Seriously though no-one said anyone "deserved" to die. That's a big leap to make.You agreed with MV's comments that an American soldier deserved to die for merely being in Afghanistan.
Moderator: Community Team
Seriously though no-one said anyone "deserved" to die. That's a big leap to make.You agreed with MV's comments that an American soldier deserved to die for merely being in Afghanistan.
You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
We can all laugh at ourselves.. It's not a rare commodity.Woodruff wrote:You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
But hey if it makes you feel special, do it.ksslemp wrote:We can all laugh at ourselves.. It's not a rare commodity.Woodruff wrote:You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
I guess I would definitely have to disagree with you on that one. It definitely does seem to be. But you probably wouldn't want to be seen agreeing with Woodruff the Marxist anyway.ksslemp wrote:We can all laugh at ourselves.. It's not a rare commodity.Woodruff wrote:You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
Responding to a quote to yourself and double posting was invented in McGill.ksslemp wrote:But hey if it makes you feel special, do it.ksslemp wrote:We can all laugh at ourselves.. It's not a rare commodity.Woodruff wrote:You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote:I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.The Bison King wrote:I think MViola is pretty damn brave for saying what he said. Not "Cowardly" as VOP put it.There is a difference between not supporting a war and not supporting the troops engaged in the war. You've crossed into "not supporting the troops" territory. The vast majority of people don't appreciate this and the vast vast vast majority of people tend to think your comments are rather disgusting honestly.
Woodruff wrote:I guess I would definitely have to disagree with you on that one. It definitely does seem to be. But you probably wouldn't want to be seen agreeing with Woodruff the Marxist anyway.ksslemp wrote:We can all laugh at ourselves.. It's not a rare commodity.Woodruff wrote:You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
You suck at drawing conclusions regarding what things qualify as and what they don't qualify as.ViperOverLord wrote:Woody:
That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote:I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.The Bison King wrote:I think MViola is pretty damn brave for saying what he said. Not "Cowardly" as VOP put it.There is a difference between not supporting a war and not supporting the troops engaged in the war. You've crossed into "not supporting the troops" territory. The vast majority of people don't appreciate this and the vast vast vast majority of people tend to think your comments are rather disgusting honestly.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
He never agreed with what MViola said. He agreed that what MViola said was brave.ViperOverLord wrote:Woody:
That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote:I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.The Bison King wrote:I think MViola is pretty damn brave for saying what he said. Not "Cowardly" as VOP put it.There is a difference between not supporting a war and not supporting the troops engaged in the war. You've crossed into "not supporting the troops" territory. The vast majority of people don't appreciate this and the vast vast vast majority of people tend to think your comments are rather disgusting honestly.
I'd have agree.MeDeFe wrote:You suck at drawing conclusions regarding what things qualify as and what they don't qualify as.ViperOverLord wrote:Woody:
That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote:I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.The Bison King wrote:I think MViola is pretty damn brave for saying what he said. Not "Cowardly" as VOP put it.There is a difference between not supporting a war and not supporting the troops engaged in the war. You've crossed into "not supporting the troops" territory. The vast majority of people don't appreciate this and the vast vast vast majority of people tend to think your comments are rather disgusting honestly.
Are you seriously retarded? And I ask that question in entire seriousness, because it's really the only explanation I can see for you to say such a thing.ViperOverLord wrote:Woody:
That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote:I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.The Bison King wrote:I think MViola is pretty damn brave for saying what he said. Not "Cowardly" as VOP put it.There is a difference between not supporting a war and not supporting the troops engaged in the war. You've crossed into "not supporting the troops" territory. The vast majority of people don't appreciate this and the vast vast vast majority of people tend to think your comments are rather disgusting honestly.
How about a little more specificity.MeDeFe wrote:You suck at drawing conclusions regarding what things qualify as and what they don't qualify as.ViperOverLord wrote:Woody:
That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote:I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.The Bison King wrote:I think MViola is pretty damn brave for saying what he said. Not "Cowardly" as VOP put it.There is a difference between not supporting a war and not supporting the troops engaged in the war. You've crossed into "not supporting the troops" territory. The vast majority of people don't appreciate this and the vast vast vast majority of people tend to think your comments are rather disgusting honestly.
I'm not even remotely Marxist...that's simply yet ANOTHER claim that ViperOverLord made about me while refusing to support it with any actual statements of mine. It's his typical methodology here.ksslemp wrote:Didnt know you were a Marxists but not surprised.Woodruff wrote:I guess I would definitely have to disagree with you on that one. It definitely does seem to be. But you probably wouldn't want to be seen agreeing with Woodruff the Marxist anyway.ksslemp wrote:We can all laugh at ourselves.. It's not a rare commodity.Woodruff wrote:You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
You don't really have a strong understanding of the subject I teach, do you?ksslemp wrote:Thank God these kids have parents who can explain to them that their teacher is FOS
First time I've ever seen woody show emotion.Woodruff wrote:QUOTE ME, MOTHERFUCKER. WHERE DID I SAY THAT? AS I ASKED...BE FUCKING SPECIFIC, COWARD. In fact, I have absolutely disagreed with most of mviola's statements...not that I think you can actually read.ViperOverLord wrote:That's pretty simple. You agreed with MV's comments that an American soldier deserved to die for merely being in Afghanistan.Woodruff wrote:
Contempt? WHERE have I shown ANY contempt for the men and women currently protecting me, jackass? Where? Let's be specific. And maybe you won't run from this one like the fucking coward YOU are, as you have in the past. I definitely have contempt for you, though. You disgust me.
