Haggis_McMutton wrote:What, joke stage is over already?
Well, ... okay then.
Commander9 wrote:Unvote. Vote Streaker.;;
My first semi-serious vote goes to Streaker for being the 4th person on the BW (just a casual vote because people voted above him) and encouraging others to join (even if it wasn't completely serious.).
Yeah, he did seem a bit too eager, and it's not like there's anything better right now, so vote streaker as well.
I was going to vote for him as well, but I do not think it is deserving of a wagon, not just yet.
Edoc'sil
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
I'm still here, sorry for being quiet. So far, I haven't seen any tells that I have felt significant enough to chase down myself. The bw on victor revealed very little and everyone else seems to be playing it safe...
Hmm...I'll stick true to my word and unvote victor for the time being and while I do find it a bit interesting that some people were a bit quick to jump to his defense, it's not completely out of character for at least two of them to fairly aggressively defend someone they don't believe is scum and the other wasn't all that aggressive in his defense.
On the other side of things I would agree for the most part that streaker's vote on victor stood out more than the other 3. Nag and edoc's votes seemed to be slightly more along the line of joke votes with a bit of serious reasoning behind them and my main goal was mostly to get victor to pay some attention to this thread which hopefully I've succeeded in time will tell. Streaker seemed to follow along the more serious reasoning and he did seem to hint along the lines that he wanted the wagon to build more and jumped on the wagon when it seemed to be gaining a bit of steam. So yes I find that more interesting than Edoc or Nag's vote. small FOS streaker
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
My point was more or less, that it seemed like Victor just posted his typical "oh sorry, i've been away, will catch up soon."
I was hoping to get two posts from him by this point. To me it looks like just a simple post, that will be the last one we get for a week, then he will come back and make another simple post that has nothing to do with any of the topics at hand.
Bruceswar: I have big news coming out soonish
Violet: oh, what big news?
Bruceswar: I am leaving KORT to go to RA
strike wolf wrote:Hmm...I'll stick true to my word and unvote victor for the time being and while I do find it a bit interesting that some people were a bit quick to jump to his defense, it's not completely out of character for at least two of them to fairly aggressively defend someone they don't believe is scum and the other wasn't all that aggressive in his defense.
On the other side of things I would agree for the most part that streaker's vote on victor stood out more than the other 3. Nag and edoc's votes seemed to be slightly more along the line of joke votes with a bit of serious reasoning behind them and my main goal was mostly to get victor to pay some attention to this thread which hopefully I've succeeded in time will tell. Streaker seemed to follow along the more serious reasoning and he did seem to hint along the lines that he wanted the wagon to build more and jumped on the wagon when it seemed to be gaining a bit of steam. So yes I find that more interesting than Edoc or Nag's vote. small FOS streaker
I'm assuming you've referenced me as one of the people who defended Sully. It's not to say that I believe that he's town (same goes with everyone else), but it's also illogical to assume and bw someone on day 1 just because they've not shown up, especially when there are replacements ready to go.
I'm not really a fan of the "Hell, why not?" attitude on the Victor wagon. Yes, the logic behind how wagons move is correct, but to be so nonchalant about it strikes me as a bit odd.
Maybe a bit I guess you could say. I was fairly confident that it wouldn't come to a lynch and that if it somehow did it was probably hi own fault so I guess I might have been a little bit lax in my approach but I still find it to have been a valid move at the time, if for no other reason to draw attention to an inactive so the mod could deal with it. And while I don't think Victor or anyone who defended him (aggressively, passively, or one stand alone remark) came out looking that much more suspicious I do think that it did present a few interesting arguments so I have no problem with it. Especially as I think Streaker is a legitimate day 1 lead to at least explain his part on the wagon.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.