College Football 2010

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
HapSmo19
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 5:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Willamette Valley

Re: College Football 2010

Post by HapSmo19 »

muy_thaiguy wrote:Oregon's "crazy pace" never showed up until the 2nd half. Do they have an explosive offense once they get going? Oh yeah. But they struggled in the first half.


I missed this the first time I read it.

By "crazy pace", I meant the no-huddle/hurry-up offense that they play the entire game. It wears defenses down :P
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12727
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:

Re: College Football 2010

Post by muy_thaiguy »

HapSmo19 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Oregon's "crazy pace" never showed up until the 2nd half. Do they have an explosive offense once they get going? Oh yeah. But they struggled in the first half.


I missed this the first time I read it.

By "crazy pace", I meant the no-huddle/hurry-up offense that they play the entire game. It wears defenses down :P

It's supposed to, but Washington wasn't looking worn down at the end of that first half. And yes I know about the spread no huddle, as Wyoming, Toledo, and Texas all run it.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
Knight of Orient
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:09 pm
Location: The Holy Land

Re: College Football 2010

Post by Knight of Orient »

HapSmo19 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Oregon's "crazy pace" never showed up until the 2nd half. Do they have an explosive offense once they get going? Oh yeah. But they struggled in the first half.


I missed this the first time I read it.

By "crazy pace", I meant the no-huddle/hurry-up offense that they play the entire game. It wears defenses down :P




didnt wear ohio state down in the rose bowl...just sayin.
you are entitled to your opinion...
that doesnt mean its right
User avatar
oVo
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: College Football 2010

Post by oVo »

#1 Oregon survived a road game at Cal when the Golden Bears' kicker
was penalized for motion to negate a 29 yard field goal that would
have given them the fourth quarter lead 15-13.

#2 Auburn looked confident while pulling out a 49-31 win over a much
improved Georgia team. Newton looks like the Heisman front runner as
the Tigers rushed for 315 yards and 5 touchdowns.

#3 TCU spotted San Diego State two touchdowns then answered with 34 points
before halftime and held on for a 40-35 win over the 7-2 Aztecs.

#5 LSU stepped on a cupcake 51-0

#6 Stanford struggled to get past Arizona State 17-13

#7 Wisconsin made Indiana look like a cupcake 83-20

#8 Nebraska dumps Kansas 20-3

#9 Ohio State puts up 35 unanswered points to cruise past Penn State 38-14

#10 Oklahoma State found little resistance in Austin... 33-16 over Texas

#12 Bama rolls over #19 Mississippi State 30-10

Northwestern upsets #13 Iowa 21-17

Notre Dame upsets # 14 Utah 28-3... is Utah overrated this year
or suffering a hangover from the TCU thumping last game?

#15 Arkansas rocks UTEP 58-21

#16 Oklahoma rocks Texas Tech 45-7

#17 Missouri outlasts #24 Kansas State 38-28

USC upsets #18 Arizona 24-21

#20 Virginia Tech beats UNC 26-10

#23 South Carolina earns their first trip to the SEC Championship game vs Auburn
by beating #22 Florida 36-14

Newest BCS Rankings:
1. Oregon 10-0
2. Auburn 11-0
3. TCU 11-0
4. Boise State 10-0
5. LSU 9-1
6. Stanford 9-1
7. Wisconsin 9-1
8. Ohio State 9-1
9. Nebraska 9-1
10. Oklahoma State 9-1
Last edited by oVo on Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:22 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
InsomniaRed
Posts: 2246
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 2:58 am
Gender: Female
Location: In Nick's heart

Re: College Football 2010

Post by InsomniaRed »

Slim chance \:D/


Though...Penn State is disappointing... :-$
      I will always love you Nick, Forever.
Image
      I will always love you Nick, Forever.
User avatar
ViperOverLord
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:19 pm
Location: California

Re: College Football 2010

Post by ViperOverLord »

I watched the games among the Top 4 and it was clear to me that Oregon and Auburn are not better than BSU and TCU. I can respect whoever thinks that, but its obvious that their conference statuses are getting them the nods.
High Score: #76 3053
User avatar
oVo
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: College Football 2010

Post by oVo »

ViperOverLord wrote:I watched the games among the Top 4 and it was clear to me that Oregon and Auburn are not better than BSU and TCU. I can respect whoever thinks that, but its obvious that their conference statuses are getting them the nods.

Actually it's the quality of the teams they've played that gives them the BCS Rankings edge.