No, I've been quite contemptuous of sanctimonious assholes who believe in waving the flag and talking out of their asses.ViperOverLord wrote:Not only that you have been quite contemptuous against the people supporting the troops if you want to circle the landing pad that way.
Isn't the mere site of his avatar FUN? Spock is great and to prove it.The Bison King wrote:Honestly it seems like everyone here has completely lost the point. Especially Ksslemp who has digressed to making fun of Woodruff's Avatar. VOP made a statement he couldn't back then disappeared, and no so will I. Time to get drunk.
I believe his "specificity" was in reference to pretty much everything you stated there.ViperOverLord wrote:How about a little more specificity.MeDeFe wrote:You suck at drawing conclusions regarding what things qualify as and what they don't qualify as.ViperOverLord wrote:That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote: I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.
Look dude. If you cannot say that it is a cowardly thing to say that the men and women deserved to die for being in Afghanistan then that is contempt. Just because you are not the one that said it or you don't explicitly agree with it does not let you off the hook regarding contempt. And as I said, if you want to take the long way around the barn then just look at how you are flaming against those that support the troops and supporting those that made such insane claims against the troops.Woodruff wrote:Are you seriously retarded? And I ask that question in entire seriousness, because it's really the only explanation I can see for you to say such a thing.ViperOverLord wrote:Woody:
That is where you supported MV's claim(s) that men and women in uniform deserved to get killed for being in Afghanistan. I condemned his statements. You came to his defense. You said that it it was not cowardly to say such things. In my mind's eye that qualifies as contempt for the men and women in uniform.Woodruff wrote:I would agree with this. I did not find it cowardly either. It was several other things (<smile>), but not cowardly.The Bison King wrote:I think MViola is pretty damn brave for saying what he said. Not "Cowardly" as VOP put it.There is a difference between not supporting a war and not supporting the troops engaged in the war. You've crossed into "not supporting the troops" territory. The vast majority of people don't appreciate this and the vast vast vast majority of people tend to think your comments are rather disgusting honestly.
I did not IN ANY WAY support his claim that men and women in uniform deserve to get killed for being in Afghanistan, and you're really going to have to correlate exactly how you believe that's what my statement means...please start now. And be specific.
And I certainly cannot possibly see how you can see my statement as holding the men and women in uniform in contempt, so please explain that as well, again being specific.
In addition to that, I stated that mviola was not cowardly, which it certainly wasn't. How can speaking out about something in an unpopular manner POSSIBLY be cowardly? That's like the definition of not being cowardly.
Perhaps you should read ALL OF MY STATEMENTS in this thread prior to that one and see how you still feel about it, you fucking idiot.
I get a little (ok, not a little) pissed off when someone attempts to portray me as not supporting our military personnel. It's a subject that is extremely near and dear to my heart.Georgerx7di wrote:First time I've ever seen woody show emotion.Woodruff wrote:QUOTE ME, MOTHERFUCKER. WHERE DID I SAY THAT? AS I ASKED...BE FUCKING SPECIFIC, COWARD. In fact, I have absolutely disagreed with most of mviola's statements...not that I think you can actually read.ViperOverLord wrote:That's pretty simple. You agreed with MV's comments that an American soldier deserved to die for merely being in Afghanistan.Woodruff wrote:
Contempt? WHERE have I shown ANY contempt for the men and women currently protecting me, jackass? Where? Let's be specific. And maybe you won't run from this one like the fucking coward YOU are, as you have in the past. I definitely have contempt for you, though. You disgust me.
No, I've been quite contemptuous of sanctimonious assholes who believe in waving the flag and talking out of their asses.ViperOverLord wrote:Not only that you have been quite contemptuous against the people supporting the troops if you want to circle the landing pad that way.
You gotta read my posts in Spock's VOICE though...definitely adds to the experience. I promise!ksslemp wrote: Isn't the mere site of his avatar FUN?
I'm not even remotely Marxist...that's simply yet ANOTHER claim that ViperOverLord made about me while refusing to support it with any actual statements of mine. It's his typical methodology here.ksslemp wrote:Didnt know you were a Marxists but not surprised.Woodruff wrote:I guess I would definitely have to disagree with you on that one. It definitely does seem to be. But you probably wouldn't want to be seen agreeing with Woodruff the Marxist anyway.ksslemp wrote:We can all laugh at ourselves.. It's not a rare commodity.Woodruff wrote:You have to admit, at least I can laugh at myself with that comment of mine, right? <chuckle>ksslemp wrote:LIVE LONG AND PROSPER! HaHaHa
You don't really have a strong understanding of the subject I teach, do you?[/quote]ksslemp wrote:Thank God these kids have parents who can explain to them that their teacher is FOS
HE DIDN'T FUCKING SAY THAT, YOU RETARD...CAN YOU NOT FUCKING READ? QUOTE HIM - NOW.ViperOverLord wrote:Look dude. If you cannot say that it is a cowardly thing to say that the men and women deserved to die for being in Afghanistan then that is contempt.Woodruff wrote: Perhaps you should read ALL OF MY STATEMENTS in this thread prior to that one and see how you still feel about it, you fucking idiot.
You really need to learn how to STOP MAKING SHIT UP. I'd think you'd fucking have figured this out by now, but you're nothing but a fucking liar and you need to stop doing it.ViperOverLord wrote:Just because you are not the one that said it or you don't explicitly agree with it does not let you off the hook regarding contempt. And as I said, if you want to take the long way around the barn then just look at how you are flaming against those that support the troops and supporting those that made such insane claims against the troops.