Moderator: Community Team
I would have a thread dedicated to every Aladdin character individuallyArmy of GOD wrote:Only if we can have a thread dedicated to Jasmine...
Well obviously the people who came to kill the Beast were in the right, as they were simply enforcing the laws of the land. Consider the forest lawless and the castle a bastion for criminals. Sooner or later the Beast had to be punished for his crimes against Belle. Sometimes when victims are held against their will for long periods of time, they will begin to empathize or feel badly for their captors. Belle was clearly suffering from this mental illness. It's a horrible message to send to kids, and you'll find no such controversy in Madagascar the series.john9blue wrote:She obliged to selflessly save her father... and that's an extremely loose definition of slave. And she turned on them because she was open-minded and could see that the Beast was good. Seriously, how long has it been since you saw the movie? You can't call Belle anything other than a hero and good role model for young girls.
Wasn't Belle only there for like 3-4 days at the most with talking/singing/dancing household items? Not exactly alone, plus she was more or less free to roam the castle (minus the one room with the flower).Juan_Bottom wrote:Well obviously the people who came to kill the Beast were in the right, as they were simply enforcing the laws of the land. Consider the forest lawless and the castle a bastion for criminals. Sooner or later the Beast had to be punished for his crimes against Belle. Sometimes when victims are held against their will for long periods of time, they will begin to empathize or feel badly for their captors. Belle was clearly suffering from this mental illness. It's a horrible message to send to kids, and you'll find no such controversy in Madagascar the series.john9blue wrote:She obliged to selflessly save her father... and that's an extremely loose definition of slave. And she turned on them because she was open-minded and could see that the Beast was good. Seriously, how long has it been since you saw the movie? You can't call Belle anything other than a hero and good role model for young girls.
Stockholm Syndrome.Juan_Bottom wrote:Well obviously the people who came to kill the Beast were in the right, as they were simply enforcing the laws of the land. Consider the forest lawless and the castle a bastion for criminals. Sooner or later the Beast had to be punished for his crimes against Belle. Sometimes when victims are held against their will for long periods of time, they will begin to empathize or feel badly for their captors. Belle was clearly suffering from this mental illness. It's a horrible message to send to kids, and you'll find no such controversy in Madagascar the series.john9blue wrote:She obliged to selflessly save her father... and that's an extremely loose definition of slave. And she turned on them because she was open-minded and could see that the Beast was good. Seriously, how long has it been since you saw the movie? You can't call Belle anything other than a hero and good role model for young girls.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Take your hate speech elsewhere, please.ben79 wrote:i'll have to clear something out : walt disney hated jews = fact --------- jews are a race = false, it is a religion that's all, so anyone can freely hate jews or any other religious people without being a racist = fact

natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
It all makes sense if you really think about it!john9blue wrote:that's actually hilarious, i never thought about the interpretation of belle having symptoms of stockholm syndrome, although i highly doubt that's what the creators had in mind...


Dreamworks animation studios is a company that's about creating entertainment for the family, not about showing sex to children or encouraging them to be slutty or stupid.


please tell me where's the hate in that sentence, can you elaborate on it please, i don't see itnatty_dread wrote:Take your hate speech elsewhere, please.ben79 wrote:i'll have to clear something out : walt disney hated jews = fact --------- jews are a race = false, it is a religion that's all, so anyone can freely hate jews or any other religious people without being a racist = fact
Surely you understand that saying things like "it's not racism if you hate jews" can be considered hate speech.ben79 wrote:please tell me where's the hate in that sentence, can you elaborate on it please, i don't see itnatty_dread wrote:Take your hate speech elsewhere, please.ben79 wrote:i'll have to clear something out : walt disney hated jews = fact --------- jews are a race = false, it is a religion that's all, so anyone can freely hate jews or any other religious people without being a racist = fact

I think he is just trying to make an argument that anti-semitism is a different form of bigotry and not racist as such.natty_dread wrote:Surely you understand that saying things like "it's not racism if you hate jews" can be considered hate speech.ben79 wrote:please tell me where's the hate in that sentence, can you elaborate on it please, i don't see itnatty_dread wrote:Take your hate speech elsewhere, please.ben79 wrote:i'll have to clear something out : walt disney hated jews = fact --------- jews are a race = false, it is a religion that's all, so anyone can freely hate jews or any other religious people without being a racist = fact

Juan_Bottom wrote:Well obviously the people who came to kill the Beast were in the right, as they were simply enforcing the laws of the land. Consider the forest lawless and the castle a bastion for criminals. Sooner or later the Beast had to be punished for his crimes against Belle. Sometimes when victims are held against their will for long periods of time, they will begin to empathize or feel badly for their captors. Belle was clearly suffering from this mental illness. It's a horrible message to send to kids, and you'll find no such controversy in Madagascar the series.john9blue wrote:She obliged to selflessly save her father... and that's an extremely loose definition of slave. And she turned on them because she was open-minded and could see that the Beast was good. Seriously, how long has it been since you saw the movie? You can't call Belle anything other than a hero and good role model for young girls.

