mean, and pink clearly wasn't guilty of either.oVo wrote:TheRookThief won this game and Zorb15 rewarded his good play with an all 1s rating
and the tags Clueless, Secret Diplomacy, Follower and Poor Strategy.
yes, but that's not good enough anymore. The mods don't have unlimited time, they can't do everything themselves. You now have to provide some evidence yourself.oVo wrote:linked to his ratings left
seeEvil Semp wrote:Lets raise the bar a little bit. You as the accuser should provide some evidence, not just he has five pages of the worst rating that he can give.
Please provide lets say 5 of the ratings and why they are abuse.
jefjef started you off so that leaves 4.
Or, perhaps, he only rates the people that he finds bad. I used to do that, I didn't give out good ratings, only bad ratings to players who I didn't enjoy playingoVo wrote:90% of Zorb15's ratings are all ones, meaning only 6 out of 60 are positive.
So he either plays against a lot of butt bags or his MO is retaliation.
9 out of his 10 ratings left are all 1s
Or, perhaps, giving 54 all 1 ratings is retaliation for schooling him in games. You don't think 54 all 1s out of 60 ratings left might be an excessive pattern? In our match TheRookThief played a flawless game for the win and Zorb15 left him all 1's with the tags Clueless and Poor Strategy... which is absurd fiction. His abusive attitude expressed in games not only matches his rating methods but likely explains his 24% win rate.TheForgivenOne wrote:Or, perhaps, he only rates the people that he finds bad.
Wasn't saying that was the case, but i was just adding onto what you said.oVo wrote:Or, perhaps, giving 54 all 1 ratings is retaliation for schooling him in games. You don't think 54 all 1s out of 60 ratings left might be an excessive pattern? In our match TheRookThief played a flawless game for the win and Zorb15 left him all 1's with the tags Clueless and Poor Strategy... which is absurd fiction. His abusive attitude expressed in games not only matches his rating methods but likely explains his 24% win rate.TheForgivenOne wrote:Or, perhaps, he only rates the people that he finds bad.
oVo wrote:90% of Zorb15's ratings are all ones, meaning only 6 out of 60 are positive.
So he either plays against a lot of butt bags or his MO is retaliation.
yes, perhaps. you have to prove it. Innocent until proven guilty, prove that he's guilty.oVo wrote:Or, perhaps, giving 54 all 1 ratings is retaliation for schooling him in games. You don't think 54 all 1s out of 60 ratings left might be an excessive pattern? In our match TheRookThief played a flawless game for the win and Zorb15 left him all 1's with the tags Clueless and Poor Strategy... which is absurd fiction. His abusive attitude expressed in games not only matches his rating methods but likely explains his 24% win rate.TheForgivenOne wrote:Or, perhaps, he only rates the people that he finds bad.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
