[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Comments: the strategy of these guys i didnt undertood for several rounds, When green ( Anthony12 ) started the game tried to get ausy instead SA but however he took the option ( an smart one coz he will hit Degulator and avoid any suspect on the game ? maybe not) The funny thing is that red didn’t make any resistence in Ausy either.
Red had the opportunity to hit green break his bonus and take a wipe on him out but he didn’t also. Useless hits on each other.
They are both from the same country, and may in fact be friends, neither of which i have a problem with at all. My problem is that they have been in alliance, but have not stated it in game chat.
Last edited by Mesalina on Sat Sep 25, 2010 8:48 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Mesalina wrote:7695022 can someone take a look on here and tell me how you will name it?
secret alliance? secret diplomacy or...a dupe?
Green always had played on Red favor..
Look I like to lose a game because i can learn something from the experience but a thing is to lose in a fair game and another one quite different is to be ....cheated ?
Good dice to everyone
Mesa
If I were you, I would name it "I don't know how to fill out a form".
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Hahaha perhaps it can be because you cant translate my spanenglish..if i can have the opportunity to do it in Spanish in an Spanish Forum certanly you will not make that joke .....and i did it well now
Last edited by Mesalina on Sat Sep 25, 2010 7:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mesalina wrote:Hahaha perhaps it can be because you cant translate my spanenglish..if i can have the opportunity to do it in Spanish in an Spanish Forum certanly you will not make that joke
No, I understood the words you used. I was referring to the form that you had to delete in order to make the post you did. Basically, a new post defaults to a form-letter for you to fill in the blanks. You seem to have deleted that form-letter and just written a post. That form letter is there to help gather the information.
(Glad you realized I was just kidding you, though. Good to see you have a sense of humor about it.)
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Mesalina wrote:7695022 can someone take a look on here and tell me how you will name it?
secret alliance? secret diplomacy or...a dupe?
Green always had played on Red favor..
Look I like to lose a game because i can learn something from the experience but a thing is to lose in a fair game and another one quite different is to be ....cheated ?
Good dice to everyone
Mesa
Now, for a more serious answer...you can select multiple "problems" in the form. You can legitimately accuse someone of both being a multi and secret diplomacy, in a situation where it may be hard to tell.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Mesalina wrote:oka how do i erase the whole thing then
Hit edit. However, easier to go pretend to start a new form, copy the whole thing, exit without submitting, then edit this post to include the form, and change the information accordingly. Including, your topic line.
If you didn't understand that, then just copy the information in the quote below... then edit your original post
<DELETE ME>
PLACE THE NAME OF THE ACCUSED IN THE SUBJECT LINE!!!
Replace or delete any xxxxxxx with the appropriate information.
Delete any accusations or entries which do not apply.
Or copy another report. Mesalina I understand English might not be your first language but please use your own words. This quote from a closed C&A report. Does it look familiar? So what do you say we start over?
Accused:
??????
??????
The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Game number(s):
7176615
Comments: Trying to figure out the strategy these guys have had for the last several rounds, as I have left openings for them to hit each other to get an advantage in the game. However, they have put another player and myself out (almost), with no hits on each other. Looking back through the game, there have been a few hits on each other, maybe 5% of the time they attacked. However, it was always the result of needing to get to a position for attacking someone else. They are both from the same country, and may in fact be friends, neither of which i have a problem with. My problem is that they have been in alliance, but have not stated it in game chat.
Yes they are..i understood what he says and i was living the same situation please take a look on the game and you'll see. How can i use my own words if i can write just the basic things from my own and in a messy way ( perfect for those than want to get funny towards me or mak at me..so thanks to it guy you and another persons will finally understood well
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
Mesalina wrote:It Forum is useful for to make any discharge of secret allies and cheaters ?
No...this is the only place to do that. I just thought you were looking for a Spanish-speaking forum for general posting purposes.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