That it promotes a flawed idea of gender?stahrgazer wrote: As for Disney being sexist: sure. Very few he/she's in Disney. Most females had decidedly female attitudes, and most men had decidedly male attitudes. Some women had evil female attitudes, some had benevolent; some men had evil male attitudes, some benevolent.. but definitely there were gender traits.
What, precisely, is wrong with women being women and men being men? I don't get the idea that "human equality means we're exactly the same." I like diversity.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
I see, so you're saying it's ok to abduct people as long as you're compassionate about it. Great moral of the story, bro!stahrgazer wrote:I guess you missed the part where Beast showed a heart and compassion after all, which is what led to Belle deciding he wasn't such a terrible thing after all?Juan_Bottom wrote:Well obviously the people who came to kill the Beast were in the right, as they were simply enforcing the laws of the land. Consider the forest lawless and the castle a bastion for criminals. Sooner or later the Beast had to be punished for his crimes against Belle. Sometimes when victims are held against their will for long periods of time, they will begin to empathize or feel badly for their captors. Belle was clearly suffering from this mental illness. It's a horrible message to send to kids, and you'll find no such controversy in Madagascar the series.john9blue wrote:She obliged to selflessly save her father... and that's an extremely loose definition of slave. And she turned on them because she was open-minded and could see that the Beast was good. Seriously, how long has it been since you saw the movie? You can't call Belle anything other than a hero and good role model for young girls.
*snip*
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Did it feel racist?stahrgazer wrote:
As for Dreamworks, there was a movie with ants, and the evil ants happened to be a lot darker than the hero ants... is that a sign of modern racism?
Well I don't actually watch Dreamworks pictures myself. But that's clearly just traditional garb, so I really commend Dreamworks for making a children's film that's fun and friendly to South American traditions. They're like children's PBS in theaters. Unlike Disney with the film Aladdin, which is more destructive to Arab Culture than beneficial to it.The Bison King wrote:Chel from Dreamworks, Road to El Dorado is like the leading cause of Pre-Teen Boners in North America.
What?! are you serious? If you don't even watch Dreamworks movies you don't have a clue what you are talking about. Chel was a thief and mega slut. Like the worst example for women ever! Also there's like mass human sacrifice in that movie. Basically the 2 white guys pretty much tell south American Indians that they're doing it wrong, and make them stop.Well I don't actually watch Dreamworks pictures myself. But that's clearly just traditional garb, so I really commend Dreamworks for making a children's film that's fun and friendly to South American traditions. They're like children's PBS in theaters. Unlike Disney with the film Aladdin, which is more destructive to Arab Culture than beneficial to it.
THAT SOUNDS AWFUL! Who want's to watch that?They're like children's PBS in theaters.
Well, if you recall, the supposedly "abducted" people trespassed on Beast's land; it's not like he went to the city looking to abduct Belle. So wasn't it fair of Beast to hold them accountable for trespassing?MeDeFe wrote:I see, so you're saying it's ok to abduct people as long as you're compassionate about it. Great moral of the story, bro!stahrgazer wrote:I guess you missed the part where Beast showed a heart and compassion after all, which is what led to Belle deciding he wasn't such a terrible thing after all?Juan_Bottom wrote:Well obviously the people who came to kill the Beast were in the right, as they were simply enforcing the laws of the land. Consider the forest lawless and the castle a bastion for criminals. Sooner or later the Beast had to be punished for his crimes against Belle. Sometimes when victims are held against their will for long periods of time, they will begin to empathize or feel badly for their captors. Belle was clearly suffering from this mental illness. It's a horrible message to send to kids, and you'll find no such controversy in Madagascar the series.john9blue wrote:She obliged to selflessly save her father... and that's an extremely loose definition of slave. And she turned on them because she was open-minded and could see that the Beast was good. Seriously, how long has it been since you saw the movie? You can't call Belle anything other than a hero and good role model for young girls.
*snip*

I'd say it's about as racist as the movies you named from Disney. I mean, my gosh, they made the bad guy DARK.. just like, my gosh, Disney made the circus workers DARK.Juan_Bottom wrote:Did it feel racist?stahrgazer wrote: As for Dreamworks, there was a movie with ants, and the evil ants happened to be a lot darker than the hero ants... is that a sign of modern racism?

So if someone walked on my property, I can imprison them for trespassing, as long as I make them fall in love with me afterward? I'm confused at the logic behind this movie now.stahrgazer wrote:Well, if you recall, the supposedly "abducted" people trespassed on Beast's land; it's not like he went to the city looking to abduct Belle. So wasn't it fair of Beast to hold them accountable for trespassing?MeDeFe wrote:I see, so you're saying it's ok to abduct people as long as you're compassionate about it. Great moral of the story, bro!stahrgazer wrote:I guess you missed the part where Beast showed a heart and compassion after all, which is what led to Belle deciding he wasn't such a terrible thing after all?Juan_Bottom wrote:Well obviously the people who came to kill the Beast were in the right, as they were simply enforcing the laws of the land. Consider the forest lawless and the castle a bastion for criminals. Sooner or later the Beast had to be punished for his crimes against Belle. Sometimes when victims are held against their will for long periods of time, they will begin to empathize or feel badly for their captors. Belle was clearly suffering from this mental illness. It's a horrible message to send to kids, and you'll find no such controversy in Madagascar the series.john9blue wrote:She obliged to selflessly save her father... and that's an extremely loose definition of slave. And she turned on them because she was open-minded and could see that the Beast was good. Seriously, how long has it been since you saw the movie? You can't call Belle anything other than a hero and good role model for young girls.
*snip*