pimpdave wrote:Phatscotty wrote:
The Tea Party thrives on the first amendment. How can you get the issues so perverted?
So then how do you square that with the Tea Party-wide effort to eradicate all Muslims from the organization?
one at a time please.
How can it be Tea Party wide, if every person in my group is surprised by this information, has never heard of this information, and DOESN'T AGREE with this information. I tell my congressman, Keith Ellison(in case you didn't know he's the first Muslim congressman in US history), he needs to join the Tea Party all the time (Jesse Ventura too!). He is a regular on a local conservative talk show, and it truly is a model for civility in political debate. Despite being a Democrat, he works often
together with Michelle Bachmann. If I told you I voted for Ralph Nader in 2004, perhaps you would be able to set all your preconceptions aside and actually see my words instead of the feeding the impulse to fit me into an engineered symbol by your political masters who get a kick out of playing the masses.
You may also want to reference this with a previous post of mine. You must have seen it, it was in your thread...or maybe you lost track of all the threads. Either way, it's right here
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=137486&p=3004691&hilit=keith+ellison#p3004691So really, the number 1 Tea Bagger you know. yours truly, is already on record (in your thread) as being the opposite of what you accuse him of being. My question to you now is, why in the world would you throw information in my face, when it is already crystal clear the information you threw does not match up with the information you already have on the topic?
And my answer to your question is, I don't square it. You have it perverted.