Oregon (10-0) plays their 3rd ranked opponent in 2 weeks
Auburn (11-0) plays their 5th ranked opponent in 2 weeks
and the SEC Championship will be their 6th.
TCU (11-0) has played 2 ranked* opponents
Boise State (10-0) plays their 3rd ranked* opponent in 2 weeks
LSU (9-1) plays their 5th ranked opponent in 2 weeks they lost is to BCS #2 Auburn by a TD

*Oregon State is now 4-5 and unranked
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12727
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:

Re: College Football 2010

Post by muy_thaiguy »

1 thing to note, that for SDSU, up until their game with TCU, they probably should have been undefeated. But BYU officials "missed" a fumble (officials are suspended indeffinitly) that allowed BYU to score the winning TD, and in Mizzou's last play, there should have been a call in the back for an illegal block or holding (I forgeot which).

Utah is in full meltdown mode, as are my Cowboys.

And I think auburn will lose to Bama, and Oregon may not be able to get by Arizona's Defense. Just look at all the struggling Oregon had against Cal.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
strike wolf
Posts: 8345
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 12:03 am
Gender: Male
Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)

Re: College Football 2010

Post by strike wolf »

Is it bad that I don't want auburn in the NC? I know nothing has been proven ywt but its looking more and more likely that Cam Newton will be deemed ineligble.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12727
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:

Re: College Football 2010

Post by muy_thaiguy »

strike wolf wrote:Is it bad that I don't want auburn in the NC? I know nothing has been proven ywt but its looking more and more likely that Cam Newton will be deemed ineligble.

That, and Auburn has no defense to speak of. I think Bama may beat them, then Newton gets suspended, and TCU goes to the NC.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
ViperOverLord
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:19 pm
Location: California

Re: College Football 2010

Post by ViperOverLord »

oVo wrote:
ViperOverLord wrote:I watched the games among the Top 4 and it was clear to me that Oregon and Auburn are not better than BSU and TCU. I can respect whoever thinks that, but its obvious that their conference statuses are getting them the nods.

Actually it's the quality of the teams they've played that gives them the BCS Rankings edge.

Oregon (10-0) plays their 3rd ranked opponent in 2 weeks
Auburn (11-0) plays their 5th ranked opponent in 2 weeks
and the SEC Championship will be their 6th.
TCU (11-0) has played 2 ranked* opponents
Boise State (10-0) plays their 3rd ranked* opponent in 2 weeks
LSU (9-1) plays their 5th ranked opponent in 2 weeks they lost is to BCS #2 Auburn by a TD

*Oregon State is now 4-5 and unranked


Certainly Auburn and Oregon have had tougher schedules; but in theory they're still supposed to gauge who the better team really is in the polls. The computer system then throws in the merit for BCS rankings. But you don't see TCU or BSU above Oregon or Auburn? And to whoever, don't give me a million and one reasons why they're not ahead in the coach's poll or AP - It'd be like that every year. The truth is that the coaches/AP is biased and in addition to the AQ system they are more than willing to keep BSU/TCU in their place.
High Score: #76 3053
User avatar
HapSmo19
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 5:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Willamette Valley

Re: College Football 2010

Post by HapSmo19 »

InsomniaRed wrote:Slim chance \:D/


Oh. Let me update that for you ;)

In The Running/Slim Chance/No Chance:

HapSmo19 - Oregon & Oregon State for 22
muy_thaiguy - Boise State & Utah for 17
Woodruff - TCU & Oregon for 8
mviola - Wisconsin & Miami(FL) for 11
AceArtemis - USC & LSU for 35
Frito Bandito - Oregon State & Alabama for 25
jrh_cardinal - Alabama & Oregon for 6
john9blue - Wisconsin & Alabama for 13
Quirk - Georgia & Florida for 20
InsomniaRed - Nebraska & Penn State for 25
rockfist - Wisconsin & Alabama for 3
User avatar
HapSmo19
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 5:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Willamette Valley

Re: College Football 2010

Post by HapSmo19 »

muy_thaiguy wrote:...and Oregon may not be able to get by Arizona's Defense. Just look at all the struggling Oregon had against Cal.


That struggle was a fluke. Oregon 52, Arizona 10.
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12727
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:

Re: College Football 2010

Post by muy_thaiguy »

HapSmo19 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:...and Oregon may not be able to get by Arizona's Defense. Just look at all the struggling Oregon had against Cal.


That struggle was a fluke. Oregon 52, Arizona 10.

