Moderator: Community Team
there was also a study recently done combined with the new information they have gotten from mars and it states that both earth and mars is heating up normally, and earth is only slightly abnormal and it is not doin much to effect itneoni wrote:in before ignorant, lazy idiots say it is natural and that there's nothing we can do about it
Al Gore may not be a scientist, but this organisation is composed of scientists, and they seem to think global warming might be a problem.Serbia wrote:Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science.
100% agreed.Serbia wrote:Global warming is a natural process that humans are not affecting. Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science. As such, I'm not worried about it. Besides, here in Michigan, we could have used a little warming, February was the one of the coldest in history here.
Dukasaur wrote:Your obsession with mrswdk is really sad.saxitoxin wrote:taking medical advice from this creature; a morbidly obese man who is 100% convinced he willed himself into becoming a woman.
ConfederateSS wrote:Just because people are idiots... Doesn't make them wrong.
The reason I say it's not science is simple. It's not an absolute. The fact that there are many respected scientist on both sides proves that it is not an accepted science yet. Take gravity, for example. There is no debate on gravity, it has been proven to be a law. But you cannont create a scientific model proving global warming. And there are many scientists who don't believe in the mad hysteria surrounding the current arguement. I am not a scientist, and don't care to look up the agruements for or against. However, the data is there for anyone to look up. Believe what you will. But remember, global warming has NOT been scientificly proven. If you want to have faith that it exists as a problem, fine by me.Stopper wrote:Al Gore may not be a scientist, but this organisation is composed of scientists, and they seem to think global warming might be a problem.Serbia wrote:Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science.
There is more evidence than not that global warming is real - besides, by constructing solar panels, wind turbines, and nuclear power plants, we are boosting the economy. So even if it isn't real, we boosted the economy.Serbia wrote:The reason I say it's not science is simple. It's not an absolute. The fact that there are many respected scientist on both sides proves that it is not an accepted science yet. Take gravity, for example. There is no debate on gravity, it has been proven to be a law. But you cannont create a scientific model proving global warming. And there are many scientists who don't believe in the mad hysteria surrounding the current arguement. I am not a scientist, and don't care to look up the agruements for or against. However, the data is there for anyone to look up. Believe what you will. But remember, global warming has NOT been scientificly proven. If you want to have faith that it exists as a problem, fine by me.Stopper wrote:Al Gore may not be a scientist, but this organisation is composed of scientists, and they seem to think global warming might be a problem.Serbia wrote:Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science.
The one problem with the "evidence" is that it's debatable. It is not conclusive, therefore, not science.unriggable wrote:There is more evidence than not that global warming is real - besides, by constructing solar panels, wind turbines, and nuclear power plants, we are boosting the economy. So even if it isn't real, we boosted the economy.Serbia wrote:The reason I say it's not science is simple. It's not an absolute. The fact that there are many respected scientist on both sides proves that it is not an accepted science yet. Take gravity, for example. There is no debate on gravity, it has been proven to be a law. But you cannont create a scientific model proving global warming. And there are many scientists who don't believe in the mad hysteria surrounding the current arguement. I am not a scientist, and don't care to look up the agruements for or against. However, the data is there for anyone to look up. Believe what you will. But remember, global warming has NOT been scientificly proven. If you want to have faith that it exists as a problem, fine by me.Stopper wrote:Al Gore may not be a scientist, but this organisation is composed of scientists, and they seem to think global warming might be a problem.Serbia wrote:Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science.
I think Richard Branson offered a prize to the first person who can create a CO2 -> O2 + C machine.
And made the air cleaner, to boot. So even if it's not causing a global warm-up, people will be healthier in general. Now if only they would eat right and excercise....unriggable wrote:There is more evidence than not that global warming is real - besides, by constructing solar panels, wind turbines, and nuclear power plants, we are boosting the economy. So even if it isn't real, we boosted the economy.Serbia wrote:The reason I say it's not science is simple. It's not an absolute. The fact that there are many respected scientist on both sides proves that it is not an accepted science yet. Take gravity, for example. There is no debate on gravity, it has been proven to be a law. But you cannont create a scientific model proving global warming. And there are many scientists who don't believe in the mad hysteria surrounding the current arguement. I am not a scientist, and don't care to look up the agruements for or against. However, the data is there for anyone to look up. Believe what you will. But remember, global warming has NOT been scientificly proven. If you want to have faith that it exists as a problem, fine by me.Stopper wrote:Al Gore may not be a scientist, but this organisation is composed of scientists, and they seem to think global warming might be a problem.Serbia wrote:Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science.
I think Richard Branson offered a prize to the first person who can create a CO2 -> O2 + C machine.
Well even so it would be nice if we could take care of the enviroment and not destroy the ecosystems. Contrary to popular belief, we can't survive without certain animals and plants.Serbia wrote:The one problem with the "evidence" is that it's debatable. It is not conclusive, therefore, not science.unriggable wrote:There is more evidence than not that global warming is real - besides, by constructing solar panels, wind turbines, and nuclear power plants, we are boosting the economy. So even if it isn't real, we boosted the economy.Serbia wrote:The reason I say it's not science is simple. It's not an absolute. The fact that there are many respected scientist on both sides proves that it is not an accepted science yet. Take gravity, for example. There is no debate on gravity, it has been proven to be a law. But you cannont create a scientific model proving global warming. And there are many scientists who don't believe in the mad hysteria surrounding the current arguement. I am not a scientist, and don't care to look up the agruements for or against. However, the data is there for anyone to look up. Believe what you will. But remember, global warming has NOT been scientificly proven. If you want to have faith that it exists as a problem, fine by me.Stopper wrote:Al Gore may not be a scientist, but this organisation is composed of scientists, and they seem to think global warming might be a problem.Serbia wrote:Global warming, as a major problem, as portrayed by Al Gore and others, is NOT science.
I think Richard Branson offered a prize to the first person who can create a CO2 -> O2 + C machine.
But ok, I'll cool it with my "not science" arguement for a bit.