Fluke my ass. Prior to the game, Cal hadn't lost at home all season, and Oregon couldn't get anything going on offense.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
HapSmo19
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 5:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Willamette Valley

Re: College Football 2010

Post by HapSmo19 »

Hehe. Don't remember if I said it here but I've said all season that Cal would be trouble(more so than USC). They usually are for Oregon.

No doubt Arizona is watching film of that one and will bring a stingy defense but in the end - Oregon 59, Arizona 7 :D
User avatar
InsomniaRed
Posts: 2246
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 2:58 am
Gender: Female
Location: In Nick's heart

Re: College Football 2010

Post by InsomniaRed »

HapSmo19 wrote:
InsomniaRed wrote:Slim chance \:D/


Oh. Let me update that for you ;)

In The Running/Slim Chance/No Chance:

HapSmo19 - Oregon & Oregon State for 22
muy_thaiguy - Boise State & Utah for 17
Woodruff - TCU & Oregon for 8
mviola - Wisconsin & Miami(FL) for 11
AceArtemis - USC & LSU for 35
Frito Bandito - Oregon State & Alabama for 25
jrh_cardinal - Alabama & Oregon for 6
john9blue - Wisconsin & Alabama for 13
Quirk - Georgia & Florida for 20
InsomniaRed - Nebraska & Penn State for 25
rockfist - Wisconsin & Alabama for 3

You crush my dreamssssssssssssssssssss :cry:
      I will always love you Nick, Forever.
Image
      I will always love you Nick, Forever.
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12727
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:

Re: College Football 2010

Post by muy_thaiguy »

Well, didn't expect Utah to have such a meltdown. Otherwise I would have been pretty close.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
HapSmo19
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 5:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Willamette Valley

Re: College Football 2010

Post by HapSmo19 »

InsomniaRed wrote:You crush my dreamssssssssssssssssssss :cry:


Penn State crushed you're dreams, sorry.

You get a free premium anyway.... ;)

muy_thaiguy wrote:Well, didn't expect Utah to have such a meltdown. Otherwise I would have been pretty close.


Without looking at what Utah has left, there is still a chance, I think.
User avatar
InsomniaRed
Posts: 2246
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 2:58 am
Gender: Female
Location: In Nick's heart

Re: College Football 2010

Post by InsomniaRed »

HapSmo19 wrote:
InsomniaRed wrote:You crush my dreamssssssssssssssssssss :cry:


Penn State crushed you're dreams, sorry.

You get a free premium anyway.... ;)

muy_thaiguy wrote:Well, didn't expect Utah to have such a meltdown. Otherwise I would have been pretty close.


Without looking at what Utah has left, there is still a chance, I think.

But I could've given it away :P
      I will always love you Nick, Forever.
Image
      I will always love you Nick, Forever.
User avatar
HapSmo19
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 5:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Willamette Valley

Re: College Football 2010

Post by HapSmo19 »

InsomniaRed wrote:But I could've given it away :P


Totally! To me!

wait...
User avatar
InsomniaRed
Posts: 2246
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 2:58 am
Gender: Female
Location: In Nick's heart

Re: College Football 2010

Post by InsomniaRed »

HapSmo19 wrote:
InsomniaRed wrote:But I could've given it away :P


Totally! To me!

wait...

Exactly... :-s
      I will always love you Nick, Forever.
Image
      I will always love you Nick, Forever.
User avatar
HapSmo19
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 5:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Willamette Valley

Re: College Football 2010

Post by HapSmo19 »

Heheee. I'm missing enough turns lately with the four I'm playing. I plan on buying one myself once I'm snowed-in.
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12727
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:

Re: College Football 2010

Post by muy_thaiguy »

HapSmo19 wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:Well, didn't expect Utah to have such a meltdown. Otherwise I would have been pretty close.


Without looking at what Utah has left, there is still a chance, I think.

Only way that happens is if they blow out the rest of the teams on their schedule. Even then, it looks iffy at best to me.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
HapSmo19
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 5:30 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Willamette Valley

Re: College Football 2010

Post by HapSmo19 »

Hmmm. Lots of three-loss teams ahead of em though, which seems odd.

WTF? Why is Nevada so far down?

http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/rankin ... 5815940840
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12727
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 12:20 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:

Re: College Football 2010

Post by muy_thaiguy »

HapSmo19 wrote:Hmmm. Lots of three-loss teams ahead of em though, which seems odd.

WTF? Why is Nevada so far down?

http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/rankin ... 5815940840

Loss to unranked Hawaii and scraping a win against unranked Fresno. Plus, they're non-BCS, which is why TCU and BSU can't quite get into the top 2 unless Auburn or Oregon get knocked off.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”